With so many factual interesting things to discuss why the hell is Art wasting his time talking to bozos about aliens "occupying" Earth and impregnating women?
- posted
20 years ago
With so many factual interesting things to discuss why the hell is Art wasting his time talking to bozos about aliens "occupying" Earth and impregnating women?
I listened for about 10 min. in my car at 3:15 am in the morning. He mentioned devices such as sexual stimulation gagets for use on the abductees and priming "adolesents" for future use and "9,10,11,12 year olds" in the same paragragh. The signal kept fading in and out so I could not determine if this was some wacky pedo fantasy. He also went on about the importance of re-abducting the "mothers of the hybrids" for the purpose of breastfeeding.
Utter Bullshit that Aliens would need or want Humans for breeding purposes. Not only is the fantasic farce of genome differences obvious to even the non scientist, but the fact that a species with a superior technology and the ability circumvent time and space would need Human DNA to mate 'cause of their genetic weakness is silly. Kinda like us with spaceflght but without Watson and Crick and not understanding the double helix concept.
This whole 'abduction' phenomena for lack of a better word strikes me as yet another pseudo-religion grasping in desperation to learn the ultimate truth of the Universe and/or a savior of sorts. The fact of the matter is that the Universe does not present a sentient ambassader nor a deity to do pallor tricks for her children. That is the secret. We're on our own and no one is coming to save us from ourselves, at least in biological form assuming an afterlife.
In the Rabbit Mobile. How's it running? Think you'll get another one someday?
I believe Kansan would beg to differ.
Well, that may be true but I've got some great news Bunn. ...... I just saved a fortune on car insurance by switching to Crapco! (To steal a line from your favorite commercial.)
Think you'll get another one someday?
But this!
My God. How delightful it would be to dance on twisty mountain roads of New Jersey with this magnificent beast.
Of course, I'd order this cute accessory Bunny as a companion.
And I have to hear it daily ad nauseam on the radio out of NYC with the ad ending "not available in NJ or Mass". IIRC, upon reading a consumers website a while ago, it stated that their rates were not any cheaper than the rest of the thieves. Almost as annoying as those 'Onstar' ads featuring dolts who somehow manage to lock their keys inside the car alone or along with children. Some even while the auto is still running.
How does one accomplish such a feat if the remote locking is on the _key_ ring???
(snip)
All these V6 and V8 engines are OK, but I'm still waiting for someone to put out a nice sports car with an INLINE V6. Now that would be ultra cool. Screw the "V" format, give me something that will rev SMOOTHLY beyond 6K. VRRRRRrrrrrrrOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMM!!! Heck, even Chevy put out an SUV recently with an Inline 6. I was drooling. Didn't like the platform, though. And of course, no real tranny available :( -Dave
Jaguar XKE.
Ford Falcon (Austrailia)
Other various Jaguars, BMWs, etc.
Toyota Supra TT? Or is that a V6 as well?
Do you know about Bimmers Dave? They have everything you want! Great cars too. Given that you seem to be a fairly "aggressive" driver (kudos to you), the M3 might be right up your street. Fast, responsive, awesome handling, inline six, real tranny (6sp). But then, at 74 grand with cloth seats (!), it had better be darn good.
No such animal could ever exist.
Dodge Dart
At that point ya might as well add ford maverick, chevy nova, etc etc...
Wouldnt the "boxer", with opposing, coplanar cylinders be a better design? Subaru has a 6 cyl boxer engine, it is called H I believe, on their Outback (?) model.
Oh, I guess I should have added, and not a Ford. :) -Dave
Yeah, if I thought they weren't terribly overpriced, I'd consider one. I have nothing against bimmers at all, just don't see the value in them (compared to the competition), even if they do have the inline 6, real tranny, etc. I mean, it would be child's play to put out a nice 2005 or later smallish sedan (not coupe, not hatchback, not mini-SUV, not two-door with false back seat) with powerful inline 6, manual tranny, possibly even REAR wheel drive with limited slip differential AND keep the price down to say ~$35 K or less. Easy! Why it hasn't been done is a real mystery, as that puppy would probably outsell the top ten (camry?, taurus, etc.) combined, in the U.S. at least. -Dave
Yup, typo. My bad. :) How about inline V6's (plural). That's already been done, hasn't it? :) -Dave
BMWs don't count?
-- Mike Smith
"Dave C." wrote
Lexus IS300 is inline-6 and less $$$ than BMWs. Also the GS300 and SC300 use the same I6. At lease the IS300 is available with a manual transmission; all are RWD.
Floyd
Brilliant cars, very high $$$$$$.
Damn, I'll have to look into that. :) -Dave
Don't forget the special "grenading engine" feature.
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:45:54 -0400 (EDT), snipped-for-privacy@webtv.net (Keith) wrote in alt.fan.art-bell:
The car's top, or hers?
-- V.G.
"People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker (This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM)
Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.