check/replace lower control arms on 2000 323

The usual symptoms of worn track control arm bushes is wheel wobble at approx 60 mph - and possibly on braking. Never heard brake squeal put down to this. The usual cure for brake squeal is to lubricate - sparingly - the

*back* of the pad with copper grease. That's assuming the anti-rattle springs are in place and undamaged - a cack handed fitter can easily bend them on removal, or not bother re-fitting them.

I'm with Dave on this one, brake squeal is completely unrelated to the symptoms that would occur if the lower control arms were worn. If youir friend was having handling problems -- shaking, shimmy, rattle, roll -- then I would suspect control arms. I would not expect control arms to be worn out on a car with only 80,000 miles either.

Thanks. I thought 80k was a little early for these to wear out. I did see a lot of talk of replacing them in my web searches though.

This is a little tricky because my friend isn't that familiar with this stuff, so I don't know if the shop was trying to blame the squeel on the control arms (big red flag), or claiming they found it when they revisited the brakes. I remember years ago when I had a german car the 2 shops I tried that specialized in german cars were some of the worst I've ever used.

On my own car I've made squeel go away with anti-squeel grease. Even using high performance pads that some people don't consider the quietest.

I wonder if we might have worked together: In the 90s I did a little work with a guy with your name in Silicon Valley.

If you are talking about front control arm, the mechanics might be correct. The control arms on E46 (esp. early models) tend to wear quite quickly and is gone by around 45K. Both arms on mine 99' 323 were replaced, and it is just 51K on the clock.

B

The life of these - and on different models - seems to vary dramatically. Some have had, as you, what most would consider an early failure. Others find they last over 100,000 miles. I wonder if the wheel size and or road surface condition as well as driving style influences this?

I suspect that it also depends upon environmental conditions, too. I note that many US posters who advocate changing them in the 60K-100K range are on the East coast where a lot of salt is used on the roads in winter. Those boots can only keep so much out.

FloydR

The boots Honda uses must be a lot different, then!

1991 Honda Accord, 185K or so, original ball joints.

2002 E46 325i, 80K or so, second set of lower control arms due to ball joint wear at about 50K. That's my wife's car. She is less careful about bumps (not that our roads are terrible) and drives less agressively than I do.

All driven year-round in New York State. Lots of salt is used here in the winter.

On the other hand, on my 2004 E46 330i with almost 50K on it they show no signs of wear. Go figure...

JRE

I needed mine replacing at about 65,000 miles.

Are you *sure* you're comparing apples to apples, here?

Ball joints to ball joints? Well...yes, actually, though I'm not an automotive engineer, I do think that's a reasonable apples-to-apples comparison.

It's the outboard ones that wear on the E46. Both the BMW and Honda designs have MacPherson Strut front suspensions that I would expect to load that joint in a similar way under braking and cornering loads. However, the Honda also loads the joint under acceleration and while maintaining speed because it is FWD. I would not expect this additional loading to *increase* the life of the joint. The Honda has a somewhat more-conventional design with a lower control arm and tension rod in place of BMW's triangular lower control arm with its trailing bush, but I would not expect this to have a huge effect on the life of the outboard ball joint.

My strong suspicion is that ball joint, lubrication, and seal technologies ought to be pretty darn well-established by now, and not differ materially between Germany and Japan. Why a car of similar weight (perhaps with more weight on the front wheels) and with (probably) more unsprung weight should have more durable ball joints--by far--is something of a mystery to me as a result.

Perhaps the metallurgy, machining, seals, or the lubrication were not done right. Or perhaps in an effort to curb unsprung weight they used smaller ball joints, which with their higher specific loading, might be expected to be less durable. I don't know why they wear so quickly, and frankly I don't care--though someone at BMW AG ought to figure that out.

Having said all that, I'm not sure I'll ever go back to Hondas but I

*do* wish the E46's suspension design were more durable. It's a pain in the neck to change the lower control arms.

JRE

No, but I would expect the Honda to be designed with much harder bushings, because of the need.

I'll second that. Quite a spendy wear item, to need replacing as often as it does.

BMW use a fluid filled type to provide some compliance - ie it's not just a plain old ball joint.