Anyone recall the posting from a few months ago regarding using tires that are several years old but never (or hardly) used? The consensus seemed to be that even if tires are in pristine condition, if they are more than a few years old they should be replaced. I need some back-up to settle an argument in my family about this topic. My wife swears that her dad's VW microbus does not need tires because the ones on it are in such good shape...although they must have been installed around 1998 and the vehicle has been parked with the tires on for at least
6 years (it's driven minimally each summer). I say it's risky to drive it at 70mph with those tires. Any comments appreciated.Terry