chryslers crossfire

chrsylers new crossfire sure looks awesome! Does any one know how well it compares to other sport cars.....ie stangs,vettes,vipers? What price are they selling for? TIA Ruben

Reply to
RBG Z06
Loading thread data ...

It's substantially slower than all the cars you mention above (unless you're talking about the V6 Mustang). It's more expensive than a Mustang (by a fairly wide margin) and cheaper than the others you mention (also by a fairly wide margin). For the same (or less) money, if you just want to go fast and have rear wheel drive sporty car, try:

Mustang RX-8

350Z

Cheers,

C
Reply to
Chris Mauritz

I suppose the Crossfire, being a modified Merc SLK, will be faster then the Mustang on narrow bending roads. But on a straight road.. the Mustang will blow away the crossfire. Martin

Reply to
Martin Boer

It lists at $35,000 and EVERYTHING is standard equipment except for the automatic transmission. It comes with Manual tranny.

Reply to
Richard Benner Jr

The Crossfire comes with a 215 hp V6 engine. For $35+K, I would have hoped for more power than a turbo PT Cruiser. It is definitely a "sporty" car but doubt it matches the speed or handling of the cars in it's target group. A friend who test drove one said it was so-so on speed and handling was good. But...he is 6 ft tall and said it was damn near impossible to get in and out and that his head hit the roof with the seat lowered and reclined some. A nice boulevard cruiser for short people is the way he put it.

Reply to
CopperTop

But isn't power delivery more uniform and smoother from the normally-aspirated?

DAS

--

Reply to
Dori Schmetterling

Would you settle for more than an Audi TT? A BMW Z4? A Toyota MR2? A Mercedes SLK230? A Mazda RX-8 automatic? Within 10 of a Porsche Boxster?

Reply to
Lloyd Parker

Coupe has several engine options, which include 180 hp/auto/FWD, 225 hp/manual/AWD, and 250 hp/?/AWD. Zero-to-60 for these cars range from

6.3 to 7.9 seconds. Roadster has same engine options as Coupe. Zero-to-60 ranges from 6.6 to 8.1 for the roadster. 250HP comes from 3.2 L engine (same displacement as Crossfire but apparently spec'd at 35 hp more). Cost = between $38 and $40k USD.

Z4 3.0i 0-60 = 5.9 seconds (228 hp) Z4 2.5i 0-60 = 7.0 seconds (190 hp)

Z4 cost = between $40 and $45k.

HP = 138 MR2 weighs 1000 lbs less than Crossfire and retails for 1/2 the price.

192 hp, 0-60 = 7.0 seconds. This car (4-cyl engine) _does_ actually appear to be a worse performer than the Crossfire. Same weight (about 3100 lbs) but powered by a 4-banger. $40 USD.

Yes, there is quite a difference between the auto and standard isin't there? Let's look at both, shall we?

Auto/manual hp: 197/238 Auto actually has more torque (164 vs 159) and peak comes at lower rpm (5000 vs 5500). Curb weight very comparable to Crossfire (3050 lbs).

0-60 time for auto is hard to find. 0-60 time for standard is 5.9 seconds. Most people that buy an RX-8 will probably NOT get the automatic anyways ...

Boxter hp: 225

0-60: 6.4 seconds cost: $43k USD

Boxter S hp: 258

0-60: 5.7 seconds cost: $52 USD

Crossfire has 3.2L engine, 215 hp, 3060 lbs, 0-60 is 6.4 seconds (Road & Track). Cost is about $34k USD.

Conclusion:

Crossfire is less expensive than comparable models (MR2 not really in the same league). Crossfire does not stand out in performance but it does have curb appeal and is a head-turner. It does have interior issues with ergonomics and seating.

Big tires mean tire-slap when driving over expansion joints. Getting into the car means climb over the relatively high sill, keep head down to clear low roof, keep knee tucked in before bashing the bolster - all at the same time. Tall people complain that it's uncomfortable getting in and out, and that once in there isn't much space (if you're claustrophobic you won't like this car). Big structural reinforcement behind the seats limits seat travel even though there's plenty of room behind it. Seat bottoms are too short and the steering wheel adjusts for reach, not rake. Interior painted plastic is of questionable taste. Blind spots are huge - the triangular rear window is almost useless and the mirrors are way too small for serious driving. This car is all about the styling, and probably the RX-8 comes closest in terms of head-turning looks, price and performance.

Reply to
MoPar Man

It is extremely small in person. I was surprised the first time I saw one. I would expect the handling to be excellent, as it's got to be at least as rigid as the Mercedes.

Reply to
Joe

Yes, but since the Crossfire is 2wd, let's stick to comparing apples with apples.

So what are you assuming is the Crossfire's 0-60 time?

I believe you'll find Mazda has lowered both.

So it beats the standard Z4 and the TT, and ties the Boxster. Its primary competition.

Reply to
Lloyd Parker

Gee, you'll take a 50k car or an 80k car over a 32k car. Wouldn't most?

Reply to
Lloyd Parker

Reply to
mic canic

Of those choices, the Mustang is really the only affordable choice. Though, as I mentioned previously, the new Mazda RX8 and Nissan 350Z are also an option (much faster AND cheaper) if you're looking for something small and sporty. The Mazda even has a back seat.

Cheers,

C

mic canic wrote:

Reply to
Chris Mauritz

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.