different gas, different gas mileage

I've always liked chevron gas because it has techroline, which is one of the best fuel detergents. But I've noticed lately that when I buy Chevron my 2009 PT seems to get about 2 - 3 mpg worse gas mileage. My other typical fill up is some "FastGas" type place. This change has happened often enough that I'm pretty sure it's not completely my imagination. Anyone else noticed such a change from one brand to another? On the FastGas I usually get 24.5 on my typical driving cycle, 70% commute, on the Chevron it drops down to about 22.

Reply to
Ashton Crusher
Loading thread data ...

Brands have different additives, but nothing that should affect gas mileage given equal octane. Most likely it's just plecebo effect.

Reply to
AZ Nomad

Amount of alcohol added, seasonal blend formulations and accuracy of the blend, quality of gas as far as moisture/water due to condensation that collects in the tanks, particularly during th winter can be a factor.

Reply to
Bill Putney
10% ethanol out here and that's not a seasonal thing.

local techs recommend a small amount of amsoil 2 stroke in your gas tank but a very small amount, about 1 ounce per 10 gallons i think but i am checking on that now.

Reply to
Rob

Are these by any chance techs who make a large profit on replacing catalytic converters?

--scott

Reply to
Scott Dorsey

"Ah, you used a bit too much..."

Reply to
News

lol really

Well.... maybe it's no different than putting Marvels Mystery Oil in the fuel???

Reply to
m6onz5a

Hard to get accurate mpg without controlled highway driving. Catching more red lights, more idling, and a few pedals to the metal could account for that difference. You need multiple tanks of the same stuff, then multiple tanks of the other, and careful attention to driving style. If there's a cold snap during one brand test but not the other, toss everything out, and start again. You might find a difference. But do you really want to do that?

--Vic

Reply to
Vic Smith

While I agree that different brands likely will have SOME difference in energy content and milage, that seems like a lot.

You need to do a good milage test and compile statistics.

You need to do about ten samples to get a real valid test, so this is ten tankfuls each. Then figure the milage individually for each of the ten tankfuls and use one of those "statistics" calculators. You need to determine the Probable Error of each set of tests.

A number of years ago I bought a Dodge Neon that would run on either regular or premium but they recommended premium and said I would get better milage on premium.

I ran ten tankfuls of each. The tests said I got about 0.3 mpg better on regular. But... the probable error on the testing calc'd out at 0.5 mpg. It is very hard to measure mpg differences of about one mpg.

But, two to three ought to show up well.

Reply to
Don Stauffer

As I've posted before, my 2001 PT gets terrible milage. Here in Western PA and Eastern Ohio there's a huge supermarket chain, Giant Eagle. They have GetGo gas stations. For every $50 you spend at the market, you get 10=A2 off a gallon of gas. The only time I use GetGo gas is when I have a free tank coming. My cruiser on BB, Sunoco or Shell averages 16-17 mpg. My trips never change. I'm usually going to the same places the same number of times between fill ups. On the GetGo gas, I'm lucky if I come close to 13-14 mpg.

Reply to
Pete E. Kruzer

What have you done about it? Any codes in the ECM? Checked for vacuum leaks? Changed plugs, cap and rotor? Checked fuel pressure? Or just ignored it?

--scott

Reply to
Scott Dorsey

I get better than that with my 41 Windsor! 245.5 flathead 6. I had two PTs: a sedan and a convertible. Both got terrible mileage, the convertible with the 180hp turbo, got around 17-22 max. The sedan, with the base engine would get around 19-26. This is Florida with flat roads everywhere.

Reply to
sctvguy1

The best I've ever done on my wife's 2005 PT (automatic) was 27.5 on the highway. More typical is 24-25, and around town is 20 to 21. I don't consider that particularly good since her 3.5L Vision TSi that out-weighed the PT by a few hundred pounds and out-powered it by almost

100 horsepower got even better mileage (30 highway when it was in its prime). But what I really can't understand why your 2001 does so badly. I know other owners of early PTs which were similar to yours, though.
Reply to
Steve

Maybe it's different where you are, but here in VA, the decals on the pumps say something to the effect "May [ < key word] contain up to [ < more key words] 10% ethanol", so to me it is a real unknown, and who knows *what* determines from one batch to the next what the exact content is?

Reply to
Bill Putney

snipped-for-privacy@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote in news:hmlmki$7or$ snipped-for-privacy@panix2.panix.com:

Notice "Rob" hasn't got back to us about the results of his "checking"?

Reply to
Tegger

Ashton Crusher wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

I always record each and every fillup, writing down the odometer reading, how much went into the tank, and even the date and price.

Over 19 years, with an average of almost 18,000 miles per year, I have yet to notice /any/ discernible difference in mileage from one brand to another.

Because accurate results require very long-term measuring over many fillups, I run into seasonal temperature variation, which is a confounding factor.

However, there /is/ considerable difference in mileage from summer to winter and back again. This difference appears to be unrelated to gasoline brand.

There is also considerable difference in mileage when taking a single fillup against the others. I've seen as much as 15% variance in mileage between individual fillups. The variance is erased when many fillups are included in the calculation. This is true even when batches of fillups overlap.

I used to think I had seen an approximately 2% drop in mileage between 87- octane and 91-octane, but now I'm not so sure. My test periods extend over two or more seasons, so that 2% could easily be explained by temperature variation.

These are just my very careful observations. Take them as you will.

Reply to
Tegger

Tegger wrote in news:Xns9D30C3D2F6780tegger@208.90.168.18:

Clarification: the word "however" should not be in this paragraph. I ngelected to excise it while rearranging my previous post.

Reply to
Tegger

that's because some of us have a job.......i cant sit on the web and surf all day

Reply to
Rob

yeah same thing down here.......up to 10%.

Reply to
Rob

"Rob" wrote in news:4b8f292b$0$4891$ snipped-for-privacy@unlimited.newshosting.com:

But you said you were "checking on that now". So you're admitting you were fibbing?

Reply to
Tegger

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.