How Dare Could America Industrial Property Office Be In Conspiracy With Jungang International Patent Office To Make An Extravagant International Crime ?

How Dare Could America Industrial Property Office Be In Conspiracy With Jungang International Patent Office To Make An Extravagant International Crime ?

Currently a Korean party now holds the American patent 4919933, the Taiwanese patent 37414, the Japanese patent 2733523 and a Korean patent 044435 through The Korean Jungang International Patent Law Office(Address : 5th Floor, Jae Insurance Bld, #80, Susong-Dong, Jongro-Gu, Seoul, the Republic of Korea)

The Korean patent was for the method of producing the medicine, and the American, Taiwanese and Japanese patents were for the composition of the medicine. During the processing of the American patent the American Patent Office changed the Category of the Patent into the processing method rather than the patent for the composition of the medicine without consulting the Korean party concerned.

The Korean Jungang International Patent Law Office, stated that the medicine also works for skin problems during the processing and issuing of the Patent. At that time, an American working in the office , took the details of the Patent and tried to register it and gain protection under the American Patent Law and he also tried to claim the medicine as his own discovery. That is to say, Jungang International Patent Office found out the fact that a manufacturing process of products concerned with the oral cavity also had an enough effect on the skin to acquire the patent right and Jungang International Patent Office as an agent, should hand back the half of benefit to the first inventor, the old woman. Therefore, Jungang International Patent Office is hoarding up the valuable intellectual property rights as a result of notarizing the intellectual property rights under the America Patent Act by taking advantage of an American who worked for them at that time, in order to squeeze the half benefit out of the old woman.

To sum up, Jungang International Patent Office took advantage of making an American, who was an employee, notarize the usage for skin, as well as plan to delete the patent right for a composite before acquiring U.S.A Patent No. 4919933, recognizing that America Patent Act prescribes a special system which keeps the intellectual property rights, provided that someone attests a special value to the America Industrial Property Office in advance.

That is to say, Jungang International Patent Law Office, whose address is 80 Susong-dong Jongro-gu Seoul R.O.K, induced an American, who was an employee at that time, to maintain patent by notarizing a skin usage in U.S.A, and eliminate the patent for a composition in order to give the first inventor only the patent for a manufacturing technique which is not approved of receiving the half right of the patent for a composition, and also prevent the first inventor from receiving the half right of the patent for a composition. And, Jungang International Patent Office took advantage of another 5 persons' signed and sealed false papers instead of four family members' besides the original inventor's in the course of eliminating the patent for a composition.

The Korean party also feels that the American citizen also intervened in the application at the Japan Patent Office and the Taiwan Patent Office and that there was a conspiracy between the Central International Patent Law Office and the American citizen. The Director of "The Korean Central International Patent Law Office". Mr Lee, Byung-Ho's niece is married to an American citizen. The Korean party would greatly appreciate it if this matter could be investigated.

CHOI YEONG JA and 4 family members 446-12 Su-dong Sangdang-gu Cheongju-city Chungbuk, Korea Tel) 82-43-258-0908

The above statement has been delivered to the U.S.A Government Org. etc., so far.

Group home page :

formatting link
address : yeongja snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com

Reply to
Yeongja_Choi
Loading thread data ...

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.