Lucas Rear lens number

Can anyone on this NG advise what car the rear lamp lens with number LUCAS SAE STD 61 stamped on it belongs to?

I have the feeling it is a Ford Zephyr MK111, could someone confirm this?

Dixie

Reply to
dixie
Loading thread data ...

dixie ( snipped-for-privacy@wales.freeserve.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

JPG?

Reply to
Adrian

of Automotive Engineers standard (19)61

Early Lucas part numbers are about 8 figures like 54570392 ( its a winker lens costs 4/- fits?)

Later Lucas numbers are like RLL 642 (RLL rear light lens) and so on.

steve the grease

Reply to
R L Driver

Was that a special edition?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Dave Plowman (News) ( snipped-for-privacy@davenoise.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

Black'n'Gold, with ciggy adverts badly spelled all over it.

The OP's sent me a photo off-list, and it looks like a tail light to me. Nothing like a Mk 3 Zody one, though.

Reply to
Adrian

It seems unlikely, as far as I am aware all original parts fitted to Ford vehicles of that period are marked either Enfo or FoMoCo.

Reply to
Richard H Huelin

Lucas is the maker, which was a subsidery of BMC, so its likley that it is a Austin or Morris light. SAE STD 61 is as far as I remember like a British kite mark and of standard specification (61) say?

Jono

Reply to
Jono Barspeed

Whatever gave you that idea?

Lucas was never part of BMC or Leyland. Perhaps you're confusing it with SU carbs?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

"Jono Barspeed" realised it was Mon, 18 Oct

2004 16:28:53 +0100 and decided it was time to write:

Naturally, much about Lucas is still shrouded in darkness, but it's crystal clear that the company was never part of BMC.

Reply to
Yippee

ok, subsid was the wrong word, i meant more in partnership, they were based in the midlands, but lucas never made a lamp for Ford, and when Ford needed a lamp or reflector they at times dipped into the lucas parts bin. I used subsid because many companies made conscoius decisions years ago to be based alongside each other, same would go for Dunlop also based in the midlands.

J
Reply to
Jono Barspeed

Jono Barspeed (jono snipped-for-privacy@tesco.net) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

Eh?

Companies should set factories up *MILES* from their main customers and skilled assembly line workers, should they? If they're making millions of lights for a company in Birmingham, Inverness would be a logical location for a new plant?

Reply to
Adrian

They were never in partnership with BMC either. They were simply a supplier to them - as were many other firms.

Err, Lucas *did* make parts for Ford.

It makes sense for a supplier to be close to his main customers - certainly in those days.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Thanks for the comments.

Still no closer identifying the lens. I have noticed another number L704 on the main lens. Is this the identifier code?

Dixie

Reply to
dixie

That does sound like a Lucas id code, yes.

Reply to
Chris Bolus

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.