I think you are being some what overly kind to it's longliverty, or not....
I think you are being some what overly kind to it's longliverty, or not....
One inlet and one exhaust pushrod with forked rockers to 4 valves were good enough for Honda on the CX500 to over 9,000 odd rpm. Just for fun they put the heads on twisted at 22 dgrees to the the axis of the engine so instead of being cross flow they are more fore/aft flow.
:::Jerry:::: ( snipped-for-privacy@privacy.net) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
About 300 miles.
From what I remember not one major part interchangeable.
There's at least one of these privately owned, rebuilt a year or two ago and now running.
FFS Jerry - go and read _anything_ on Ford-based motorsport in the '70s or '80s. The differences are well-known and the Ford anoraks can bang on about them for decades.
Not that I ever cared - I hate Fords.
Perhaps if you worked on them rather than just read about them...
There is no doubt that the Cologne engine was better engineered but they both had their problems.
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember Adrian saying something like:
Heh. I suppose Jerry addressed that to me; to no avail, as the useless wanker is in my bozo bin and will remain there.
they were
useless
You are the clueless 'wanker'. That is why you don't want to see my replies as they show up your total ignorance.
Sorry, you've lost me on that one!
Geoff MacK
Hell's bloody bells!!!
The Riley one actually happened. Called Autovia, only 35 were built. Don't know much more than that about it.
Geoff MacK
In news:42b2110c$0$72345$ snipped-for-privacy@authen.white.readfreenews.net, :::Jerry:::: decided to enlighten our sheltered souls with a rant as follows
I *much* prefer the Essex V6 lump, personally, the Cologne doesn't have the torque or the sound quality of the Essex, and seems to kill camshafts much more quickly. The Essex is also easier to work on,.
:::Jerry:::: ( snipped-for-privacy@privacy.net) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
Odd, Jerry, that so many people think you're the clueless wanker, whilst you think so many others are clueless wankers.
Are you wrong, or are many others wrong?
they were
Yes, there are many clueless idiots on this (and other groups), too ready to believe what someone says on a web s**te or in a magazine which has a vestige interest in pushing an editorial line or two...
"Andy Dingley" wrote
The former. One camshaft per bank.
I beg to differ, though perhaps only on the definition of 'marginal'. Putting the water pump at the highest point anywhere in the engine bay means it stops pumping if you lose even a small amount of water, which overheats the engine. I'd call that marginal, meaning it only works at all if it's perfect nick.
Yet rumours persist that Triumph thought about it....
Indeed - my point is simply that there would or should have been a process in which they looked at the issues around putting the Rover unit into the Stag. The engineering feasibility would have been only one part of it. On its own it could have ruled it out but would not have been enough to rule it in.
"John Redman" wrote in message news:d8uk8o$j0e$ snipped-for-privacy@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
I read somewhere that when the companies combined there was a meeting to decide future models, what bits should go into what and who should make them. Unfortunately inter company rivalry and jealousy made a bit of a nonsense of this and when the suggestion of putting the Rover V8 into the Stag came up, and it did, the Triumph people said firmly "It won't fit", which was not exactly true, but nobody from Rover bothered to check.
Ron Robinson
This is the engine that was responsible for the development of the electronic engine analyser. Rather easier than going round all 30 cylinders shorting the plugs out with a screwdriver - especially an army one with the metal shaft coming all the way up to the top of the handle.
On all cylinders I trust...
Ron Robinson
Try:
Tsk, tsk. Grammar!
You mean *vestigial* interest. "Vestigial" seems to be appropriate in more ways than one. HTH.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.