new battery. As a side note my 98 did that and the new battery was a cure
for a few months and then the BCM/ECM, (don't remember which), went out and
left me sitting on a hot Interstate. Never saw the problem again in the next
4 years. May or may not be related, just something to think about. I once
let mine sit without a battery tender for 18 days and no problem. So far
I've not had to use anything to recharge or keep the battery charged.
Yes, sponge gate, to put it in reverse as you're told, is kind of a pain but
May be as simple as a linkage adjustment but I would be carring a volt
meter with me to check the voltage draw on the battery every time I
parked the car...
The electronics on these cars scare the hell out of me...
Lots of Luck...
68 SS 396 Chevelle
64 72 76 79 & 95 Corvettes
you were to think you could get out of the car without doing what you were
told. I love all those flashing words, blinking lights, and dinging bells,
my Toronado used to talk to me. They give that up because it was a woman's
voice and who listens to a woman telling you about a car problem? "Slow down
and pull safely to the side of the road", she said as she removed her
sweater. Now a man can understand that and would follow instructions. If it
were because the coolant temperature has reached 260 degrees he might think,
what the hell does she know and go on.
When I took delivery of my 2005 vet the head mechanic told me about the dead
battery problems and he said he is telling people to also engage the parking
brake as well as putting it in reverse. Mine is an automatic so I can't
speak from experience. One of their demos which is a stick had a dead
battery when the salesman tried to demo it for me. He couldn't even open the
door. My 87 was a stick but my old left leg demanded the auto this time. I
also had a 56 3speed stick. Bought it new when I got out of the air force in
Interesting, GM put out some bad information, their start up procedure was a
joke. The first instructions said, "To start the C6 6-speed the clutch has
to be depressed, the foot brake applied, the emergency brake set, and the
shift lever in reverse." Actually in order to start the C6 6-speed you only
need the clutch depressed. Can you just imagine killing the engine in
traffic and setting the emergency brake before you could re-start the
engine. So far I've had no problem with just reverse to shut down RAP that
kills the battery
Hey, my '57 was a 3 Sp. bought in Oct. '56, soooo long ago...........
Goto: http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zeromain and do a search on dead
battery and you'll find numerous posts about the problem. Part of it is
not following the shutdown procedure exactly (into reverse first, before
shutting down), some of it is circuits in the car that stay active for
up to twenty minutes after shutdown, a lot of it is the fob and leaving
it in or near the car and some of it is just a bad battery. Seems to be
less of a problem on automatics than the manuals. GM is trying to cram
too much technology into the car as a showcase when all we really want
is a reliable automobile with the performance of the C6.
C6 Mag Red
I usually only take it out on weekends so it sits for a week without
running. Most of the time everything is OK, its just that twice now
the battery has been completely drained. Hard to believe its the
battery, the post about the shutdown procedure is interesting. I'll
have to play around and see if it makes a difference.
Thanks for all of your comments and suggestions! This is my first
vette, a human being should not be allowed to have this much fun!
Not putting a car into reverse before shutting off killing the battery has
to be the most stupidest, idiotic design ever engineered into a car.
Next time I see a couple guys I know who are GM engineers, I'll tell them
It sure makes me appreciate the old ones.
Gayfox, why in blazes would you have to ask such a stupid question..???..is
this still another Gayfox blunder...??? It's interesting that you never
offer solutions to problems. Just the same dumb responses over and over
I am afraid I have to agree with Grayfox on this one. We have had cars for
years prefer the manual transmission be put in reverse. Good reasons
usually, theft prevention, better torque advantage to hold car still (use
the parking brake?), and so on. But to design a car that if you fail to do
what the maker prefers will kill the battery is ridiculous. Granted I've
heard the car beeps, flashes messages, and so on, but in the end, the car is
One thing I learned a long time ago, the guy who owns something is the guy
who determines how it is used, regardless of how smart or gifted he may be
in comparison with others around him.
Leaving a car in 4th or 1st or whatever shouldn't kill the battery, plain
and simple. There have been times I have driven into the garage and shut
the car off in neutral because I wanted to get out and move the car by hand
for some reason. Maybe I want to put it in first or whatever for a reason.
to know it is in reverse before I shut it off. The spongy reverse gate just
doesn't define what gear the shifter is in well enough for me to spend a
battery to find out. The old lift lock out on the shifter in my 72 is still
preferred and may be some of the reasons I don't like the non gated spongy
reverse in the 05. If you think about that you could still lift the lock and
stick it in 3rd. I still like the sound of the old 4 barrel carburetor
kicking in, yeahaaaa.......
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.