Re: 87 octane vs 89 octane

If you live considerably above sea level, another thing to consider is altitude. Keep in mind that octane serves essentially to reduce the chance of detonation. Generally speaking, reduced air density provides lower combustion temperature and pressure, so that higher altitudes require less octane.

If you live in Denver, for example, I've no doubt that you could run 87 octane and your Charger's PCM would never retard the timing at all. But I don't know where you cross the magic altitude line, though, that allows you to run 87 octane with zero detrimental effect. 1500 feet? 3000 feet?

With older engines, as air density decreases, the stoichiometry tends to move to rich, with a lower octane number requirement. This may not be applicable today, with carefully monitored air-fuel ratios.

Also with older engines, manifold vacuum controlled spark advance, and reduced manifold vacuum results in less spark advance, though I don't know if this would have any parallel effect on modern engines.

Marcus

I'm considering the purchase of a 2006 Charger with the 3.5L V6. I'm > concerned about the recommended octane level for the 3.5. All gasoline > is expensive and 89 octane is out of the question. I've read that 87 > octane is "OK" to use in the 06 3.5 but there must be a difference or > 89 wouldn't be the primary choice. What problems will I have if I use > 87 exclusively? (pinging, loss of power, etc.) Thanks. > > Man who scratches backside shouldn't bite fingernails. > The gene pool needs more chlorine. > Change .com to .net to reply direct. >
formatting link
Reply to
Marcus
Loading thread data ...

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.