94 dodge caravan question

Any idea how long the timing belts last in these under normal circumstances?

Reply to
Mike Hollywood
Loading thread data ...

I assume you have the 3.0 Mitsubishi in it. My parents have just under 300,000 km on theirs. My wife's 96 with the same motor has about 285k. I'm not planning on changing either of them any time soon.

Kevin

Reply to
KV

Bad mistake, Kevin. Have you ever seen the after effects of a broken belt on a 3.0? It's ugly. I suggest that you change both of them in the very near future.

Reply to
Bruce Grant

The 3.0 is NOT an interference engine.

No bent valves.

Reply to
aarcuda69062

the last 'interference' engine used by Mopar was the infamous 2.6 4 cylinder

Reply to
TranSurgeon

So what is Bruce talking about being a mess. I could see the belt breaking and talking out the plastice covers but that's about it.

R> the last 'interference' engine used by Mopar was the infamous 2.6 4 cylinder >

Reply to
Ron

Bruce is in error.

Reply to
aarcuda69062

Ay-yup. Still have one customer with a 2.6 in an 87 Caravan. Stupid thing won't die like it should...

Reply to
aarcuda69062

ok,if thats so,how do you explain 2 bent intake valves,and 2 exhaust valves on a pl,neon,that dropped a water pump,and the t-belt followed?i also know the 3.0 mitts.wont do that.mo.jeep service tech.

Reply to
LOWERLINK

Did you notice if it had any cut outs in the pistons ? I just had a 1989

3.0L apart and it had them thus making it a non interference eng
Reply to
Ron

I disagree. I recently had the heads off of a '94 Caravan that had snapped a belt and it had bent valves

Reply to
Bruce Grant

Bent valves.

Reply to
Bruce Grant

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.