guns on campus

wrote

Well, actually, there was a lively discussion on "gromits" going on at the rest stop. One feller was actually giving a demonstration on how to split a length of rubber hose and glue it on the edge of a bored hole. It was intense, but, sadly, all in attendance were unable to grasp the demonstration even though it was visually and verbally simple.

Steve

"Chris Thompson" wrote

its been quite a few years since i even layed eyes on

Careful, or you'll be accused of not even owning said gun because you haven't seen it in a while. People who own only one guy, and who play with it every evening just before bedtime don't understand the concept of safe storage, handprints on bluing, and treating valuable items with respect.

The gun industry did go through quite a lot of experimental .22 caliber shells before they arrived at the standard rounds used today. I believe they were making them proprietary so that they would also make money on the ammunition sales, too.

An interesting article on the history of the .22 cal. bullet:

It would seem that "theguy" was correct. It appears some serious bonding took place at the rest area. They have taken it to the point of ownership, pretty kinky imo.

You really don't comprehend well, do you? He repeatedly stated it is NOT a .357 magnum, instead it is a .357 Sig. But, of course, you had already attacked him. You picked a fight because you made an assumption. Rather than apologize, you stick to the "large caliber" argument so you can look like the innocent victim. You are an insecure, idiotic (I'm retracting my apology), sophomoric, horse's ass.

Yeah we saw, you already announced yourself in another off topic post to all your butt buddies. You seem to know alot about rest areas.

Think what you will, as I know for fact that is what you are going to do. The thing is though, as Ed H. said, you made an assumption about something which you did not have all the facts on and instead of asking a question you attacked. Then when you got caught doing the EXACT same thing you attacked me for, you tucked tail and started coming up with all sorts of other things to attack on. Instead of doing right and admitting that you were wrong, you made yourself shine as the hypocritical ass you really are.

Beryl is no better at any of this either, I am actually sorry to have classed you two as Snoman trolls. To Snoman, I apologize for lumping these two in the same "class" as you, you are a step above them in my book.

Thank you, O King of the Realm for making that distinction for us.

Steve

No, but I do stick to the argument that anyone who would blast away at any intruder with a .357 (anything) would be a remarkable idiot with regards to safety.

AZidiot was the one who originally made the comment that he'd blast away at things that go bump in the night (including occupants of his own household) with his big bad .357 handgun.

I hope he DOES live in Arizona. That puts a lot of distance between us. The rest of you better duck.

Steve

You don't read to well either. He said "Breaking into my house..." You made another assumption and jumped to the conclusion that it was a bump in the night. I hope you live on the east coast because I want as much distance from you while I'm in California as possible. I can imagine you behind me in traffic, approaching an intersection, but I want to go into the gas station on the far corner of the intersection, so I turn on my turn indicator at the near corner, you assume I mean the next intersection, look down at your little friend "blinky" because you think you might have to piss and don't notice my break lights, then you rear-end me. In the ensuing converstation I realize it's you, punch you in the face and spend the night in jail.

buddies and proud of it. We know alot about rest areas.

nice of you to admit it

own "gun", every chance that i get.

very strange steve.

What's strange are the changes in the text that are not part of what I wrote. Did you do that?

Steve

It took him several posts to get it out that it was indeed a SIG, and not just a plain vanilla .357. Not even a Magnum. Your memory is very selective.

Steve

I don't know what news reader you use, whether if follows indivual threads by topic instead of date, but his first response that it was a .357 Sig, and not a .357 magnum directly followed your vile attack on him. I think you are VERY sophomoric.

With all due respect to aswiley1, I know you are capable of speaking for yourself, but this clown has angered me with his inane assumptions. I wonder if the B. in Steve B. is short for "Bozo."

Your statement here really goes to show your lack of ballistics knowledge. A .357SIG does not have the same "power" behind it as you think it does. However, if you were to read about it, you might know that. You are stuck in your little world where just because it says .357 regardless of what is after it that it is the same.

So, now we resort to changing someone's name do we? Also, I would love it if you would point out where I made the statements you claim I did. You won't be able to because I didn't make them, I didn't imply them. You are also the one that made the statement that I would be the one to shoot my kid, not the other way around. Nor did I ever say, state or imply that I "blast away at things that go bumb in the night" that was once again you that did.

I do live in AZ, but would be more then happy to make a road trip, why don't you provide me your address. :)

Absolutely no worries Ed, have at it. I am enjoying the show as well as my hockey game!

So you can change sno's screen name but we can't change yours? LOL silly lil boy The word ' then ' means next. Get your son to explain to you the difference between then and than.

Oh, that neanderthalic, my stick is bigger than your's, "I went to a fight and a hockey game broke out," kind of sport. No wonder you are misunderstood! Big Grin. ;

"we"? barrell and dweeb had to call in reinforcements huh? i can understand, don't worry. they were getting their ass's kicked.