OT Pick the candidate

Page 3 of 4  
wrote:


Real simple so that anyone can follow this
Don't like, don't read it!
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Just FYI, this group is 98% crap and 2% Dodge trucks, just like every other Internet Usegroup. Hope this helps.
Steve
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote

My filter must be messing up again. I don't find the 2% Dodge truck stuff in every other Internet Usegroup. I'll go back and look again though but I've been to the end of Al's Internet 3 times already.
Before I go though, I think Mike n Tom vs Lindakay n Hildabeast. (Mike n Tom by 42 points...)
FMB (North Mexico)
PS: I took the "OT" off the subject line just in case someone else wanted to help split up the groups...
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Heeeeeeeeeeere's yer sign.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

which crap do you mean? you are gonna have to be a whole lot more specific around here.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
says...

Liberal vs Socialist... yippie...
Not that I watched it but Fred Thompson wasn't in that debate, nothing but a horse and pony show anyhow. I say he is the one most likely to win the primary as he is the only straight talker in the race from what I see. Also Condi as his VP would make a nice combo.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

I doubt that he has much of a chance as he is hard right and the general population is tired of taking it in the ass from the hard right. As for Condi, he would be a fool to do that as that lying piece of shit would turn more voters away than anything else.
--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving



Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@nc.rr.com the socialist bitch boy in a jealous rage says...

Har har har.

You're a riot. You're more dense and dumb than Snoball so forgive me if I dont waste anymore keystrokes on you.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
the socialist bitch boy in a jealous rage says...

That only leave a house plant
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
the socialist bitch boy in a jealous rage says...

That would make sense if not for the fact that just about every keystroke from you is a waste.
--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving



Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
the socialist bitch boy in a jealous rage says...

I disagree Tom, he put the list together re: the Idiot.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
TBone wrote:

Name something specific that Condi lied about that you can prove.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
How about 9/11 and the toxic gasses at the site. Go look it up.
--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
"miles" < snipped-for-privacy@nopers.com> wrote in message
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
TBone wrote:

Oh geez. Here we go again. Why do you liberals always want to make horrible things all pretty? Of course the 9/11 site was a dangerous place. You think Condi should have warned emergency workers that the site was dangerous prior to them going there? You think they should have waited until the air was clear prior to them arriving?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Do you not know that there is a difference between had and has?

Nope and if you would look past your bias, you would know that it would never happen either.

Then you would be foolish. First of all, while it is possible that he could have hidden this stuff so well that after years we still cannot find it, then they had to be pretty much inaccessible to him as well and if you cannot use them, then what difference does it make if they still exist? Furthermore, why hide something that you can easily make again later. He had the knowledge of how to make then and knew what was needed to do so. Why hide what can be later found and used against him when he could simply make new when they are needed. Now you and other like you come up with this fantasy that they were moved out of Iraq. Where exactly do you think that they went? Do you really think that a man like Saddam would hand over something that could and possibly would be used against him to someone else. Are you really this stupid????

Get real. He gave us a bunch of crap as to why we needed to go to war and here are some of the more popular ones.
1. Saddam was in league with the terrorists. This has been provent to be complete crap. 2. Saddam still had massive amounts of chemical weapons and the facilities to produce even more. Once again, we have found nothing even after years of looking in either weapons in storage or the facilities to produce more. 3. Saddam was going to use these weapons against the US. LOL, since he didn't have them or has them so well hidden that nobody can find them, how is he going to use them against anyone?
The simple fact of the matter is that the man liked living in luxury and was not about to forfeit all of that to make a pointless strike against the US or any other powerful nation.

Sorry to burst your bubble Ed but the truly biased on here is you. I don't like the man because he has done nothing in the past seven years that is positive for the common middle class person. He is an idiot and a fool and has made this country a laughing stock and a target. As for my line, even the idiot himself now admits that there are NO WMD;s in Iraq and that he did not have them.
--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving



Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

i think you are wrong on this one tom. hiding things like that are not that hard. in iraq and afganistan there are incredible numbers of conventional arms caches that we can not find now and they are readily accessible to the enemy because the enemy is using them on an almost daily basis. that doesn't even speak to the stuff that is hidden in neighboring countries. the prevailing whisdom at one time was never that they couldn't hide it where we would not be able to find it, just that he could never keep informants from telling us where they were if we showed his people that we could defeat him and if we offerred them money. that is no longer the prevailing wisdom because we have proven it to be false.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
TBone wrote:

You blabbing about someones bias? Oh now thats funny! Please explain why you feel Saddams WMD's could not have been moved out of Iraq.
Months ago I gave you evidence of tons of chemicals found in Syria that were traced to Iraq. You scoffed saying they were just chemicals (deadly ones!!) and not WMD's.

That is complete absurdity you've tried to spew before. If that were true then there is no point in anyone ever hiding anything from anyone. We know they existed (UN inventoried them and sealed them, they later went missing) and if your theory above were true then someone must know exactly what happened to them and where they or their remains are. Nice try Tom but your theory falls flat. Wheres the remnants or anyone who knows exactly what happened to them?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Throw in a third party/independent candidate and everything can change, as in the case of Bill Clinton who never won majority of the popular vote. I'm waiting for someone with the moral fortitude to say what's right and what's wrong, not what the polls tell him he should say just to get elected.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Ed H. wrote:

Majority vote doesn't matter, for better or for worse. If it did, Dubya wouldn't be prez either. During Clinton's era, the third party (Perot) did not affect the outcome of the election. If he had not been present and the Republicans had gotten those votes, Clinton would have received the same number of electoral votes. The race wasn't that close in any state, IIRC.
Perot received the vast majority of his votes from Texas. Texas still went to the Republicans by a HUGE margin.

Dubya claims that this is how he operates. I disagree. He is a pawn of big business and special interests. On top of that, he's a moron. I do think that polls should be considered in some cases. Afterall, that is the voice of the American people. The country belongs to us, not rich pricks from well-to-do families that spent their way to Washington.
Craig C.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Too true. Although the country may belong to us, the elections belong to the parties.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.