My filter must be messing up again. I don't find the 2% Dodge truck stuff
in every other Internet Usegroup. I'll go back and look again though but
I've been to the end of Al's Internet 3 times already.
Before I go though, I think Mike n Tom vs Lindakay n Hildabeast. (Mike n Tom
by 42 points...)
PS: I took the "OT" off the subject line just in case someone else wanted to
help split up the groups...
Liberal vs Socialist... yippie...
Not that I watched it but Fred Thompson wasn't in that debate, nothing
but a horse and pony show anyhow. I say he is the one most likely to win
the primary as he is the only straight talker in the race from what I
see. Also Condi as his VP would make a nice combo.
I doubt that he has much of a chance as he is hard right and the general
population is tired of taking it in the ass from the hard right. As for
Condi, he would be a fool to do that as that lying piece of shit would turn
more voters away than anything else.
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
Oh geez. Here we go again. Why do you liberals always want to make
horrible things all pretty? Of course the 9/11 site was a dangerous
place. You think Condi should have warned emergency workers that the
site was dangerous prior to them going there? You think they should
have waited until the air was clear prior to them arriving?
Do you not know that there is a difference between had and has?
Nope and if you would look past your bias, you would know that it would
never happen either.
Then you would be foolish. First of all, while it is possible that he could
have hidden this stuff so well that after years we still cannot find it,
then they had to be pretty much inaccessible to him as well and if you
cannot use them, then what difference does it make if they still exist?
Furthermore, why hide something that you can easily make again later. He
had the knowledge of how to make then and knew what was needed to do so.
Why hide what can be later found and used against him when he could simply
make new when they are needed. Now you and other like you come up with this
fantasy that they were moved out of Iraq. Where exactly do you think that
they went? Do you really think that a man like Saddam would hand over
something that could and possibly would be used against him to someone else.
Are you really this stupid????
Get real. He gave us a bunch of crap as to why we needed to go to war and
here are some of the more popular ones.
1. Saddam was in league with the terrorists.
This has been provent to be complete crap.
2. Saddam still had massive amounts of chemical weapons and the facilities
to produce even more.
Once again, we have found nothing even after years of looking in either
weapons in storage or the facilities to produce more.
3. Saddam was going to use these weapons against the US.
LOL, since he didn't have them or has them so well hidden that nobody can
find them, how is he going to use them against anyone?
The simple fact of the matter is that the man liked living in luxury and was
not about to forfeit all of that to make a pointless strike against the US
or any other powerful nation.
Sorry to burst your bubble Ed but the truly biased on here is you. I don't
like the man because he has done nothing in the past seven years that is
positive for the common middle class person. He is an idiot and a fool and
has made this country a laughing stock and a target. As for my line, even
the idiot himself now admits that there are NO WMD;s in Iraq and that he did
not have them.
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
i think you are wrong on this one tom. hiding things like that are
not that hard. in iraq and afganistan there are incredible numbers of
conventional arms caches that we can not find now and they are readily
accessible to the enemy because the enemy is using them on an almost
daily basis. that doesn't even speak to the stuff that is hidden in
neighboring countries. the prevailing whisdom at one time was never
that they couldn't hide it where we would not be able to find it, just
that he could never keep informants from telling us where they were if
we showed his people that we could defeat him and if we offerred them
money. that is no longer the prevailing wisdom because we have proven
it to be false.
You blabbing about someones bias? Oh now thats funny! Please explain
why you feel Saddams WMD's could not have been moved out of Iraq.
Months ago I gave you evidence of tons of chemicals found in Syria that
were traced to Iraq. You scoffed saying they were just chemicals
(deadly ones!!) and not WMD's.
That is complete absurdity you've tried to spew before. If that were
true then there is no point in anyone ever hiding anything from anyone.
We know they existed (UN inventoried them and sealed them, they later
went missing) and if your theory above were true then someone must know
exactly what happened to them and where they or their remains are. Nice
try Tom but your theory falls flat. Wheres the remnants or anyone who
knows exactly what happened to them?
Throw in a third party/independent candidate and everything can change, as
in the case of Bill Clinton who never won majority of the popular vote. I'm
waiting for someone with the moral fortitude to say what's right and what's
wrong, not what the polls tell him he should say just to get elected.
Majority vote doesn't matter, for better or for worse. If it did, Dubya
wouldn't be prez either. During Clinton's era, the third party (Perot)
did not affect the outcome of the election. If he had not been present
and the Republicans had gotten those votes, Clinton would have received
the same number of electoral votes. The race wasn't that close in any
Perot received the vast majority of his votes from Texas. Texas still
went to the Republicans by a HUGE margin.
Dubya claims that this is how he operates. I disagree. He is a pawn of
big business and special interests. On top of that, he's a moron. I do
think that polls should be considered in some cases. Afterall, that is
the voice of the American people. The country belongs to us, not rich
pricks from well-to-do families that spent their way to Washington.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.