I have a perfectly good beater Taurus (beautiful brown metallic...
NOT!) with 175,000 miles on it. Works fine, starts right up, doesn't
burn oil, etc. etc. Heater doesn't work, but that's another story. :)
I'm mostly happy for what it is: cheap transportation to/from work...
what I DO absolutely hate about the car is the wimpy, pathetic shifts
that the transmission goes through. I would think the car would seem a
lot peppier if the trans would shift faster, rather than laboring
through them like it does now. I'm sure a lot of this was probably
done to increase longevity of the drivetrain, but it's over the hill
now, and I'm looking to replace it whenever it dies... so if I can
either make it more bearable and/or hasten its demise, all the better.
;) I'm not looking to improve power, just improve driveability.
Is there any way to improve the shift profile cheaply, or will it cost
an arm and a leg (chip)?
Hmmm. Since it's a 92, I doubt it. Before that, the tranny shift points
were controlled by a Throttle Valve Cable. You could adjust the cable type.
However, yours shifts electronically, and the shift is computer controlled.
You could try disconnecting the battery, which would reset the computer.
Then the computer will have to relearn the shifting. Drive it agressively
and it should shift a bit firmer I think.
This would be a great question to ask over at www.tauruscarclub.com There
are a lot of knowledgable people over there.
If you're not at all worried about blowing it up, switch to Type F fluid.
I won't make a huge difference, but some. Sealing rings and bushings
will not last as long using old gold F.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:14:29 -0700, Christopher Brown wrote:
91/92 were the first years for the AXODE. A lot of them turned into
A 3.0 is a reliable motor. But even at its best, its no speed or torque
demon. And you want to stress a already questionable trannie even more?
If you want to play those games, get a SHO. You treat your 3.0 right,
you will get 200K out of it.
As funny as this sounds - there are a few exceptions to the "terrorist
bombs" AXODE tranny rule. I have a 94 SHO automatic and it has 143k miles
on it. My driving style has always been somewhere between aggressive and
borderline abusive since the day I bought it (around 60k miles). I have
always planned to rebuild the tranny with a shift kit and other goodies
when it finally grenades but it seems that it just won't die. I should
also note that I normally avoid burnouts - for obvious reasons - except for
those times when I just can't help myself - then I do them in grand
91 I believe was the first year for the electronically shifted AXODE.
And i think 91/92 were unique years with a different pin configuration
to the computer. There were some issues with oil in the planetary section
as i recall that had some mods during a rebuild to improve the situation.
Along with a host over other minor updates to improve reliability.
If one of these early transmissions were rebuilt with all the updates, it
should be as good as a newer one. If not, Anything over 100K is bonus
time on one of the early units. Feel lucky? I think by late 92 and 93
when they did the mods at the factory and beefed it up a little made the
AXODE/AX4S more reliable. Still not bullet proof, but better. If you had
a un rebuilt 91 with over 150K, go buy a power ball ticket.
Do a google search on lemon, taurus, and axod and i am sure you will come
up with plenty of information on this.
Just for the record, I have had a 89, 90 and two 93's and have not had
a trannie failure yet. But i drive easy and stay away from the trouble prone
While I would agree that the worst issues were fixed by 94 on the regular
Taurus, slap on a higher output 3.2L Yamaha engine from the SHO and you
have the recipe for bad things to happen. I can't even keep count of how
many dead trannys I have seen/heard of on the 93/94/95 auto SHOs. It seems
that anything over 100k or certainly 120k on the stock tranny with a SHO is
a bonus (unless you drive like grandma).
Oh, and I am already a member of the SHOtimes mailing lists
(www.shotimes.com) but I will check out the taurus car club.
Christopher Brown wrote:
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.