Banzai! Toyota in North America

Automotive News - May 14, 2007 http://autonews.com
Economic development leaders in several states say Toyota officials have signaled privately that more investment is coming...
Since it opened its first auto assembly line in Fremont, Calif., in 1987, Toyota's pattern in North America has been to go back and double its investment. The Georgetown, Ky., plant opened in 1988 to produce 200,000 cars a year. It now builds 500,000 a year as well as engines.
Future expansions probably will mean more investment in the $1.28 billion San Antonio plant, where Toyota began making Tundra pickups in November. Toyota also has a small assembly plant in Baja, Mexico, where it makes Tacoma pickups http://snipurl.com/Tacoma_07 - Nissan Motor Co. is investing heavily in Mexican production.
A more pressing concern for Toyota is to create more production capacity for engines and transmissions. The company has capacity to build about 1.45 million engines and 600,000 automatic transmissions in North America annually, while it is increasing vehicle capacity to 2.2 million a year.
Ray Tanguay, the Toyota executive vice president responsible for strategic needs, says the company plans to add a line at its Kentucky engine plant. Toyota declined to reveal details, but the plans are emerging as it launches production of Camry sedans at Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc. outside Indianapolis.
The company also will need engines to power the Highlander SUVs it will start building in Tupelo, Miss., in early 2010. That project is relatively close to Toyota's truck engine plant in Huntsville, Ala., but the company has not revealed its sourcing plan.
Woodstock, Ontario - RAV4 assembly is to start this year near Toyota's Cambridge, Ontario, plant, which has expanded repeatedly.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On May 21, 11:53 am, George Orwell <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-

The US automobile market is going the way of consumer electronics, unless US manufacturers can reverse the trend.
Yes, RCA, Zenith and a few well known American names are still used, but they are no longer assembled here. Most come from China, Korea, or Singapore.
Unless things change, there will be some vehicles carrying American name plates, but they won't be assembled here.
I am curious, what is the benefits package like for an American working at a U.S. Toyota, Nissan, or Honda plant like? Are the benefits anything like what UAW workers have?
-KM
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote:

The US Toyota workers just get 401k's, I think with a company match. The health care is more expensive.
So the wages are similar, but the benefits are less.
Jeff

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
But quality is better at non UAW plants. Union workers are lazy and overpaid. The bloated benefits package forces car makers to skimp on components and quality suffers. God help Toyota if they build in Mexico. Chhhrysler build sthere and there quality is spotty

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote:

It will be American cars from Korea (now!) and China. With German and Japanese cars built in the USA.
So we buy those that are built in the USA, who cares about the company name anyway.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
who wrote:

True!
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

Better, actually. As Detroit Free Press has observed in a recent article, Toyota is now at parity or slightly better than UAW wages. A lot of this is an effort by Toyota to stave off unionization efforts.
Ted
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Yeah, they're not stupid. The adversarial relationship that the union likes would cost Toyota a lot of productivity, and they'd rather pay extra to the people they have that work. Anybody would.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

likes
the
The question is, if the UAW disappears, would they still continue to pay those higher wages? Over time, I would bet that the wages would start falling after inflation adjustment.
Ted
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

Do you know _anything_ about business? Have you ever made a payroll?
Do you think the airlines, city and state governments, railroads, utilities, etc... would continue to pay what they pay if all union representation disappeared? <G>
Any properly run business pays what it costs to attract and retain properly qualified, dependable employees. Anything more is a waste of resources and a dereliction of management duties.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Right. A powerful union that you're not a member of gives you the best of both worlds. With the union broken, they'll pay whatever the market requires.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.