Looking for a mid-size domestic car recommendation

Page 4 of 16  
If her health insurance didn't pay to the terms and conditions of the policy, then go to court. However, IF she didn't have insurance then she obviously
_chose_ not to have health insurance before she got sick. That was a bad choice...a gamble taken and lost. It is not the government's fault for the choices we make. You certainly don't expect a company to say, "sure we'll insure you now for $300-$400 a month now that we have to pony-up $500,000.00...it ain't gonna happen. It's like asking a homeowners insurance company to give you a policy after your house burns down...it ain't gonna happen! Folks, get health insurance NOW before you get sick! The odds are very high you will need it!
| Sorry but I know someone who licked leukemia and has rheumatoid arthritis. | Real estate agent so self employed and earns about $60k a year. No one will | sell her health insurance. |
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
If you are laid off you can only keep the old insurance for a limited length of time under the law a few years ago. Not sure what the law is now. Also the rates can go sky high when you are laid off and take the plan private. Also the old company can lay off a bunch of people, discontinue the old health plan so the laid off people are not eligible to continue in the old plan. Then they start a new plan for the current employees. Or in some cases the companies go out of business leaving people without health insurance. I guess you live a sheltered life.

arthritis.
will
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Art wrote:

In the U.S., you would be taling about continuation under the COBRA Act.

True.
I believe they must make it available to continue you under the plan you were under at the time of layoff. BTW - If you get laid off and your previous employer tries to play games with your eligibility for COBRA or what's available under COBRA, call the Department of Labor - they absolutely **LOVE** to go after companies that try to skirt the law in this area. I called the DoL about something that a previous employer was telling me that didn't jive with what the COBRA Act itself seemed to say on the subject, and when I explained the question to the DoL, I had to hold the DoL off from going after them - they begged me to turn them loose on them. I was able to use that fact as leverage to get the previous employer to do what the Act required, and they changed their tune **VERY** quickly (sometimes I wish I had turned the DoL loose on them - they deserved it for several reasons - for one thing, they - a French-owned company - laid off a bunch of Americans in their U.S.-based plant in order to bring French employees over to fill the same spots - a big no-no according to U.S. federal labor laws. There were other sleeze-ball things they did too that I won't go into).

Always a risk, but you could also walk out your door and get run over by a truck too. 8^)
Bill Putney (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with "x")
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Bill Putney wrote:

Meant to type "...you would be talking about...
Bill Putney (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with "x")
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

An arguement that could always be inserted into any otherwise intelligent discussion.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Its called COBRA insurance when you get laid off or quit a job. Its expensive yes, but its insurance. Its not too shabby. You almost always get something in the mail after terminating employment in anyway. I know I always have. Plus I get offered the extensions on my insurance that I had with the company I worked for. You can buy insurance, there is just a cost. There are even insurance companies that will insure you regardless but you will pay a premium. ( a major premium, especially women due to the maintenece care).

one
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
I've been laid off before and you're full of crappola! There are many health insurance options out there from many different providers that will write policies with different coverage options. Have you not looked for them?
| If you are laid off you can only keep the old insurance for a limited length | of time under the law a few years ago. Not sure what the law is now. Also | the rates can go sky high when you are laid off and take the plan private. | Also the old company can lay off a bunch of people, discontinue the old | health plan so the laid off people are not eligible to continue in the old | plan. Then they start a new plan for the current employees. Or in some | cases the companies go out of business leaving people without health | insurance. I guess you live a sheltered life. |
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

health
Spoken like a true republican.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Hairy wrote:

If you mean stating the facts, you're right. You can get different types of insurance from many sources. They may not be cheap, but they're out there. And there are plenty of safety nets out there for those in dire straits.
Bill Putney (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with "x")
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Let me give you an example of a safety net. There is low cost subsidized health insurance available in most states for children with no coverage. But it is limited and on a first come first serve basis. The demand is much higher than the supply, at least in NC.

write
them?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
| > I've been laid off before and you're full of crappola! There are many | health | > insurance options out there from many different providers that will write | > policies with different coverage options. Have you not looked for them? | > | | Spoken like a true republican. | | |
And that makes it factually incorrect...how?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

What I'd like to know is: who promised it to everyone? The Constitution sure didn't.
--Geoff
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

basic
First you argue there is no class divide. Now you argue the lower class has no rights. Are you a constitutional lawyer or Supreme Court judge? Somehow I doubt it.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Geoff wrote:

Human compassion ain't your strong suit, is it?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
I'm curious, what percentage of you annual income do you donate to charity? ;)
mike hunt
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

I don't have a lot of compassion for people who demand "free" stuff that somebody else has to pay for. Especially when that "somebody else" is *me*.
Look, Dan, the group of people who want socialized medicine in America are the same ones who demand free car repair. There is a part of human nature that causes us to feel entitled to getting things at no cost. The better among us resist the urge to demand stuff for free.
Now there are things which government provides, however imperfectly, because it is most expedient for it to do so. Not the best, mind you, just the most expedient. National defense. Roads. The courts. Police and fire service.
But medicine? We need to nationalize 1/7th of our economy? And in so doing reduce the level of service to what can be found in Canada or Great Britain? No, thank you!
I *like* having well-paid, competent doctors who perform their services promptly because of the competitive environment. I *like* having a choice of hospitals, each offering different areas of medicine as their specialty. And I *like* having the benefit of living in a country with the best medicine in the world. Please *don't* screw it up because not everyone can just walk right in and pay cash! Don't make a great system not work well for *anyone* because it doesn't currently work for a minority today!
Please.
--Geoff
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Geoff Gariepy wrote:

When people who can't get or can't afford health insurance get the sniffles or a hangnail or the flu, they go to the emergency room because that's the only access they have to health care. Hospitals do not turn away ER patients because they cannot pay. As a result, all of us pay, and we pay a whole hell of a lot more than if there were some comprehensive system to take care of these people.

Source?
And even the best and poorest of us bleed when cut.

You seem to be confusing me with someone who thinks the US should have nationalized health care.

You seem to know nothing about the level of service in Canada. In Canada, most people with most ailments get the treatment they need quickly and efficiently and with great competence. (How do I know? Well, I've lived here for the past few years. How do *you* know? Sumpin' you heard on Rush Limbaugh?)

There is no lack of choice in doctors and hospitals in Canada. The notion that Canadians don't get to choose their doctors or their hospitals is a fabricated myth.

HMO's are "great"? Horseshit. If you want to talk about lack of choice in doctors and hospitals, HMOs are what we're going to discuss.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
If you have a problem with your HMO, you have the wrong HMO. I have been covered by an HMO for nearly twenty years. There are page after page of doctors, both GP's specialist, hospitals and pharmacies where I can go for treatment or medications. There are no lifetime limits or high deductibles, $10 for a GP, $25 for a specialist. I have never had a problem obtaining the superior services offered by my HMO and the fee is less than for lower, less comprehensive coverage, offered under Medicare or my previous BC/BS coverage.
mike hunt
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Daniel J. Stern wrote:

Yep. And when a lot of those same people with hangnails need a ride to get to the ER, they call 911. There's another flagrant abuse. Do we need a 'comprehensive system' to cover taxicab service too, Dan?

I'd like to know what you're calling your 'comprehensive system' if socialized medicine (a.k.a. nationalized health care) isn't the correct term.
>

You like punitive taxation for little in return, eh? Or is it maybe the 100 km/h national speed limit that was the big attraction?
Perhaps it was the climate!
:-)
How do *you* know? Sumpin' you heard on Rush

Actually, no. My source of information on the state of Canadian health care is from my Canadian co-workers who commute here from Windsor. And the truth is, they all carry U.S. health insurance at extra cost to themselves, because when they really need care they want to come *here*.
Anecdotal, I know. So is your assertion that 'most people with most ailments' blah, blah blah. In addition, I'll see your 'most people with most ailments' and raise you to 'most people with *all* ailments' -- which is the situation in the US.
And Canada's isn't a particularly bad socialized system. From my co-workers in Great Britian, I hear that the situation is truly dire. Emergency room queues that can last for days. (DAS care to comment?)

Maybe in Greater Toronto this is true. I occasionally listen to *Canadian* talk radio (you know, during the hours that Limbaugh isn't on here in the US) and hear the locals out in Canadian farm country bitch about how poor the health care is in southwest Ontario. I'm sure its worse in the other provinces, I just don't pick them up on my car radio.
Y'know Dan, Canada is just a few miles away. It's not hard for somebody in Detroit to know what the score is across the river. All I have to do is flip around the tuner and pay attention to what's going on.
You, on the other hand. are living in the single richest town in Canada, the one that Canadians all bitch about getting the lions share of the tax benefit. Then you try to extrapolate your experience to that of Canadians in general. Somehow I doubt that's close to being the case.
That being said, there are places in rural America where you don't have as many choices as we do here. That's one _big_ reason why I won't live in 'em.
There's a parallel health care system in America provided for our military veterans. My father-in-law is stuck with that beast of a system. I'm sure most anyone subject to the VA system would agree that *government run* system sucks ass. Who in their right mind would want to turn over more of our health care to the government after seeing its performance in the VA system?

I don't have an HMO. I've got PPO coverage. And it's just fine, thank you. I go anywhere I want to *in the world* and it's covered. And for the price of selecting a doctor that participates 'in-network' -- and it's a big network -- I go for just a minor deductible in addition to my monthly premiums. Paying for medical care just is *not* a concern for me.
I've had a choice of cheaper HMO-style coverage. I turned it down, knowing full well that you get what you pay for. So my paychecks are a little smaller than my HMO-choosing co-workers.
So what? Me, my wife and two kids are covered by the best damn medical system anywhere in the world. I'm willing to pay for that. Why isn't anyone else?
It all comes down to choices and priorities. If your priorities are such that taking care of your health and that of your family isn't paramount, then I guess you will eventually have reason to bitch about the cost of health care in America. Too friggin' bad.
What I truly dislike is the idea that because *my* priorities are such that health care IS paramount that I'm accused of being somehow less than compassionate when others who made poor choices complain and I turn a deaf ear. Natural selection at work, IMO.
Funny, there's a pattern here. I buy and pay for medical insurance the same way I buy and pay for automobile insurance. My risks are managed!
So what's the problem?
--Geoff
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:40:24 -0400, Geoff
I agree with a bit of what written in this portion

Not if you've got BUPA ( British Private health insurance) It allows for the 2 tier system to operate efficiently. Worked wonders for my In-laws to que jump when they needed to.
Here in Canada when we want quicker / more personal service we've got to travel to the US.
Any one that's truly happy with the CDN system either does that, or has been brainwashed into believing the propaganda that the politicians and health unions spread. (And yes that would be the same politicians who fly to the states for same day MRI scans etc)
I like the private choice of the US system. Though I do believe that a health "floor" should be provided for. i.e. ER & communicable conditions

I also agree with portions of the lower section
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.