Re: Toyotas & Honda ETC

While what you say is true, I believe he was referring to vehicles within the SAME price range, not all vehicles. After all the most common reason one picks a particular vehicle is what it costs.

tc wrote: >> Toyotas go too fast, Honda's cant stop >> >> does anyone think auto companies are any different in quality they use >> the same suppliers, same design shops, same material suppliers, assembled >> from parts from all over the world. some use the same tool shops for >> production tooling, same robot suppliers, etc. I know what the replies >> will be try and give some constructive feed back, not GM Sucks, UAW >> problems, overpaid managers,etc > > That's like saying "There's not much difference between different brands > of batteries (or tires as the case may be) - there are only three > manufacturers of all of them anyway - they just put different labels on > them". > > What you're saying is certainly true to a large extent, but the nominal > manufacturer can specify certain optional materials, processes, and > features from the same part/subassembly manufacturer that can very much > affect (and effect) reliability/longevity - just like they can make a tire > with a premium rubber compound or a battery with more "guts" in the same > plant (on the same line) in which they make the inferior product. > > Example: Do you think the nominal auto manufacturer whose headlights turn > cloudy after 5 years have them made by a different manufacturer than the > nominal auto manufacturer whose headlight assemblies are still almost > water clear after 12 years? Not necessarily. What base material did they > specify and pay for? Did they pay extra for a premium UV-resistant > coating, or did they pinch pennies and have one that is only so-so? I > fully expect you can get a variety of equivalent options from any number > of the handful of potential OEM suppliers. > > In that respect, the nominal manufacturer can choose the quality level of > every component based on their own formula of vehicle price point, > long-term public perception of their brand, etc., etc., etc. > > -- > Bill Putney > (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address > with the letter 'x')
Reply to
Mike Hunter
Loading thread data ...

You may be right, as that would explain the high volume of dodge neons and chevy cavaliers on the road, but what brought you to make this statement? I haven't seen any proof of that other than the volume of a certain car on the road, which could be just good marketing.

Reply to
Mudflap

One of my several jobs in the automobile business in my time was Group Sales Manager, for one of the largest mega-dealerships groups on the east cost. We operated 26 multi-franchised stores in six eastern states. We sold hundreds of thousands of vehicles from just about every manufacturer.

I can assure you the most asked LAST question we would hear from a buyer before they signed on the dotted line was, "How much is my monthly payment?," or "What amount do I need to write on my check?

That is one reason Toyota sells more four door Camrys than Lexus LS four doors cars. If a buyer can afford a Lincoln they are not likely to buy a Ford, unless it is something like a Mustang. Even then is likely a second or even third vehicle. ;)

You may be right, as that would explain the high volume of dodge neons and chevy cavaliers on the road, but what brought you to make this statement? I haven't seen any proof of that other than the volume of a certain car on the road, which could be just good marketing.

Reply to
Mike Hunter

"...In that respect, the nominal manufacturer can choose the quality level of every component based on their own formula of vehicle price point, long-term public perception of their brand, etc., etc., etc."

That covers cars within a given "class", range, or whatever you want to call it, as well as over all classes/ranges/whatever.

I mean, you have to admit that "etc., etc., etc." is pretty damn broad!! :)

Reply to
Bill Putney

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.