Toyota, GM, and Ford differences

You are free to spend your money wherever you wish. However my real world experience with several Lexus V8s is quite the opposite. I have not had a bad vehicle, foreign or domestic in longer than I can remember. I stopped buying Lexus V8s in 1999. The domestics I have purchased since that time have proven to be just as good and just as dependable. The only difference I have seen between them is the domestic brand costs me a LOT less money to acquire and replace than did any of my Lexus'

mike hunt

I've said or implied nothing of the kind. Suffering from reading comprehension problems?

Non sequitur.

How ironic, coming from a logically-handicapped top-poster.

It happens, sure.

Except that's not how it works. People have to read down below your response to see what the hell you're talking about.

Then you are an idiot.

(top posting corrected)

Only idiots think that top-posting is superior. Sorry.

You keep your cars for like a year, right? That's not enough time to see how good their quality is. How well they hold up over time is the key.

No, only illogical nonsense has been provided - the same wrong-headed nonsense I've read a hundred times from lazy, stupid, selfish, top-posting idiots trying to defend their lazy, stupid, selfish ways.

"It's easier for me, f*ck everyone else."

Which one of what does he use, top poster?

Oh, I see, we're supposed to read down into the message to see what the HELL you're talking about, and then go back to the top to read your response and try to make some sense of it.

So much better!

top-posting cretins tend to do.)

Idiot.

Dizzy, you are truly stupid.

We must be lucky. My wife's 2001 Sebring sedan has had ZERO problems. Runs like a charm.

However there are a few small things I don't like about the design, one being the very limited forward foot room for tall front seat passengers.

Dizzy, once again you signed one of your aliases to a post. Why do you do that all the time, we know its you LOL

DIZZY, as usual you have chosen to comment on something of which you have no knowledge. I keep my vehicles for two years then pass them on to my grandchildren or sell them to my children or friends. Some of them are held for many years as a result. My one son had my 2000 Lincoln LS, my first, which he gave to my grand daughter. It currently has over 90,000 trouble free miles on the clock. On the other hand my one son in law recently replaced the power steering pump on my last Lexus, a 1997 with 85,000 on the clock. The pump cost him $1,500. He replaced it himself since the Lexus dealers shop rate of $105 an hour was a bit more than he willing to spend ;)

mike hunt

I don't know anything about you, beyond this thread, but it is absolutely amazing to me that you come across like a 15-year old who read somewhere that botttom-posting is the only acceptable way to do it, and you're going to carry your banner all over the usenet. Honestly, you don't like what I say because I re: on top.... killfile me. It's a stupid argument, where you feel your way is the only.

dizzy wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

thanks. I tried it several years ago, and I seem to remember hating how it handled binaries. I switched to xnews and haven't tried much new since then. J

snipped-for-privacy@ihatespam.net (SgtSilicon) wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@nntp.charter.net:

You don't know anything about who, top poster? Oh, I see, you want us all to read down into the post to see who are are talking about, and then go back to the top to try and make sense of your post.

How ironic, coming from the person too lazy and selfish to properly format his post to maximize the quality of discussion. How VERY ironic, from the person who just wants to rant-away at the top, while ignoring all the points of the previous poster.

Wrong again, top-poster. It was immediately obvious to me that "quote and reply" is the ONLY way to have a quality discussion, and that only lazy, selfish idiots think that top-posting is superior.

"Oh dear, I don't want to scroll down." Umm... That's why proper trimming is performed. Just because some "bottom posters" are too lazy to trim does not mean that we should all abandon any hope of quality, point-by-point discussions and start ranting-away at the top.

The fact that you top-post is strong evidence that you have nothing of value lend to the discussion, no doubt.

It is the only correct way. Only idiots think that top-posting is the superior way.

You tried what several years ago, top poster?

Sure wish I knew what "it" was... Oh, that's right - the answer is down below somewhere.