1. Home
  2. General Motors Forum
  3. Any Easy-to-work-on small GM's ?

Any Easy-to-work-on small GM's ?

Hi,

I'm thinking of buying a new or used car to replace my 85 Chevy Caprice. The Caprice is leaking too much from the trans, costs too much to fix it, etc. Also 21 mpg hiway is expensive at $1.90 per gallon. The Caprice was easy to work on, and I did a lot of the repairs myself . Waterpump, alternators, spark plugs, oil changes, washer pump, radiator, and so on, and saved a small fortune.

Is there a 4 or 6 cylinder car that is known to be reliable and/or easy to fix, that gets 30 mpg or better hiway ? I've been thinking of Chevy Cavalier, Geo Metro, Chevy Malibu, and Ford Focus, maybe Ford Taurus.

I might buy a new one, to get the 10 year 100K mile warranrty (on some of them). Or might buy used, up to 10 years old, low milage.

Any ideas ?

Thanks

Reply to
User132384
Loading thread data ...

Personal preference: Buick Park Ave/Century, Olds 88/98 Chev Malibu Reliable as can be. Cheap on Insurance & on repairs.

The Geo Metro "can" sometimes be reliable *but* you cannot ever miss any maintenance or rust proofing treatments (the whole getting killed in an accident is what scares me away from the Metro's etc).

Ideally, if you're looking lowest cost per mile. a 2-4 year old Buick Century with winding windows owned by a Sr. No resale value for the dealer, babied since new Decent mechanicals if maintained.

Just my $0.02

Reply to
Full_Name

Thanks. I just test drove a V6 Olds 88 (2001 or thereabouts). Also test drove a

2004 Malibu. Both smooth and crisp. Thanks for the recommendations.
Reply to
User132384

don't you mean PA/LeSabre? Dave

Mir welle bleiwe wat mir sin (Letzebuergesch)

Reply to
munir fi Taiara Amudia

I can't think ANYTHING made in the last 10-15 years that could be described as "easy to work on", though a Cavalier is a pretty solid small car in my experience. Dunno about the Focus but my wife used to have one of the Mazda-built Escorts...it was miserable to work on.

Reply to
Bobby The D

Don't get the 3.1 or 3.4. Get the GEN 3 version of the 3.8 or the 2.2 Ecotec. Do your engine and trans research before buying anything.

Reply to
« Paul »

Malibu Classic or the new Malibu? The Classic is a nice car, lots of personality, dependability, fit and finish is a bit subpar though. The new Malibu looks a bit better and that Ecotec engine is neato.

formatting link

Reply to
Justin

So far so good on my 2000 Monte Carlo. Just get one that the intake manifold gasket has already been replaced ;-) (Then again that goes for an

3.4 GM car.)
Reply to
Eightupman

It was the Malibu Classic I test drove, with the 2.2 Ecotec engine.

Reply to
User132384

IMO, it's decent car. Stay away from the leaking V-6 engine. I would never buy one because I like to hang my arm out the window and it cannot be done on that car due to the very high door sills. If you never open the window, then go for it. Get a bigger inside mirror though.

Reply to
« Paul »

Reply to
none

For the DIY'er...I doubt that the Ecotec engine will come to be considered an "easy" engine to work on. It's a great little engine that is based on all the other all aluminum engines that GM is putting out. They have had 10 years of experience with the Northstar engine, and it appears so far that the inline 4.2

6 cylinder and the Ecotec are going to be fairly reliable engines.

Ian

Reply to
shiden_kai

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.