Here too...very, very few Ford's with DRL's (or Chrysler's/Dodge's/Jeep's/Benz's, or Honda's/Acura's, or Nissan's/Infiniti's, or BMW's, or Jaguar's either for that matter). It's probably fewer than 1% have DRLs among that list since it is a customer option (or a installed feature that is customer controlled by a switch) for those manufacturers. Obviously where people are given the choice, a large majority choose to leave them off (very few people want/like them...obviously!). Read the public comments at the NHTSA and it's probably somewhere over 95% in opposition...many calling for DRLs to be banned outright (won't happen, I'm sure).
But back to the Ford NG discussion. Perhaps the Op lives in Canada where DRL's are required? OR, he has DRL's confused with the "auto" light control...which sounds the most likely from the comments he's made. I can see his dilemma though. It would be impossible to be a private investigator with night survellience duties if one can't *fully* control the operation of their lights (a problem both with DRL equipment AND "auto" equipment when
*full* override controls aren't present). I know GM's policy only allows the disabeling of DRL's to government and military that request it on formal letterhead and also sign a agreement to re-enable them upon resale (why GM insunuates themselves in personal matters risking alleniating it's customer base is beyond me). But the says nothing about private investigators (that I remember) OR disabeling the "auto" light control system. Hmmm....