@ Chevrolet Classic Fleet?

Hello There:
I have a question about the Chevrolet Classic Fleet.
I just rented one of those from Budget (I believe it is a year 2005), and I like very much the way they drive plus it
gives good gas mileage. I would consider buying one. I researched online with the GM dealers but they don't have it for 2006, why aren't they building them anymore? Is there any problem with them? When I look for reviews it takes me to the Malibus. ???
Thank you for anything on the subject.
Regards,
Re.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
What is a classic fleet?

-
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
It's the pre-2005 Malibu rebadged as a "Classic" for fleet-only service. I don't think it's available for retail customers. If you like the Classic, look for a used 2004 or earlier Malibu. Sort of dumb on GM's part. Some people buy cars based on rental experience. Why create a vehicle that will be used for rental service that a person can't buy if they should like it?! <scratching head>

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

The vehicle you know as the 2005 Chevrolet Classic was in 1997 through 2003 the Chevrolet Malibu. In 2004 it was renamed the "Classic" and designated for fleet purchase only because Chevrolet introduced a new Malibu model. They're decent enough vehicles. We have a 2000 model which has been reliable. I can only speculate but they are probably being phased out because fleet orders have dropped to the point where they're not economically viable to make any more.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
re wrote:

That's the old Malibu. Personally....I wouldn't give you 2 cents for one.
Ian
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 02:15:20 GMT, "shiden_kai"

has had some of the usual GM nuisance issues (blower resistor, flakey HVAC control, front wheel bearing, intake gaskets) but I've managed to fix it myself each time without too much trouble. Parts prices are reasonable (well, compared to some imports they are) and it has been an enjoyable ride for the most part with decent performance & fuel economy.
166,000 km and six salty Canadian winters later, it still looks & drives pretty much like new. I know you work on them for a living. Could your opinion of the older Malibu be jaded 'cause you only get to see the problems?? (No flame intended, in my line of work we mostly deal with 'problem' people & some of us develop a cynical opinion of the whole human race as a result)
Regards, Al.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
===================================Hello There:
Thank you all for your replies. I sure know now a lot more about the "Chevrolet Classic".
Regards,
Re.
wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Al Haunts wrote:

Al, you are probably right. The main thing I don't like about them is that they seem to get real "loose" at about 80K klms and up. They are a cheap car and it seems to show when they get a bit older.
Ian
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.