Daniel Howes: GM-Chrysler deal would be frightful

Daniel Howes: GM-Chrysler deal would be frightful http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070219/AUTO02/702190345/1148/AUTO01
A tie-up between the two longtime rivals would be a tough pill for Metro
A ll this chatter about General Motors Corp. potentially buying the beleaguered Chrysler Group from its German masters has me thinking about Carl Valdiserri, an old steel guy from Dearborn. With his beloved Rouge Industries Inc. in bankruptcy back in 2003, he spent many days and nights looking for someone, anyone, to buy the assets Henry Ford first established at his mighty Rouge. But no one, least of all any American steelmaker, was interested -- except to buy them to eliminate a competitor.
"Every offer I know of shuts all or part of the place down," he told me then, as Russia's No. 2 steelmaker, OAO Severstal, was in the process of acquiring Rouge. "It's a damn shame we have to go foreign to get investment commitment to save these American jobs. We couldn't get a $4 loan to keep this business running. It's been written off."
The folks at Chrysler, gutting through another restructuring as their company is in play, probably can feel his pain. The signals coming from the German mother ship suggest they've been written off, too. Worse, they're suggesting Detroit's No. 3 automaker should be acquired by its No. 1 crosstown rival.
That would be a disaster for this town, for the United Auto Workers, for this state and for its largest automaker's efforts to stay focused and methodically fix its own problems.
A bad deal for Motown
Michigan's numbing job losses likely would mount, not slow, as the new entity rationalized operations to keep up with nimbler rivals. Product lines, if not entire brands, would be killed, with all that portends for people and long-suffering dealers. More tax-generating real estate likely would stand empty.
In a bid for market share, GM would get saddled with an estimated $18 billion in new health care liabilities from Chrysler, after spending the past two years trying to reduce its own crushing liabilities. GM would get more dealers when it needs less; more plant capacity when it needs less; more North American capability in engineering it arguably doesn't need.
The global industry's most successful automakers -- BMW, Toyota and Honda -- prosper largely because they have grown organically, not through acquisition and financial engineering. They have more simplified operating systems in manufacturing and product development. They have fewer brands, and the ones they have are more clearly defined in the marketplace.
It would be unwise to assume there won't be any kind of tie-up between GM and a Chrysler looking for its moorings. High-level sources told The Detroit News the two companies are in serious, ongoing discussions that started in December.
There's also talk of a joint project for GM to build Chrysler a full-size SUV based on the Suburban or to build a subcompact at its Daewoo unit in South Korea. Just asking, but why would the leader in both those segments -- the Suburban and Chevy Aveo -- want to build rival vehicles to compete against itself?
Follow the money trail
Which speaks, at some level, to the stunned response to the original report last week from Germany's Manager magazine saying GM was in talks to buy Chrysler from DaimlerChrysler AG. Seems to me the idea shows a superficial understanding of the core business issues facing Detroit's automakers -- but, then, I suspect that's beside the point.
The news reports and DaimlerChrysler's announcement that all options are open for Chrysler, including an outright sale, boosted the company's market value by $10 billion over five days. Shares closed Friday at $73.33, up 15.2 percent since last Monday.
That means two things: First, the market's jubilation at a potential Chrysler spin-off increases the prospects that it could happen because, as critics gunning to jettison Chrysler likely will point out, "the market" says it should happen.
And, second, DaimlerChrysler's top executives and shareholders, most of whom are outside the United States, are much richer today than they were a week ago.
-- "If they pull a knife, you pull a gun. If they put one of yours in the hospital, you put one of theirs in the morgue." Sean Connery, "The Untouchables"

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file

Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.