You totally twisted what I said. The comment on intellectual
discussions related to people who are pro and con and not just those
that agree with me. In no way did I attack others as those that I
mentioned had, I am sorry that you read it that way, but I guess you
wanted to, oh well.
The intellectual dishonesty I made reference to Larry was very much like
that exhibited in this response. You completely snipped all of the inserted
responses where I demonstrated your behavior to have been exactly that which
you were beating others up about, and elected to leave in only a comment
that you could freely make any claim you wished. Sorry Larry - you lose
Stop debating or punching in the air, it does not suit you. You are
trying to put words in my mouth, I clearly stated that the
intellectual comment was in reference to people who agree and who
disagree with me, enough said on that.
You want to act like I am just another clone of you, so bad it hurts.
Well sir, I am not like you. Thanks for your time, please drive
through, nothing more to see here.
The Mike show has veered off the tracks folks, I don't know if he can
remember what we were talking about, LOL :)
That has to be the biggest copout I have ever heard. Basically, you are
saying you have no points that make sense, you have no information that
makes sense, and everyone should dislike the DRL's because you do.
I never claimed to speak for all Canadians. You need to realize that DRL's
aren't some big conspiracy to help the terrorists, or to be used as
You know, something I can't grasp is why in the world we live in, with all
that is wrong, are you so adamant about getting rid of DRL's? Why not find a
good cause, and put your energy into that.
:), LOL, enough said. You expect people to respond to you seriously?
It would be best if you would take a moment and reflect on why you are
so combative. You see, in truth, there is no way to hold a
conversation with you, you don't take anyone serious, except yourself.
You continue to bad mouth others as if they are idiots, are you that
much better than everyone else? I guess you just enjoy the attention,
because you clearly just want to fight and make a spectacle of
Your comments do not changes the facts, whether pro or con. Other
folks, who are not playing games, understand what was said and your
comments do not negate this.
Don't have to, he was real easy to read. Through your repeated posts,
it is becoming easy to read you, as well.
People don't have to get acquainted with everyone to post, this isn't
a closed group, sorry.
Grab a clue. We have questioned many of your arguments, yet you can't
answer back. You snip important text out of a post, and respond to only
what you wish to. You have made an ass of yourself, Larry, and after you do
that, don't expect to be taken too seriously until you prove you are worth
Don't expect anyone to take you seriously either sir.
A reminder: This thread is a discussion of the pro, cons or
indifference towards daytime running lights.
Your comment is a personal attack and will not be addressed. If you
would like to carry out an intellectual discussion on the actual
topic, feel free. Any future personal attacks will be thoroughly
Thanks for your time and God bless
Once again, in other words: "I have no valid points. I can name-call, but
no one else can. I can't debate at all. And, of course, I am right, and
anyone who disagrees is wrong."
You want to talk about DRL's? I have owned 9 cars in my lifetime. All but
one (an '82) had driving lights. Everyone I know who owns a vehicle, has
driving lights. I see them everyday, and don't have a problem with them. I
talk to many people every day, and they don't have problems with them. I
watch/listen/read the news, and have not seen/heard/read of any problems
with them. All I have see is your "points", and they have been shot down.
Care to make anymore?
I am glad to know about your experiences in Canada. Down here in the
U.S., not everyone has them and a high number of people around here
disable them. The majority of U.S. spec cars do not come with DRLs,
did you realize this? By the way, my truck and my wife's car
originally came with DRLs but we had them disabled :). As I have
stated before, you cannot draw conclusions about the facts on the
basis of your own personal experiences. I am glad you enjoy the lights
in Canada, good deal. Here in the U.S., it is different and that is
why we are talking specifically about the U.S. market. So, I
appreciate your perspective, thanks for being succinct and to the
I did visit Canada in 93 and did experience glare. Of course that is
attributed to me personally but my theory is that when you get people
used to something they begin to accept it as normal when if given a
true choice they might think otherwise. But, I am not going to delve
into the mindset of Canada.
Wrong. For starters, you have not given any "facts". For seconds, if you
say to me, "DRL's cause momentary blindness" I *can* draw a conclusion from
my personal experiences.
As I have stated, I do not enjoy nor dislike the DRL's. They are built into
the car, and I don't have a problem with that.
How is it different in the US? How can you know more about the effects of
something that *I* see everyday, yet you don't?
Honestly, I doubt many even think of it. I have never encountered someone
with such an attitude towards tiny lights as yourself. Never anyone with
such a desire to get rid of something that doesn't even really do much.
Well, in some unknown way (actually glare is a good starting point)
the situation is different here. That has been established. What you
perceive in your area is not what is seen in mine, that is obvious.
Correct, it doesn't do much, but has a tendency to irritate others.
You could care less either way, so why worry about it. The kind thing
is to stop irritating people with something that doesn't amount to a
hill of beans. That is the point, it does irritate and offend people
who are trying to drive safely (here in the USA), so it should go. I
know you are neutral about it, I don't expect you to endorse a
viewpoint either way.
They don't make sense to you because you don't care and you don't want
them to. You would rather live in blissful denial that your actions do
affect others. Classic lack of debate skills or any facts that help
you to be taken seriously. Thanks for playing.
That won't happen. It has not happened throughout this "discussion", and it
surely won't in the future. Zealots don't make points - they make claims.
Then... they whine, accuse and attack when others question the basis for
their position. As you well note 80 Knight, for all of Larry's whining
about lack of real debate, he has not debated one single point. His
assertions have been challenged, and his response to those challenges has
been to attack the challenger. When one does not have a defense, one
resorts to attacking the challenger - now that's quite a debating skill,
I also wonder where he came from. It seems odd to me that someone would
join this automotive group, only to complain about DRL's. Especially as I
see he has made no other posts. But, I guess everyone needs a hobby.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.