Hey all,
I am sort of car shopping and as the Hondas tend to be very spendy (though very reliable) I see Consumer Reports has recommended the Impala, which seems to be doing very well keeping up with the Japanese name cars the past 5 years.
So, as I can get a used Impala for less than 1/2 the price of an Accord, I'm thinking that might be a good idea. Maybe around 50k on the car, between 7 - 9 grand, in that area. The Accord I test drove last week, cheapest on the lot and still 17 grand, had 60k (or more) on it I think, 2003. I just can't swallow that price! I don't care how great of reputation Hondas have, they're spendy, spendy to fix, and don't seem that much better as of late. Or am I wrong?
I can read reviews all over the place, but don't see much on Impala vs. Accord. And, frankly, I think the pro-Honda crowd can get a little carried away about them sometimes. Or maybe it's just a matter of spending the money now on buying a Honda, or paying a little to repair things later on a used Impala? I dunno, I'm not really married to either brand at the moment.
Any tips, advice, opinions? Would you recommend buying an Impala with
50k on the car?Thanks Impy