At the same time as most cars are in a downward spiral then Tato Nano
is experiencing a wild frensy.
People have already sent in payments for at least 200.000 cars and
Tato has only plans to produce about a 100.000 cars a year to start
No car producer in the world has any kind of similarity of problems of
not having enough capacity.
It seems pretty obvious what it is people want.
They do want cheap cars.
GM has been so far off the mark that it really amazing.
GM continues losing.
GM has already lost $82 billion since 2004, its last profitable year.
The Detroit automaker lost $6.9 billion, compared with a net loss of
$3.3 billion, for the same quarter a year ago
You are so right, GM is so far off the market I swear they must be
deeliberately trying to miss the mark. Maybe even decided government
taxpayers money is easier than making vehicles people want to buy.
BTW, the Tata Nano only costs $2,500 or so to make. Try paying Wagoner type
idiots $12M/year with $20M bailouts with that!
Which is really why GM has to fail. The market is now getting competative
and margins are going down to a point where GM could never pay off it's debt
if it had 10,000 years to do it. And that is if it figured out a way to
stop losing money.
GM is toast. The only question is how much tax payer bload sucking are the
corrupt politicians going to allow before they stop?
I think that a lot of US automakers problems are due to trying to satisfy US
and US consumer greed.
Too many safety and pollution rules and regs.
Too many lazy consumers who want 16 cup holders to hold their sugar and fat
Do we really need electrically heated and motorized outside mirrors with turn
Do we really need 8 air bags?
Do we really need tertiary fuel vapor control, ala California?
I would be happy with a basic Tata with a 3.8 supercharged engine.
Since getting bailout moneys, I agree. But before?
But by that, how come the others can comply?
I want it for unsweetened home made ice tea. Your point?
Where do you live? Arizona? Texas? Try that in the mountans in winter.
Heated mirrors add a lot to safety. So what if you drive a retarted
mini-can, some of us like style. Or simply, it isn't worth driving.
Helps when an idiot side swipes you. But agree, should be optional.
Agreed. But it is green!!! Plug the tailpipe and burn more GAS!
Government likes the taxes.
But agree, why spend $30,000 on a GM POC when you can get a Tata POC for
1/10th the price.
Perhaps, but pollution from cars is bad in some places. Every once in a
while I'll get behind an older cars, say 1970's adn older and the exhast
odor is obnoxious. Years ago we didn't know any better,b ut at least some
of the improvement is worthwhile.
Two cupholders are plenty
Don't need, but want. I like the ice free mirrors and ability to adjust the
right side mirror from my seat. Don't need the turn signal though.
Six should be enough for most accidents. Sure wish I had one when I was
broadsided by a Mack Truck in my Corvair.
No. Don't need those mirror heaters in CA either, but nice to have here in
I'd think the 3.6 would be enough in the Tata. Show some restraint.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.