Nissan Leaf = 367 mpg

GM didn't last long.... LOL...

formatting link

230 mpg for Volt? Not for very far General Motors trumpets its upcoming Volt; skeptics do the math. When dealing with electric cars, it turns out, your mileage may really, really, really vary.

General Motors astounded the auto industry Tuesday when it announced its Chevrolet Volt rechargeable electric car would get 230 mpg in city driving when it is released late in 2010. Unfortunately, you won't be able to put a gallon of gasoline in it and go

230 miles.

That's the brain-teaser confronting both car buyers and federal regulators as more electricity-boosted cars begin to come to market. GM's claim is mileage four times better than the current champion, the Toyota Prius. But is miles per gallon the best measure if you're not burning gallons? Many skeptics don't think so. "You can't give electric cars a free ride," a Consumer Reports blogger wrote. "That electricity comes from somewhere and needs to be counted in what the car consumes."

Rival Nissan isn't convinced either. Its all-electric Leaf is expected to arrive next year. In response to GM, its engineering team sniped on Twitter, "Nissan Leaf = 367 mpg, no tailpipe, and no gas required."

The Volt will be powered by an electric motor and a battery pack with a

40-mile range. After that, a small internal-combustion engine will kick in to generate electricity, giving it a total range of 300 miles. The battery pack will be rechargeable from a standard home outlet in about eight hours.

It all depends

It would be possible to drive a Volt forever without burning a drop of gasoline, as long as you didn't drive more than 40 miles before you recharged. Beyond that, the gasoline engine would kick in; with that engine running, the Volt would get more than 40 miles per gallon on a longer trip. However, the Volt could indeed get 230 mpg -- if you included the electricity-only miles and your trip was only about 50 miles.

On longer trips, though, every mile after that would reduce the "mileage." GM estimates the car's range on a full charge and a full tank of gas at 300 miles. If the Volt's tank took six gallons at that point -- the size of the tank isn't final yet -- traditional measurements would return the

40-plus-mpg figure. And even that doesn't account for the electricity introduced into the car's battery during an overnight charge.

The Prius and other hybrids such as the Ford Fusion don't require that owners plug them in; instead, drivers recharge their cars' batteries as they coast and brake while operating on gasoline power. The vehicles can move on electricity alone for only very short distances. The Prius achieves 51 miles per gallon in city driving, the Fusion 41.

With its promise of 230 miles per gallon, is the Volt for real? Dutch Mandel of AutoWeek and Brian Moody of Edmunds.com examine the claims. Nissan's figure for its all-electric car comes from methodology used by the Department of Energy, not the Environmental Protection Agency, which makes the rules. GM is marketing the 230-mpg figure after early tests using draft guidelines from the EPA for calculating the mileage of extended-range electric vehicles. The EPA guidelines, developed with guidance from automakers, figure that cars like the Volt will travel more on straight electricity in the city than on the highway.

But even the EPA is hedging its bets. The agency said in a statement Tuesday that it has not tested a Volt "and therefore cannot confirm the fuel economy values claimed by GM." The agency said it applauded "GM's commitment to designing and building the car of the future."

Reply to
Canuck57
Loading thread data ...

If you don't mind, can you post your source for that comment, since the http sited, does not seem to exist?

formatting link

Reply to
Mike

formatting link
The link worked for me.

Reply to
Tim J.

Maybe you and Higgins can get a room.

formatting link

Reply to
Scott

What? And join you and Mike? No thank you.

formatting link

>
Reply to
Canuck57

I found it, but it belies the negative tone of the post as presented.

For one thing regenerative braking can product a minor recharge and can NEVER fully recharge the batteries, however plugging in over night will, thus allowing a Volt, driven under 40 miles, to NEVER use ANY gasoline.

See below as quoted It all depends It would be possible to drive a Volt forever without burning a drop of gasoline, as long as you didn't drive more than 40 miles before you recharged. Beyond that, the gasoline engine would kick in; with that engine running, the Volt would get more than 40 miles per gallon on a longer trip.

However, the Volt could indeed get 230 mpg -- if you included the electricity-only miles and your trip was only about 50 miles.

On longer trips, though, every mile after that would reduce the "mileage." GM estimates the car's range on a full charge and a full tank of gas at 300 miles. If the Volt's tank took six gallons at that point -- the size of the tank isn't final yet -- traditional measurements would return the

40-plus-mpg figure. And even that doesn't account for the electricity introduced into the car's battery during an overnight charge.

The Prius and other hybrids such as the Ford Fusion don't require that owners plug them in; instead, drivers recharge their cars' batteries as they coast and brake while operating on gasoline power. The vehicles can move on electricity alone for only very short distances. The Prius achieves 51 miles per gallon in city driving, the Fusion 41.

formatting link

Reply to
Mike

I own four homes in three states, I don't need one. LOL

formatting link
>

Reply to
Mike

So what? I guess you never finished high school.

Think Conservation of energy. I guess you never understood it.

A perfect electric car would be able to not to just use motors to make them move, but also as generators during deceleration and as brakes, yes, brakes that don't burn out or wear out. Toyota is a decade ahead of GM, and GMers are so stupid-blind they can't see it.

Not only is it more energy efficient, it saves on brake maintenance.

formatting link
>

Reply to
Canuck57

Obviously you are not familiar with OHMS law, the basic laws of physics or ever heard of hysteresis, if you think you can return anything near the amount of energy used, with regenerative braking, dummy LOL

Reply to
Mike

Heard of all of them. And many you didn't mention.

Law of GM is like government, loose and waste money, especially taxpayers. Good-bye Money law.

But OHMS law isn't all you need to know about electric autos, in fact Watt's law is more important as it is watts that reprent the energy. And if you are metric kind, 3600 kilo joule/hour to a kilowatt.

Energy is never lost, it is however doesn't always go where you want. When you charge from a wall socket, or by using the generating capacity of going down hill or braking, the energy goes to heat, chemical and impedence. Not really lost, just a part of the energy makes it to retrievable state in the battery.

Green farts often overlook the mathematics of this equation. Factor in costs, and GM's Volt is a loser.

formatting link
Read and wheep.

Reply to
Canuck57

What you say is true, however you failed to address the point of the post and that is the fact a hybrid vehicle you can NOT return anything near the amount of energy used, with regenerative braking, dummy, and plugging into an electrical source WILL return the amount of energy used. LOL

formatting link

Reply to
Mike

You obviously didn't comprehend, it is true of ANYTHING to do with batteries and capacitance. Does not mater a damn if it is plugged in, running off a deceleration/braking, hydrocarbon piston motor or Flinstone feet.

But no one accused GMers of being smart.

formatting link
>

Reply to
Canuck57

Perpetual motion is an impossibility, dummy LOL

formatting link
>>

Reply to
Mike

Tell that to GM whilst sucking on the taxpayers.

formatting link
>>>

Reply to
Canuck57

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.