Re: Automatic seat belts do not protect

Have a question or want to start a discussion? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View
Mike answered my non-troll post:


I seldom reply to my crtics, but in this case, Mike's sincere intuition
appears reasonable on first sight, but is deeply flawed and deserves to be
corrected in the interest of truth:

1.  Complete research is impossible. Unlike aircraft center of gravity
specs are not published or even available from shop manuals or direct
inquiry from the manufacturers. Try to find this all important spec
yourself for all rollover calculations. (Old) Chrysler Corp. answered an
inquiry with "We don't know the c.g. of our cars" (! )  (exclamation mine)
2.  Rollover tests are conducted by manufacturers at the lowest possible
c.g. configuration: Light driver, no passengers, full gas tank, no cargo,
no roof load (SUVs, station wagons with roof rack). Level, smooth, dry
macadam roads are supposed to be used, but who is to say the test road
isn't sanded. Vehicles that barely pass when tested as described will
surely roll on maximum turns at high speed when fully loaded and with
minimum gas. These are the real world conditions in accident avoidence
manuevers.
3.  No tipping to 45 degrees necessary or has any bearing whatsoever on
this issue! A top heavy SUV or Pickup will roll from 0 degrees (level): An
overturning moment acting at the c.g. due to force generated by dynamic
centrifugal force, if speed is sufficient, the resultant centrifugal force
exceeds the available centrepital resistance at the c.g. and  cause a
vehicle to roll from 0 to 90 and possibly to 360 degrees or more in an
instant. Modern SUVs and pickups are placarded on their sunvisors with
rollover warnings.
4.  As for the big rigs, they are very susceptable to rollover, crically so
when fully laden. Their drivers know this and are very careful not to
corner hard, except at reduced speeds. All of us have seen the reduced
speed roadside signs showing the symbol of of a tipping big rig. Typically
a sign will have a 45 mph limit where a skilled car driver could take the
curve at 75 or better, limited not by rollover, but road friction, if
exceeded causes not rollover but directional control loss.

Yes, you are correct. Strike a curb or get tripped in a ditch at sufficient
speed and anything will roll. Do I still strike you as a troll, or do I
sound more like a knowledgeable person who tries to explain the physics
without the complicated math needed to prove my statements scientifically,
beyond rebute?





Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente   |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore   |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni      |For more info
                  https://www.mixmaster.it  


Re: Automatic seat belts do not protect



I guess we can assume you have never been to a NASCAR race where car spin at
nearly 200 MPH yet do not roll over, or watched cars spinning in circles in
car chase movies or watched the young  "drifters" at play, if that is what
you choose to believe  LOL

As to my credentials, I am a retired automotive Engineer.  I worked for over
thirty years as an automobile chassis design engineer.     Bye!   LOL




Re: Automatic seat belts do not protect



On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:03:10 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell


You are a troll, have been a troll for some time, and continue to
troll. The basic fact that you troll from a re-mailer is, alone,
sufficient to condemn you for trolling, but your off-topic, nonsense
trolls are tiring.

This thread, about automatic seat belts, which have not been sold in
cars for many years is conclusive in showing your trolling nature.



Re: Automatic seat belts do not protect






Site Timeline