I'll try to explain it to you once more, then I'll done. You are confused
about the percentage of return on the original
investment. The Civic is indeed worth more in dollar today than the
Contour, however the drive home price was not the same for both when new. A
new Civic was at least $3,000 more when new, than the drive home price of a
Contour when it was new. ;)
I certainly hope they do not pay professional wages for unskilled labor.
Did you read the article (link was posted to this group about a week ago)
about the woman making $74k for jantorial work? Do you think that is a
"fair" wage? Sure, if offered I'm taking it, but that does not make good
business practice. Defined pension vs. 401k? So what, it is the total
dollars, not the type of plan that makes a difference.
What does size matter? We don't buy by the cubic foot, we buy by the
material and what it does. Performance, quality, value. I'd rather have a
medium sized high quality car with lots of features than a huge clunker.
Yes, but is that a bad thing? Can we, as a nation of consumers, afford to
pay what the GM worker (or similar situations) is going to get? I don't
know. We compete globally now more that we have in the past.
What will I buy? I've not decided yet. Had my Buick transmission not cost
me $2600 for repair, I'd be driving a new Lucerne this month. That set me
back a bit and has me re-thinking the whole purchase plan that I had. Gas
prices will also come into play a bit more than they would have a few months
ago. Hell, I may even take a look at the Azera.
The only GM car that I Have any interest in is the Lucerne. Lacrosse looks
to much like my LeSabre to buy another of that look. I'd get bored too
quick. Chevy, Cadillac, and Pontiac have nothing of interest to me.
Hummers are just plain UGLY.
Ford (blah) and Chrysler (ugly) are of no interest either. That leaves the
Lucerne, Camry, Avalon, and Maxima, One of those will get my money later
Because of my years in the business, I am often asked what I suggest one
should buy. I will offer you the same advice.
Drive all those that suit your needs and get a 'total drive home price' not
just a selling price for each, then buy the one that best suits your budget.
You should also get a 'total drive home price' from at least three of the
dealers that sell the one you finally choose.
From what I see today every manufacture is building good vehicles that offer
long term reliability, you need not pay a premium to get a good vehicle.
With a defined pension one get a specific amount, for a specific number of
That is guaranteed once you have enough years to become vested. Even if
the trust fund
want belly up you are guaranteed your pension. With a 401K noting is
guaranteed, look at
those the worked for Enron for a worse case scenario
But why should you pay as much for a good small car with the same equippent
you would for a good mid size car that has a larger motor?
You missed the point you can buy a good mid size V6 GM for less than it will
you to buy a good 4cy Camry wiht the same eguippment. In my case I was
$42,000 to buy V8 Lexus; far more than I paid buy the V8 domestic brand that
too when I discoverd the Lexus I was looking to buy was going to be $55,000
saved so much mony on the dometic V8 I bought that I boudght a second car
same dealer. The domestic proved to be just as good and is some ways better
of the Lexus' I had owned. For one I no longer needed to buy premuim fuel
the Lexus dealer $300 or more every time I had the car serviced. ;)
Having owned a Toyota (1979 Celica GT coupe, I think it was called fastback
then), it was better built and tougher than my '82 Prelude (piece of junk),
'84 Skyhawk (even bigger POS), '92 Cavy (another j-body) and '95 Contour
(don't get me started on that thing, I'm about to test a quarter-mile run as
soon as I find a quarter-mile-deep hole).
To be totally honnest, I loved my 351C modded Tbird, even if it was a gas
guzzler. Pretty on par with the Celica for quality and reliability. I just
find my Contour a bitch to fix, and everything seems to be either flimsy,
broken or defective...
The only things I had to replace on that used Celica were the waterpump &
the catalytic converter when I got it at around 200,000 miles. The pump had
probably been changed at least once, I wouldn't know since I was the 4th
owner. That little car ran like a champ, took every beating without letting
I swapped the carburator for a bigger one (for performance, it was working
fine) along other mods & tweaks.
I had to let it go at around 330,000 miles when it encountered a '76
Montecarlo when that kid burnt a stop sign.
I miss that little bitch a lot...
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.