Running on Empty: Can anything save Detroit's automakers?

Running on Empty: Can anything save Detroit's automakers? http://www.newsweek.com/id/144522
Keith Naughton Newsweek Web Exclusive Updated: 3:18 PM ET Jul 3, 2008
I am driving a dinosaur this week. No, I'm not Fred Flintstone working in the rock quarry. Rather, I'm test-driving a Ford F-150, Harley Davidson edition pickup truck. It's got a big supercharged V8 engine that rumbles to life like a Harley hog. It's got a cool two-tone copper and black paint job, leather captains chairs embossed with the Harley logo, satellite navigation, moon-roof and power everything. This fully loaded ride has a sticker price of $50,035 and it's wicked fun to drive. But it also gets 12.8 miles per gallon and costs $123 to fill up. It's just the sort of big rig suburban cowboys couldn't get enough of back when gas was cheaper than bottled water (as they used to say in Detroit). But these days, this model is going nowhere. And neither is Detroit.
The complete collapse of the pickup truck and SUV market is causing a calamity in the Motor City. Auto sales drove off a cliff in June, falling to a 15-year-low. GM stock fell below $10 for the first time since 1954, reaching its lowest level since Eisenhower was in the White House and tailfins were the latest rage. Ford's stock is nearly as cheap as a gallon of gas. Factories are closing and workers are being cashiered at a breath-taking pace. And now the B-word—bankruptcy—is creating panic in Detroit. First, Chrysler fended off rumors last week that it was going bankrupt or about to be sold by its owner Cerberus Capital Management. Then, GM's stock tanked Wednesday after Merrill Lynch auto analyst John Murphy wrote "bankruptcy is not impossible if the market continues to deteriorate."
So is Detroit headed for the end of the road? Not yet, but there are certainly dangerous curves ahead. The Detroit Three are burning through billions in a race to overhaul their lineups from guzzlers to sippers. (Some analysts estimate GM is chewing through $1 billion in cash a month). And profits are nowhere in sight, as many of the new fuel friendly models are two years away or more. Ford just backed off a prediction that it would be back in the black by 2009 and now, like GM, won't say when it expects to make money again. Chrysler, which is now a private company that doesn't report profits, is seen as in the worst shape, since its is the most dependent on trucks, SUVs and minivans, and doesn't have the profitable overseas operations of its crosstown rivals. Those bleeding balance sheets—along with an anemic economy—are fueling the bankruptcy talk. "If nothing changes—oil prices stay high, the capital markets remain seized and consumers remain depressed—then Chapter 11 might be the only way out for all three companies," says veteran auto analyst John Casesa.
But that still doesn't make bankruptcy inevitable for Detroit. Far from it, in fact. Sure, Chapter 11 might allow them to get their financial house in order, while euthanizing dogs like GM's Pontiac or Ford's Mercury and paring their bloated dealer network. But the consequences of bankruptcy are more dire for a carmaker than for an airline or steel company. Consumers, analysts say, would steer clear of a bankrupt automaker, fearing there would be no parts or dealers to service their cars down the road. "Would you buy a Chevy from a bankrupt GM?" says David Healy, auto analyst with Burnham Securities. "It would do a lot of damage to their marketability."
That doesn't mean Detroit won't reorganize. It's doing that already, having shed a quarter-million workers and 15 points of market share this decade. It just won't seek the assistance of a bankruptcy court to oversee its overhaul. Instead, Detroit will either re-engineer itself or get help from the outside. Here are some potential scenarios:
The savior scenario. A big money player willing to gamble on a Motown turnaround could team up with a healthy automaker to ride to the rescue of a Detroit car company. The most obvious combo is Vegas billionaire Kirk Kerkorian, who has amassed 6.5 percent of Ford's stock this year, and Renault-Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn. Kerkorian already admires Ghosn for his legendary turnaround of Nissan. Kerkorian attempted to engineer an alliance with Ghosn and GM in 2006 that failed. Now Kerkorian is offering his help, and a possible cash infusion, to Ford. Might he again attempt to seek the services of Ghosn? Casesa sees that as a possibility, but it would require the Ford family to give up their iron grip on the company that old Henry founded 105 years ago. And that's not easy.
Strip and flip scenario. With GM and Ford's stock so cheap, private investors could snap them up for a song. Then they could break them up and sell parts to the highest bidders. Emerging players in China, India and Korea might relish the prospect of acquiring famous American auto brands like Ford or Chevy. (Remember, Tata Motors of India just bought Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford.). Old Detroit would fight this scenario fiercely, but when your stock is this low, it's hard to hold off the buzzards. The most potent poison pill against this scenario might be Cerberus's rough ride in Detroit.
Misery loves company scenario. There's been some speculation in Detroit that GM could combine with Ford or Cerberus could sell of Chrysler to one of its domestic rivals. The thinking seems to be that taking the best of each company—Chrysler's minivans, say, or GM's Cadillac line—and putting them together under one roof makes for a stronger company. But I couldn't find a single analyst who buys into that. All it would lead to, they say, is massive layoffs and crosstown culture wars. "That's just Detroit buzz," says veteran analyst Maryann Keller, "and it doesn't make one thimble full of sense."
The government bailout scenario. Remember Lee Iacocca and Chrysler? He was back at the company last week being lauded for convincing Congress 28 years ago to give Chrysler a free ride back to prosperity in the form of government loan guarantees. Keller now believes another federal bailout might be the only way to save Detroit. "Where else does the money come from to completely restructure their product line so that they have a future?" she says. The biggest problem with this scenario: Detroit—which fought fuel economy regulations for decades and rode the SUV boom way too long—is seen as a victim of its own arrogance. "Washington does not have any sympathy for what's happening in Detroit," says Casesa.
There is still an argument that can be made that Detroit will ride out this storm and eventually emerge smaller, but healthier. Cars like GM's plug-in hybrid Chevy Volt and Ford's stylish subcompact Fiesta are coming in 2010. And they certainly will be more in step with the times than the high-riding, gas guzzling Harley pickup truck I'm driving this week. The question is: Does Detroit have enough cash in the till to make it until then? Wall Street certainly seems skeptical. If anxious consumers start buying into the bankruptcy talk, Detroit's fate could be sealed. "A frenzy is being created and it's only going to make things worse," says Global Insight auto analyst John Wolkonowicz. "It could become a self-fulfilling prophecy."
If the long-predicted death of Detroit were to happen, that would be the ultimate reversal of fortune. The nation credited with putting the world on wheels would find itself dependent on other countries for its mobility. "Should we look to the rest of the world to provide us with cars?" asks Keller. "Should we be held hostage to the rest of the world for something so basic?" It's a question worth contemplating in Detroit's time of despair and Washington's time of renewal.
--
Civis Romanus Sum

Add pictures here
✖
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.