The new GM looks abroad

Note the 3rd and last paragraphs. Definitely not the company of the Dinah Shore commercial-

formatting link
Dead as a doornail.

The new GM looks abroad

formatting link
FORTUNE -- What will likely be the defining characteristic of the new General Motors has gone largely unnoticed in the analysis of its initial public offering prospectus filed earlier this month: the degree to which it is no longer a North American-centric company.

Already 72% of the company's vehicle sales already are generated outside the U.S. and that number is certain to grow larger in future years.

As GM moves more of its business overseas, it will have major consequences for the management of the company and its culture, the direction of its product development, and the allocation of capital.

With opportunity comes risk, of course, and operating in a large number of different regions and countries exposes GM to political and economic risks, as well as foreign regulatory requirements that are subject to change. Among those cited in the prospectus: economic tensions between governments, political instability, natural calamities, war, and terrorism.

Overseas growth could also lead to clashes with joint-venture partners, strains on corporate culture, and raise knotty issues about branding. A recent brouhaha over the use of Chevrolet's traditional U.S. nickname, Chevy, in overseas markets may give only a hint of what is to come.

GM's current international tilt is the result of a strong offshore push begun in the mid-90s under then-CEO Jack Smith. While Smith's strategy of buying stakes in overseas manufacturers like Suzuki and Saab failed, he understood the importance of the rest of the world from his experience running GM Europe, and it has paid off in GM's strong position in developing markets.

Nearly 40% of GM's unit sales now come from countries with emerging economies, notably the BRIC countries of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, which not so incidentally are also experiencing the industry's highest volume growth.

GM claims the number-one market-share position in China, where it began operations in 1997, and the number-three spot in Brazil. Across the BRIC countries as a whole, it finds itself the market share leader with 12.7%.

0:00 /2:16GM IPO's unanswered questions

Selling globally can be a marketing nightmare. In addition to its familiar brands like Germany's Opel and Australia's Holden, GM disclosed it will be selling cars under such unfamiliar names as Daewoo, FAW, Jiefang, and Wuling.

Customers may find it confusing too, as GM rolls out the Chevy brand around the world on vehicles that are about as American as the Eiffel Tower. In Europe, for instance, the vehicles sold as Chevrolets are made in South Korea by GM Daewoo.

In its prospectus, GM makes much of the fact that it plans to launch 19 new models in North America by 2012. But that pales in comparison to activities elsewhere around the world. GM's international operation, which excludes Europe, plans to launch as many as 77 new vehicles through 2012 in places like South Korea, South Africa, and the ASEAN region.

Besides enabling GM to leverage its global platforms and spread the costs of new technology, operating in countries with developing economies offers enormous potential savings.

According to the prospectus, 17% of GM's vehicles are manufactured in medium-cost nations like South Korea and Brazil, where wages and benefits run between $15 and $30 an hour. And remarkably, 43% of its vehicles are manufactured in low-cost locations such as China, Mexico, Eastern Europe, India, and Russia where all-in labor costs less than $15 an hour. That's about one-quarter of what UAW members in the U.S. get.

GM is directing much of its resources to China, where its Buick brand is well established and where it is expanding the number of nameplates sold under the Chevrolet brand. Because of China's rules regarding foreign corporations, GM operates through three joint ventures with Chinese companies: one for passenger cars, one for mini-commercial vehicles, and one for light commercial vehicles and medium vans.

The three joint ventures sold 1.2 million vehicles in the first six months of 2010 and produced equity income of $734 million. By comparison, GM North America accounted for just 1.4 million vehicles.

One potential irritant is the growing ambition of GM's passenger car partner, Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC), which may find itself competing with GM in the near future. In addition to producing Buicks, Chevys, and Cadillacs, SAIC also makes vehicles under its own name for sale in China. As GM's IPO prospectus dryly notes, "At present, vehicles that SAIC produces primarily serve markets that are different from markets served by our joint ventures," with the emphasis on "at present."

Besides China, GM is putting a big push on South America. It is creating a new regional organization, GM South America, headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil, which will begin business later this year with 29,000 employees. The new organization will have product design and engineering capabilities that will allow it to continue creating local cars and trucks.

As North America, as well as Europe, fade in importance to the health of the corporation, GM's direction going forward is clear. Not too long from now, GM's headquarters in downtown Detroit may seem like a corporate backwater compared to more exciting developments in Shanghai, Sao Paolo, and elsewhere.

Reply to
Jim_Higgins
Loading thread data ...

abroad

formatting link

As many other multinational companies have discovered then the wages and other costs in the US have become a liability and they have moved jobs abroad.

This has happened gradually over the years so it is nothing new.

Unfortunately for the people in the US this gradual move will stop being gradual and will come in leaps and jumps when the whole construction comes crumbling down.

The $ will lose its value and come back to make life miserable for a lot of people.

The printing presses, wars and corruption using $ all over the world is making the whole structure coming falling down.

Interestingly the end of the cold war 1990 is a key to when this really started to happen.

The US may have won the cold war but is losing its footing in the aftermath.

There are a lot of other companies who have done a similar runner with jobs to foreign countries with lower wages.

The unemployment is rising and nowadays it is mostly high paying jobs that are moving abroad.

The whole financial system is rocking.

The banks are full of bad loans.

The housing market is crumbling and it makes construction business grind to a halt.

The price of everything people need is rising.

The problem is the amount of $ and also the overproduction of durable goods.

GM has voted with their feet and ran away to foreign soils and so have many other multinationals done.

Reply to
Bjorn

abroad

formatting link
>

How true, how true.

Reply to
Jim_Higgins

Nothing new, GM has been operating around the world since before WWII.

Reply to
Mike

GM like most other manufactures that operate around the world, makes products in those countries primarily for the markets within those counties.

GM has been making cars in Europe for the European market since before WWII

Reply to
Mike

Well, what they make abroad, let them sell abroad. If we didnt allow these products to be imported to the USA, that might stimulate the American jobs.

We dont need another trillion dollar money bath and stimulus package. We need good government......something we have not seen in years.

Reply to
hls

Soon only GM products you can buy will be sold in Wallmart and made in china delivered from mexico.

Reply to
Bjorn

You are confused, the American auto manufactures import few of their brands. Most of what they build outside of the US is sold outside of the US.

The Japanese are by far the largest importers of the vehicles they sell in the US. In the case of Toyota it imports more than 50% of the vehicles that it sells in the US.

Reply to
Mike

Do you believe GM will become a Japanese corporation and follow their business model?

Soon only GM products you can buy will be sold in Wallmart and made in china delivered from mexico.

Reply to
Mike

That should work for Toyota, Honda, nissan, Kia, etc most of their autos are made outside the us, Also does all the money gm makes in those countrys be left there or returned to the us. Explain how this works for all the companys that rape us in the balance of trade to the tune of 60 billion a month

>
Reply to
Tom

I guess I am saying that we need a period of "protectionism", until we can breathe on our own. Toyotas, Hondas, Nissan, Hyundai - as far as those made here, should be treated as domestic producers. If you want to import foreign products, there should be a temporary protective tax system.

Now I know that global economists hate the concept of protectionism. But if you want jobs to stay here, you have to do something like this. Only until we get on our feet, I reiterate.

Reply to
hls

our govt started this by thinking American companies were creating a monopoly and thru tax dollars to foreign companies to come over here and produce witch they did but they imported all the cheap parts, engineering, tooling from their countries which caused our own companies to be non completive. and so the snowball continues to grow.

Reply to
Tom

Protectionism will only work in a very short timespan and then it usually becomes counterproductive.

The problem is obviously that the $ has too high a value so the jobs in the US are too expensive.

The $ will decrease in value as time goes by and then this trend will stop.

The standard of living reached a maximum in the US compared to the rest of the world and the change of going down in standard is starting.

It will be a very difficult time for some groups.

Increasing standard of living is relatively easy and getting more value for everyone is easy.

Managing decrease and less value will cause a lot of tension.

There are always groups fighting for the members of the group.

The fights will intensify.

Most groups try to get as much of public money as possible.

The gain for the groups members is always significant while the loss to the rest of the world is relatively low per person.

Then you have a difference between local groups and groups that are based far away.

The local groups create some spin offs to their neighborhoods while groups that are based far away usualy rob everything they can and leave the community flat broke.

So the best option is to be a member of a group that is doing well and the worst is to be in a community where the robbers do not give anything back.

While GM was based in the US it was good for their communities.

Now GM has hardly any interest in anything in the US anymore because there is not much left to rob.

Reply to
Bjorn

For the last paragraph, it is already true.Except for perhaps Ford trucks, Detroit is walking dead in the business.

But this highlights why the government should forget the IPO for now. Sell off GM China while it is worth something.

GM isn't going to survive as a world company. They don't have what it takes in their own back yard. Even the government now realizes GM is a turkey and wants so bad to dump it. Once GM China is sold, then package up GM and fire sale it for 1 cent on the dollar. It prevents the tax sucking. Take the GM China sale moneys and run.

Reply to
Canuck57

Wages also are declining, with new hourly production workers starting at $14 an hour instead of $28.

The combined cuts reduced Detroit-based GM=92s average labor cost to $58 an hour from $74 two years ago.

The new $14-an-hour workers, which could account for 20 percent of the labor force eventually, will drive GM, Ford and Chrysler=92s hourly costs below the $56 for Toyota Motor Corp.=92s most senior U.S. hourly workers.

The jobs banks are gone.

Workers are forced to move if they want to keep working when a factory cloases.

Reply to
Bjorn

To say they have no interest in the US anymore is totally wrong between the manufacturing facilites, dealerships. corporate headquarters, the capital wealth of the corp. is in the US and North America. That cant be matched by anyone but Ford, The profits of the offshore companys shows up in the corporate balance sheet. Just as it does for the Jap, and Korean companys. This is GM bringing some money back to the US and helping to reduce the balance of trade. We lose 60Billion a month to foreign countrys that's worth more than the total bailout money and there is no return on this loss. Everyone here complains about the bail out of us companys and no one complains about the 90 billion that went from the AIG bailout to Germany, France, China as a gift of 100cents on the dollar, no chance of return but you can bet someone profited from the money, maybe more campaign contributions.

Reply to
Tom

What the US government should do is what the Japanese government has been doing, ever since the end of WWII for their corporations and that is pay for all of their R&D from the taxes paid on their profits.

Reply to
Mike

Not to worry, BO(ZO) and the Dims in Congress are doing all the robbing today but it is in trillions of dollars, rather than billions ;)

Protectionism will only work in a very short timespan and then it usually becomes counterproductive.

The problem is obviously that the $ has too high a value so the jobs in the US are too expensive.

The $ will decrease in value as time goes by and then this trend will stop.

The standard of living reached a maximum in the US compared to the rest of the world and the change of going down in standard is starting.

It will be a very difficult time for some groups.

Increasing standard of living is relatively easy and getting more value for everyone is easy.

Managing decrease and less value will cause a lot of tension.

There are always groups fighting for the members of the group.

The fights will intensify.

Most groups try to get as much of public money as possible.

The gain for the groups members is always significant while the loss to the rest of the world is relatively low per person.

Then you have a difference between local groups and groups that are based far away.

The local groups create some spin offs to their neighborhoods while groups that are based far away usualy rob everything they can and leave the community flat broke.

So the best option is to be a member of a group that is doing well and the worst is to be in a community where the robbers do not give anything back.

While GM was based in the US it was good for their communities.

Now GM has hardly any interest in anything in the US anymore because there is not much left to rob.

Reply to
Mike

How many factories have been "cloasing" where you live?

Wages also are declining, with new hourly production workers starting at $14 an hour instead of $28.

The combined cuts reduced Detroit-based GM?s average labor cost to $58 an hour from $74 two years ago.

The new $14-an-hour workers, which could account for 20 percent of the labor force eventually, will drive GM, Ford and Chrysler?s hourly costs below the $56 for Toyota Motor Corp.?s most senior U.S. hourly workers.

The jobs banks are gone.

Workers are forced to move if they want to keep working when a factory cloases.

Reply to
Mike

You are confused American corporations operating in place like Europe, pay taxes to those countries on the profits they earn in those counties. Unlike the Japanese corporations that earn profits in the US. Japanese corporations profits earned in the US are returned to Japan, US corporate tax free, to be return to Japanese corporations for R&D

Reply to
Mike

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.