Union rule change sets back workers

Union rule change sets back workers http://tinyurl.com/2p6z9a
SPRING HILL, Tenn. -- When Steve Stidham moved to Saturn's own assembly plant in Spring Hill, Tenn., in 1996, he willingly signed away 19 years
of General Motors Corp. seniority rights for the promise of a steady job at what GM billed as a new kind of car company -- one built to take on the likes of Toyota with a fuel-efficient lineup, no-haggle pricing, outstanding customer service and a factory free of many traditional union work rules.
Giving up those rights was a non-issue at the time, he and others at the plant told the Free Press, because all new Saturn workers gave up their GM starting dates to get in the door. And in those early days at the plant, getting in the door often meant escaping older, traditional GM plants as the company closed them or reduced the assigned workforces. Stidham moved from Dayton, Ohio.
Advertisement But it became an issue with a local agreement approved in 2004, when the UAW and GM agreed to fold the Saturn brand back into the general corporate manufacturing operation.
That means GM will build more than Saturns at the Tennessee plant, but also that some of the old rules are now in effect there, too. Now workers like Stidham are worried that they will lose out to other members who don't have to surrender seniority from other plants.
The matter is at top of their minds, because up to 300 Delphi Corp. workers are now eligible to transfer to Spring Hill -- and bring all of their so-called corporate seniority with them.
"Any Delphi people coming into Saturn can bring seniority back to 1985," Stidham said, referring to the Spring Hill plant as "Saturn." "If they've got close to 30 years and transfer here, they can step over the top of anybody down here."
The seniority issue doesn't affect worker pensions or the amount of vacation time they receive, but it does affect in-plant bids for shift preference, job selection and when they can take vacations. Those issues are all determined by the seniority date recognized at the plant.
The matter highlights some of the unintended consequences of the patchwork of contracts the UAW negotiates, particularly as employers struggle through steep losses, restructurings and even bankruptcies. The UAW is currently in talks with the Detroit automakers on new national contracts, in which the union will weigh the needs of retirees and future workers with those of current workers, who must ratify the agreement.
This Saturn issue, which springs from Delphi's bankruptcy, is another example of constituents with conflicting needs.
In the recent UAW-negotiated deal with GM and its former supplier division, the union protected the jobs of up to 300 Delphi workers in Athens, Ala., by negotiating for them to be allowed to transfer about 80 miles north to the Spring Hill plant as jobs are available after the Delphi plant closes, which could happen as soon as late next year.
"The international union took care of us here in Athens," said Greg DeMike, chairman of UAW Local 2195 in Athens. "They got us a soft landing on this."
Under the deal that allows Delphi to proceed with a plan to become a private company led by Appaloosa Management LP, senior union members who stay with Delphi at lower wages get up to $105,000 in buy-downs. Others can retire or go to a GM plant, if there is one that needs to make hires.
DeMike and other members of Local 2195 said they are proud of the work the UAW did to protect their jobs and hope workers in Spring Hill will welcome them.
Jerry Rutherford, 50, another Spring Hill veteran who already is outranked at his plant by people who have worked for GM less time than he has, said he doesn't begrudge Delphi workers from Alabama who will be able to move to Spring Hill and has no animosity toward them. But he would like the union to restore the seniority so everyone is on the same footing.
"The union needs to fix this," said Rutherford, who started at GM in 1979 and moved to Spring Hill from Buick City in Flint. "The local allowed it ... and I feel like International turned their back to me."
Unlevel playing field
GM and the UAW have a rule that allows most GM workers who transfer to another plant to bring their seniority with them as far back as Jan. 7, 1985. But the Spring Hill workers who gave up the rights that determine such things as job selection and when they can take vacations can only carry their Saturn start dates with them.
More than 1,000 Spring Hill members who gave up GM seniority to join Saturn when the idea was that everyone would start fresh at Saturn say they believe the union should restore the same rules for them that affect other GM workers, basically honoring all of their years working for GM and divisions now incorporated into GM's manufacturing operations.
When those union members moved to the plant, everyone rotated to every shift and no one was permanently assigned a job, workers said. Most of the things traditionally determined by seniority in a plant were no longer going to be determined by seniority under Saturn, they said, so fighting to keep GM seniority seemed unnecessary.
"Signing away seniority wasn't a big deal because seniority wasn't an issue," said Kenny Vaughn, 47, who has worked at GM since 1981 and transferred to Saturn in 1992 from Lansing. But, he argued, now that it's no longer the case, the union should restore equal footing.
Some workers who entered the Spring Hill plant, which is now a general GM assembly plant in the process of being retooled for a new product, favor keeping things the way they are. Many of them enjoy the benefits of higher seniority because of the changed rules, and others simply argue that the older workers did what was best for the time and a better deal was made later. They understand the situation could be frustrating, but don't believe it requires a change.
GM committed to assigning a new product to Spring Hill as part of the negotiations to pull Saturn and its Spring Hill workforce back into the GM global manufacturing system. Earlier this year, GM North America President Troy Clarke told workers they will be building a new Chevrolet crossover SUV, based on the same architecture as the Buick Enclave, Saturn Outlook and GMC Acadia built in Lansing.
The only thing that didn't change when Spring Hill switched to GM from being purely a Saturn plant were the seniority rules, workers affected by the change said.
And shortly after ratification of the contract under which Saturn was folded back into GM, workers said, the local union held a vote to answer the seniority complaint by reinstating all Saturn workers' corporate seniority rights. The vote passed, about 1,700 votes to 1,500 votes, more than a dozen workers told the Free Press during a visit to Spring Hill. But the local union representatives said they could not reopen the contract, according to rank-and-file union members.
Local UAW officials in Spring Hill had said they would speak about the issue, but after national contract talks began they were no longer available to discuss the matter.
General Motors officials declined to comment for this report. The UAW International union declined to comment on the specific issue, but said situations like this are not unique.
Balancing act
Labor experts said the dispute underscores the challenges the UAW faces negotiating a national contract and individual local contracts for each of its plants.
"This isn't a new issue," said Michael Whitty, a professor and labor expert at the University of Detroit Mercy. "The union is trying to protect as many of its members as possible in the fairest way possible" as the U.S. auto industry shrinks.
In the process, he said, things like the Spring Hill issue will occur, where member constituencies covered by varying specific agreements occasionally experience friction.
"I think the union has a defensible situation with all of the weights at play that it is working to balance," Whitty said.
David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, agreed and said the union and GM are likely to work to solve the issue with some package of signing bonuses, buyouts or enticements for early retirement, as they have been doing for the past few years.
"You have to come up with something that is a special deal to create buy-in," Cole said. "But the union, first, has been focused on the bigger picture of getting a new product into that plant. A new product is a future ... then you figure out how to deal with the local issues."

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file

Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.