Where is the stimlulus mony going?

Page 4 of 8  


Higgins, why don't you go home and "plonk" your boyfriend. You have trolled enough for one day.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Mike wrote:

If you didn't want it to happen, you shouldn't have voted for the incompetent GW Bush in the first place. Remember, the projected $1.5 trillion deficit is for GW Bush's last budget, which is in effect until October.
Remember: The last Republican president to balance the budget was Eisenhower. IOW no Republican president will ever balance the budget again.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Perhaps, but you are forgetting that no President has added ANOTHER 1.5 Trillion and proposed an ADDITION 3 Trillion to the National debt, on top of that 1.5 Trillion in just his first six month in office as is BO.
NO President has had the GDP DROP and the income to the US Treasury DROP since the Great Depression as they have under BO and the are Dims by spending money we do have.
The last President to put in place polices that resulted in double digit inflation, interest rates and unemployment was Jimmy Carter and BO is making him look good.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Correct. However, it is Bush's budget, not Obama's. Obama gets his first Budget starting in October. And the economic problems were not Obama's. As you may recall, the recession started while Bush was in office; however, the economic mess is due to the inaction of both Democrats and Republicans.

Please, don't blame that on Obama. The recession started with Bush in the White House.

Yet, the recession started with Bush in the White House.
Jeff

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Recessions don't cause deficits, governments do by spending more than they take in. Please tell us you understand this extremely simple concept.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
The Dims know very well that historical record proves that Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Bush all GREW the economy, and increased the income to the US Treasury, by lowering tax RATES, but when you do that you can not control WHO get what and buy their votes.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
VA right. LOL

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Mike wrote:

You are one sorry person with the cognitive ability of a retarded turnip. You know nothing Mikey.
--
Civis Romanus Sum

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
What makes you believe it is delusional babble? What information to you have to the contrary? LOL

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Mike wrote:

Actual, verifiable facts rather than the conjured up mania you present. You are not worth wasting bandwidth on.
--
Civis Romanus Sum

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
What an amazingly baldfaced liar you are.
"President Bush's budget chief blamed the faltering economy and the bipartisan stimulus package for the record $482 billion deficit the White House predicted for the 2009 budget year."
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/28/2009.deficit/index.html
Bozama has single handedly more than quadrupled the projected 2009 deficit with the aid of the morons running the Congress.
wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

I'm amused at GDP numbers, blaming Bush for pre-existing deficits, and the like.
So, if people believe that all of this deficit spending is Bush's fault, why do these same people believe that it's now okay to add an additional $1 trillion to the deficit at this point in time?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Because the Messiah has some special appeal to their drug-addled micro- brains.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
PLEASE! Do you not know logic has no place in these discussions? ;)
said:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
In your case, facts have no place either. Let's look at one of your lies.
* Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and Americorps to sign up individuals for Government-run Health Care plan.
The actual legislation contains absolutely no mention of anything remotely supportive of your lie.
Let's look at another one of your lies:
* Page 42: The "Health Choices Commissioner" will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None.
Oops. Nothing like that in the bill, either.
Why are you lying?
said:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
That is what you say, what is your source that shows that will NOT be the result if Obamacare is enacted. Why are you not being factual?
said:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Go to the actual legislation, and using the text search feature in your PDF reader, find proof about ACORN or Americorps. There is no mention of anything remotely resembling that idea.
Here's the link: http://help.senate.gov/BAI09A84_xml.pdf
Here's the thing you need to prove: * Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and Americorps to sign up individuals for Government-run Health Care plan."
I'm waiting for you to back up this SINGLE "FACT" with proof from the actual legislation, including page number.
said:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Again you posted the "Short Bill," listing the Section but not the sections were one can peruse the actual law, not just a list of subsections.
I E what is IN the following sections?
''Sec. 2701. Fair insurance coverage.
''Sec. 2702. Guaranteed availability of coverage.
''Sec. 2703. Guaranteed renewability of coverage.
''Sec. 2704. Bringing down the cost of health care coverage.
''Sec. 2706. Prohibiting discrimination against individual participants and
beneficiaries based on health status.
''Sec. 2707. Ensuring the quality of care.
''Sec. 2708. Coverage of preventive health services.
''Sec. 2709. Extension of dependent coverage.
''Sec. 2710. No lifetime or annual limits.
PART II-provision APPLICABLE TO THE GROUP M, WHAT IS Group M?
1. What is defined in the bill as "Fair insurance coverage?
2. What is the "beneficiaries based on health status'"
3. What will the bill do in "Bringing down the cost of health care coverage?"
4. How does the bill define "Extension of dependent coverage" and on and on, the people WANT to know?
Below is a part of a PA law, Title 75 the Motor Vehicle Code, where one can see that actual wording by going the section and read the law AS DEFINED, not just it sections. That is what you are posting and there is wording in the healthcare bill that gives local originations, like ACORN etc. authority in the law to do certain things. The bill is filled with the word SHALL that makes it MANDATORY
75 Pa.C.S. 3304
CHAPTER 3301 RULES OF THE ROAD IN GENERAL
Right-of-way. (Sees. 3321-3326)
Turning, starting and signals.
(Sees. 3331-3336)
Special stops required.
(Sees. 3341-3346)
Stopping, standing and parking.
(Sees. 3351-3354)
Speed restrictions. (Sees. 3361-3368)
SUBCHAPTER A GENERAL PROVISIONS
3303. Overtaking vehicle on the left.
(a) General rule.-The following rules shall govern the overtaking and passing of vehicles proceeding in the same direction, subject to the limitations, exceptions and special rules stated in this chapter:
(1) The driver of a vehicle overtaking an other vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left of the other vehicle at a safe distance and shall stay to the left of the other vehicle until safely clear of the overtaken vehicle.
(2) Except when overtaking and passing on the right is permitted, the driver of an over taken vehicle shall not increase the speed of the vehicle until completely passed by the overtake ing vehicle and shall give way to the right in favor of the overtaking vehicle on suitable signal.
(b) Suitable signal defined.-Suitable signal for purposes of subsection (a)(2) shall be as follows:
(1) At all times when head lamps are re quired to be lighted according to section 4302 (relating to the period for requiring lighted lamps), an audible signal or the intermittent flashing of low and high beams except that the use of high beams shall not be permitted when a vehicle is approaching from the opposite direc tion within 500 feet.
(2) At all other times, an audible signal.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Are you going to believe this source? How can you do something "single handedly" when you have the aid of someone (Congress)?
The quote doesn't include the aid of financial companies that sold mortgages that people could not possibly be repaid as well as the poor oversight by Bush's administration, Clinton's adminstration and both the Democrats and Republicans in Congress.
Jeff

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Bozama proposed it, Congress rubber stamped it, our CHILDREN and GRANDCHILDREN are paying for it. Sounds fair right?

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.