If the road doesn't allow them to pass I shake them off on the curves,
but only on left curves to save oncoming traffic if they cross the
center line. I don't want them following too close, else they'll hit me
if I have to stop or slow down quickly. By leaving enough space in
front of my car to give them stopping distance as well, they get even
My how mad they become when then suck in and try to stick with me on the
curves. A few have lost it and gone to the shoulder, even though my mid
sized car is well below it's cornering limit.
Eventually when they (thank goodness) pass on a double lane section I
have a smile as they give me ugly looks.
On 1/17/06 4:54 PM, in article
I believe you need a CDL with air brake endorsement, regardless of whether
you pull a trailer or not. From a safety standpoint, I'm with you on that
one. Not sure what the mileage would be just bobtailing, but the extra $$ is
worth the peace of mind.
Yeah, you sure are showing your independent minded ways. Sort of like
the kid who wants to be different, just like all his/her friends.
The issue is that your "choice" does not only have consequences for you,
but for everyone else as well. If you are not paying close enough
attention some day and t-bone another vehicle, you and your monster
truck are much more likely to kill the other person than if you were
driving a vehicle appropriate to your actual needs.
Also, when you burn through fuel at 10 MPG you are drastically raising
prices for everyone else, not just yourself. Small changes in the
gasoline supply:demand ratio drive large changes in retail gasoline
prices. Thus, fuel hogs are raising costs dramatically for everyone else.
Your choices have consequences for everyone else, yet you seem to care
not a bit about that.
Which is not so different from the equally rediculous rant that cries about
everyone else out there not taking care of "me" because of the decisions
I've made for myself... as evidenced below.
Equally - the person in that "socially concious" vehicle could just as
likely be responsible for not paying attention, and being the real cause of
the accident. But then, it's not as dramatic if presented that way.
Then again there's the concept that the owner of stouter vehicles actually
care more about the safety of themselves and their families than they do
about "social conscience". Not a bad thought. They like the increased
advantage of surviving an accident in a vehicle that provides some degree of
protection. You choose to lessen the significance of that benefit and put
your family at greater risk, and then pummel others because you consciously
decide to take this course? Silly. It's not a matter of a battering ram
plowing into the side of your vehicle - you totally ignore the advantage of
stouter vehicles in one car accidents.
Even my '94 full size pickup, which serves utilitarian purposes that cannot
be served by any of my cars, gets 15mpg. But then again, it does sound more
dramatic to say something like 10mpg, in attempt to impress a point, doesn't
it? "Fuel hogs" as you call them, have no dramatic effect on fuel costs for
everyone else. The principle of supply and demand says that the overall
demand will drive the price relative to supply. Since the "10mpg" vehicles
are the exception on the roads, they have a negligible impact on the price
of fuel. Common mileage realizations for SUV's on the road today is really
closer to 20mpg, but that too would less dramatic, wouldn't it?
You choices have consequences which you are trying to place on the shoulders
of others. You have chosen to drive a vehicle that puts you at a distinct
disadvantage in a collision and expect others to be concerned for your
safety. Your safety is your concern and you have the responsibility for it.
You chose to put economy over safety. That's your choice, but don't whine
about others and the impact they could potentially have on you because of
Been driving 10 years, no accidents. Although I did get a parking
ticket on University grounds once.
Not really. OPEC sets the price. Just because there is a great demand
for something doesn't mean it should be more expensive. Take water for
example. If I own a pool and fill it with water, am I drastically
raising prices for everyone else? Of course not. It is I that gets
the bill water bill, not anyone else.
I've also read of reports that we have oil reserves for at least 200
years. Depends on which report you want to take and run with to
support your argument.
I take it John that you ride a bike to work? Use solar power to run
your house? If so, you're right to lecture me. If not, well...silenco
A very interesting book has been written on this subject. Get it from
your library. "High and Mighty: SUVs--The World's Most Dangerous
Vehicles and How They Got That Way" by Keith Bradsher (New York Times
Somehow SUVs and big trucks became fashionable image vehicles, which is
almost comical. The roads here in No. California are chock full of
people commuting and shopping in their monster trucks.
You are talking about the NYT reporter. The Times has a dubious record for
accurate reporting lately According to the NHTSA, the death and injury
RATE per 100,000 miles driven in the US is falling. The death and injury
RATE, among children in motor vehicles, has fallen dramatically in the past
ten years. Fallen at an ever greater rate over the past five years. The
reduction is attributed to the fact more children are being properly
retrained and more of them are riding in todays larger safer light trucks
Read the Congressional Record of the recent Senate hearing on CAFE.. One of
the objections to raising the CAFE for light trucks was the fact it could
reverse the downward trend in death and injury rate, particularly among
children, in motor vehicles
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.