Been driving my Accord 2013 EXL for a couple of weeks now, that's with the four-cylinder engine and the CVT transmission. Also comes with a handy instantaneous and trip mileage indicator, first time I've had that (and about time). I haven't even filled the tank up yet, have been driving sparingly the last few weeks. But here are a few observations.
The rated mileage is supposed to be something like 27/36, up from last model's 23/34, or thereabouts. Problem was on the old model I never got more than 30 mpg on a tank, even with over 90% unobstructed freeway driving. And worse, around town (or in stop-and-go) it was a dog, often getting under 22 mpg. So I had high hopes for the new one.
Have they been met? Yes and no.
It was not yet a full tank test, but on a 100 mile freeway round trip the indicated aggregate mileage was over 33. Assuming the indicator is accurate, that's more than 10% better than the previous model. Cruising at 70-80mph, the mileage is better yet.
On the other hand, around town the new model is no better - and may be worse. If you miss a couple of lights, the aggregate drifts below 20 mpg. Ouch.
FWIW, this is without trying the "economy mode" button but otherwise driving with a very light foot, guided by the instantaneous rating. Something the car seems to hate is feathering in acceleration, what seems to work better is giving it a small burst and the coasting, the CVT seems *very* aggressive about dropping the RPM to nothing when it can.
So, it looks to me like the direct-injection and CVT system could use a little more tuning. Hey, do you think standard maintenance will include a software update at some point?
J.