ECU and Timing Question

I've just adjusted the timing on my 95 Civic (SOHC 1.6L PGM-FI). I warmed it up to operating temp, jumped the 2P connector and checked the timing at 750 RPM. Then I made the necessary adjustment.

I've had no problems with setting the timing, but I noticed something. I had supposed that the jumper was there to stop the ECU from "messing" with the timing, but that it was not necessary for *reading* the timing. Of course I checked and adjusted with the jumper on just to be sure, but I found that when the jumper is not connected, timing at 750 RPM is retarded by a several degrees.

Is this normal behavior? Can anyone enlighten me as to why it does that?

Thanks in advance.

Reply to
sharx333
Loading thread data ...

are you sure it retarded, not advanced?

read this:

formatting link

very punny.

Reply to
jim beam

"sharx333" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

It's necessary for BOTH.

Very simply, when you set the timing with the ECU locked out, you were setting the "base timing". "Base timing" is the datum point for the ECU. It's the point from which all other timing adjustments are measured.

Since the timing is affected by distributor position, the ECU has no idea where the timing really is when it does its adjustments. The ECU just has to assume you've set the datum to the right place.

Why did the ECU decide to retard the timing when you un-jumpered the connector? Couldn't tell you. But so long as the engine runs normally, I wouldn't worry about it.

In cars without distributors, the ECU knows exactly where the timing is at all times, so there's no need for the "base timing" adjustment.

Reply to
TeGGeR®

Thanks, TeGGer. Spot-on as always.

Jim: Yes, I think you're right, it's advanced, not retarded. Thanks.

Reply to
sharx333

Sorry about that. I just couldn't resist.

Reply to
sharx333

Jim, I checked again, and at 750 RPM, it's definitely *retarded*.

Reply to
emil.santos

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.