DrivenCt: Which Uses More Energy - Car AC Or Open Windows? You Might Be
By Hoffman Auto Group | Last updated Sep 9, 2011, 8:02 am
Written By Ron Winter
For decades automobile owners have debated whether air conditioning impedes
gas mileage to a degree that it shouldn't be used, or whether the
open-window "flow through" method of cooling is just as bad.
"It's a question we get a lot from people, especially during times of
extreme heat," said Shawn Pinto, service manager for Hoffman Nissan. Pinto
has been with Hoffman for over 10 years, and has experience with American,
Japanese and German vehicles. "Drivers are always looking for ways to boost
gas mileage and save money. Air conditioning use versus windows down is one
of the longest-running debates for automotive experts."
The argument goes that the air conditioner puts more strain on the engine
because of parasitic draw when the air conditioning compressor is engaged,
thus requiring extra gas to keep the vehicle at a constant speed.
Auto air conditioning proponents have long countered, however, that when a
vehicle's windows are open the reverse pressure encountered when the air
stream runs inside the car and up against the rear window also cuts down on
the miles traveled per gallon to a degree that is comparable to using the
Recently a limited test on certain automobiles concluded that due to advance
aerodynamic designs, running the vehicle with the windows open results in a
negative impact that far exceeds the drain on the engine when the air
conditioner is used.
The Society of Automotive Engineers tested both a full-sized sedan and a
sport utility vehicle on an open track and in a wind tunnel, and as reported
by HowStuffWorks.com, concluded "driving with the windows up and the air
conditioning on is typically a more fuel-efficient way to drive."
SAE reported that "in the wind tunnel, air was forced over the front of the
car and also from an angle on the front of the car to simulate a cross wind.
In the desert, temperatures and vehicle speed were factored into the study.
Overall, both studies showed that driving with the windows down has a
significant negative effect on the fuel efficiency - more than using the
vehicle's air conditioner."
For the sedan, when the windows were down, the efficiency was reduced by 20
percent, while the SUV fuel efficiency was reduced just 8 percent. The study
concluded that the more aerodynamic the vehicle, the more drag open windows
Since only two cars were studied under fairly limited driving conditions the
results can hardly be considered absolutely conclusive. Nonetheless, the
study does show that there is a significant disparity in fuel usage between
a sedan and a SUV when comparing air conditioning and open windows - but in
favor of using the air.
"Air conditioning versus windows down is a hard question to answer because
there are so many variables that need to be accounted for," said Pinto. He
explained that speed, weather conditions and the type of vehicle are all
factors that contribute to the fuel efficiency of either AC or natural air.
"The short answer to the debate is that maximum fuel efficiency, while
staying cool, depends on the situation."
There are myriad arguments against using air conditioning, with some drivers
preferring to purchase much smaller cars and hybrids - for their improved
aerodynamics over SUVs and trucks - but often the issue goes much further.
According to the SAE study, driving at speeds in excess of 55 mph with the
windows down result in a dramatic decrease in fuel efficiency - as much as
20 percent, versus around 10 percent with air conditioning. For this reason,
many people refuse to drive over the old 55 mile per hour speed limit, even
if they are in areas with 65, 70 or 75 mph speed limits. There are also some
who drive only a night, or in the early morning and early evening hours to
take advantage of cooler temperatures.
But aside from the speed issue, it is likely to be difficult for most people
to alter their driving habits to such an extreme, in the interest of a
potential savings of a few gallons of gasoline. And while driving a smaller
vehicle or a hybrid certainly is a commendable effort, there is no way that
approach will work for families with children.
Driving a long distance with an infant or toddler along for the ride can be
difficult enough without also applying the extra burden of extreme
discomfort. And there are reasons why some drivers prefer trucks, SUVs and
full-sized sedans, including all the gear that growing families need when
they take part in school sporting activities, summer vacations including
camping, or carrying tools to the job site.
But if achieving maximum fuel efficiency - while staying comfortable - is
situational, in what a setting do you choose to blast the AC?
"Highway driving is the most fuel-efficient use of air conditioning," said
Pinto. "When you're driving around town, and having the windows down keeps
you sufficiently cool, then don't use the AC."
Editor's note: Ron Winter is a CtWatchdog blogger, as well as a book author,
and a publicist. Hoffman pays Ron a fee for each of his DrivenCt articles,
but CtWatchdog Editor & Publisher edit them and only post those that meet
our normal high standards of giving the best possible advice to consumers.
DrivenCt.com is a consumer auto guide which George helped create, provides
editorial guidance and advertising in return for a marketing fee. The
columns that published from DrivenCt.com are not only edited by George, they
are sometimes, suggested by him. In full disclosure, George's son Ethan
Gombossy is the Porsche service representative for Hoffman. And of course
from time to time Hoffman dealerships pay for advertising on CtWatchdog.com.
George also purchased his company vehicle at Hoffman prior to entering into
the marketing agreement. Obviously George has a huge conflict of interest
and therefor cannot publish any positive or negative comments from readers
about Hoffman Auto Group. As he has in the past, he forwards any complaints
he recieves to co-owner Brad Hoffman.