Re: domino

You are still not getting it DUDE!. If we stop burning gasoline, it will all be "excess" gasoline, that will need to be burned off at the refineries. Much the same way we currently burn off all the"excess" natural gas that can not be used because the NG lines are filled to capacity and the environuts are appose to building more NG lines LOL

> >> Whet he suggest was they make more diesel. If the refineries can not >> get rid of the lighter distillates like gasoline, they will need to burn >> it off like they did before it began to be used as a motor fuel ;) > > you're still not getting it dude. catalysis, not simple distillation. > that means no "excess" gasoline. > > > > > >> >>> >>> >>>> What would we do with the gasoline? >>> >>> jeepers mike, "catalysis" - look it up. simple distillation, what >>> you're assuming, is yesterdays news. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> Having been a trained nuclear engineer in the Navy 35 years ago, I >>>>> can only imagine how much better and safer the nuclear plants would >>>>> be today. In the Navy, we have never had a nuclear accident in over >>>>> 40 years of operation of MANY plants. The best people to build the >>>>> plants would be the Navy, keeping the unions out of the equation. I >>>>> witnessed first hand how the escalated the cost of building the >>>>> reactors in Limerick, Pa. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, the French would also be a good choice since they actually have >>>>> MORE nuclear plants than they can use. They had to shut some down as >>>>> they became more Green and used less energy. >>>>> >>>>> Finally, the mix of gas and diesel from a barrel of oil is >>>>> interesting; however, the percentages could be shifted to more diesel >>>>> than gas as we switched to diesel cars. The problem is that the oil >>>>> companies wouldn't make as much money. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>an already full demand side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Dropping the taxes on biodiesel for highly efficienty diesel >>>>>>>automobiles might >>>>>>>help. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>As I see it, there is no real energy plan for this nation, just a >>>>>>>bunch of >>>>>>>unhappy >>>>>>>people. If Obama could put together an intelligent energy policy, >>>>>>>maybe he >>>>>>>would >>>>>>>earn his salary. >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem is the luddite rejection of nuke power. Which is the >>>>>> safest, cleanest way to generate power. A real energy plan would be >>>>>> to start building nukes, and standardize auto batteries for swap-out >>>>>> at service stations. Meaning a joint effort by auto mfgs, power >>>>>> companies and service station operators. >>>>>> It would be a real Manhattan type project. Provide a lot of jobs. >>>>>> We contract French engineers to do the nuke plants. They know what >>>>>> they're doing. >>>>>> >>>>>> --Vic >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >
Reply to
Mike Hunter
Loading thread data ...

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.