another junker bill that needs shot down

The following came from our friends at Summit. I've copied the message below.

Long story short the first bill "cash for clunkers" was shot down in flames and will not be a part of the economic stimulus package.

But that won't stop the nutbags from introuducing it again. And they did.

"Accelerated Retirement of Inefficient Vehicles Act"

Sorry, but some of those older vehicles actually get better milage. Too bad we can't do a nutter mod to Pelosi. ;)

----------------------------------

Dear Fellow Enthusiast,

Last month, we sent you an Urgent Legislative Alert from The Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) regarding a proposed "Cash for Clunkers" bill that would threaten our hobby. Thanks to your overwhelming response, this legislation was dropped from the economic stimulus package. Congratulations for standing up for your rights as enthusiasts!

We have just received a follow-up Legislative Alert from SEMA. New legislation (S. 247 and H.R. 520) has been introduced in Congress to create a national vehicle scrappage program which will give U.S. tax dollars to consumers who turn-in their "gas guzzlers" to have them crushed. This program would target vehicles with low fuel economy ratings of any model year. That means sports cars, SUVs, and performance-built vehicles could be crushed in exchange for a monetary reward.

The following information is directly from SEMA. If you would like to contact the lawmaker, follow the instructions in the alert.

Thank you for your time,

Your Friends at Summit Racing Equipment

Our effort to prevent Congress from including a nationwide "Cash for Clunkers" program in the economic stimulus package has been successful

- so far. Thousands of SEMA members and SEMA Action Network (SAN) enthusiasts contacted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in opposition to the plan. The Speaker's Office informed us that your emails, calls and faxes were received and, thanks to your work, Cash for Clunkers was not included in the economic stimulus package introduced in mid-January in the House of Representatives. Unfortunately, new legislation (S. 247 and H.R. 520) has been introduced in Congress to create a national vehicle scrappage program which will give U.S. tax dollars to consumers who turn-in their "gas guzzlers" to have them crushed. Lawmakers need to scrap this idea!

Contact Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) Immediately to Oppose S. 247 and H.R. 520

The so-called "Accelerated Retirement of Inefficient Vehicles Act" is Cash for Clunkers with a twist. Instead of focusing exclusively on older cars, this program would target vehicles with low fuel economy ratings of any model year. Participants would receive cash vouchers ranging from $2,500 to $4,500 based on the model year and whether the replacement vehicle was a more fuel-efficient new car or used car (MY 2004 or later). Fuel-efficient is defined as getting at least 25 percent better mileage for the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) target for its class. The bill sponsors want to scrap up to one million cars a year for at least four years.

There is no evidence that the program would achieve the goal of boosting new car sales or increasing fuel mileage. Many states have considered scrappage programs in the past as a way to help clean the air or increase mpg, but abandoned the effort because they simply don't work. The programs are not cost-effective and do not achieve verifiable air quality or fuel economy benefits, but they do have a devastating impact on the many small businesses that market products and services for the scrapped cars.

Don't Delay! Please contact Senator Diane Feinstein and Rep. Henry Waxman today to urge their opposition to S. 247 and H.R. 520. For those who responded to our first call for action, we need you again, along with everyone else.

Contact Sen. Dianne Feinstein to oppose S. 247 Click here to send an email:

formatting link
(202) 224-3841Fax: (202) 228-3954

Contact Henry Waxman to oppose HR 520 Click here to send an email:

formatting link
(202) 225-2927Fax: (202) 225-2525

Talking Points Oppose the Use of U.S. Taxpayer Dollars for Accelerated Vehicle Retirement

- I am writing to urge lawmakers not to approve an "accelerated vehicle retirement" program. Even on a voluntary basis, the program will hurt thousands of independent repair shops, auto restorers, customizers and their customers across the country that depend on the used car market. These businesses are already very vulnerable in the weak economy.

- An accelerated vehicle retirement program is flawed since it does not target the "gross polluter," an improperly maintained vehicle of any make or model year that has poor fuel mileage and dramatically more emissions due to poor maintenance.

- An accelerated vehicle retirement program is flawed because it does not factor-in how many miles-a-year the collected vehicles are currently being driven. U.S. taxpayers will be buying rarely-driven second and third vehicles that have minimal impact on overall fuel economy and air pollution.

- Accelerated vehicle retirement won't generate many new car sales. The cash incentive provided will not be enough to enable a person to buy a new or used vehicle.

- Accelerated vehicle retirement will compete with nonprofits that rely on vehicle donations to raise funds, such as the Salvation Army, the Purple Heart and other charities.

- Accelerated vehicle retirement threatens to disrupt a large and complex industry which already handles scrappage, repair, remanufacturing and recycling issues. This independent industry provides thousands of American jobs and generates millions of dollars in local, state and federal tax revenues.

- Accelerated vehicle retirement ignores better policy options. Taxpayer dollars would be better spent as direct tax incentives to purchase a fuel-efficient new or used car, without a government vehicle crushing program. Congress should also provide tax incentives to upgrade, repair and maintain existing cars, trucks and SUVs. There are many commercially available products and technologies that can substantially improve fuel mileage and lower the emissions.

- We hope we can count on you to reject "Accelerated Vehicle Retirement." Thank you for your consideration on this very important matter.

If you choose to send a note and/or message to Sen. Feinstein and Rep. Waxman please forward a copy of your message to: E-mail: briand AT sema.org

Reply to
DougW
Loading thread data ...

What an excellent idea. I'll write my congresscritters right away and ask them to support this!

Nah, I know how. Just say I agree with that bill and it should pass.

Reply to
Gary L. Burnore

This was my cut.

------------------------

CC: Dianne Feinstein, Henry Waxman

I am writing to urge opposition on the ?accelerated vehicle retirement? program S. 247 and HR 520.

These programs will hurt thousands of independent repair shops, auto restorers, aftermarket producers, customizers and their customers across the country that depend on the used car market. Businesses that are already very vulnerable in this weak economy.

Accelerated vehicle retirement programs are flawed since they do not target ?gross polluters,? improperly maintained vehicle of any make, model, or year will have poor fuel mileage and dramatically more emissions. While properly maintained and upgraded older vehicles have even been able to pass the current California emission standards.

Accelerated vehicle retirement programs do not factor-in how many miles-a-year the collected vehicles are being driven. U.S. taxpayers will be buying rarely-driven second, third, and even long abandoned or imported junk vehicles that have minimal impact on overall fuel economy and air pollution.

Accelerated vehicle retirement won?t generate many new car sales. The cash incentive provided will not be enough to enable a person to buy a new or if they have not been crushed yet, used vehicle.

Accelerated vehicle retirement will compete with nonprofits that rely on vehicle donations to raise funds, such as the Salvation Army, the Purple Heart, Disabled American Veterans, and other charities.

Accelerated vehicle retirement threatens to disrupt a large and complex industry which already handles scrappage, repair, remanufacturing and recycling issues. This independent industry provides tens of thousands of American jobs and generates millions of dollars in local, state and federal tax revenues.

Accelerated vehicle retirement ignores better policy options. Taxpayer dollars would be better spent as direct tax incentives to purchase a fuel-efficient new or used car.

In closing, please reject ?Accelerated Vehicle Retirement.? Thank you for your consideration on this very important matter.

Vr,

Reply to
DougW

S. 247 and HR 520.

The neat thing is you can call their offices and somoene will check off the for or against. (your's gets in the against, my 3 calls to each goes in the for> Dianne and Henry don't READ them, silly.

I'll make a few more calls tomorrow from anther exchange. That always helps.

Reply to
Joeseph P. Blow

go away troll and stop hijacking jeep threads

your not welcome in this group

Joeseph P. Blow wrote:

program S. 247 and HR 520.

Reply to
Jeep America #1

Never thought it wasn't

Will

Reply to
Williams Nemesis

You're not welcome anywhere Jerky/Billy Won't be long before they come to get your Thunderturkey for littering the neigborhood Billyboi.

Will

Reply to
Williams Nemesis

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.