Bwaaahhhhh!! SUCKERS FOR PUNISHMENT!

In the past, Land Rover has shown reliability and build quality problems, and this is reflected in its showing in various industry and consumer quality and dependability related surveys, as detailed below:

Land Rover marque ranked last on the US J.D. Power and Associates Vehicle Dependability Survey for 2005 (published 8 July 2005) (Kia second last). This is the fourth year that it has been in the last or second to last place in the survey. This study was based on responses from more than 55,000 US based original owners of 2000 model year cars and light trucks at three years of ownership. [1] In 2004, it narrowly dethroned Kia, as the least reliable nameplate, but swapped places in

2005. (Kia last, Land Rover 2nd last). Tied for last (with Hummer and Porsche) in the 2006 Consumer Reports (US) car reliability survey. It was only one of 6 makes that did not have a model whose reliability was "Good" or above (joined by Mercedes- Benz, Volkswagen and Jaguar); its highest-rating car was the LR3, which got a rating of "Poor". In addition, 56 percent of people who owned a 2003 Range Rover reported problems, as did 61 percent of 2002 Freelander owners--both the highest among all cars for that model year. Ranked second-to-last in the 2007 Consumer Reports (US) car reliability survey. (Mercedes-Benz took the bottom place.) In the same survey, the LR3/Discovery with a V8 engine was ranked the second least reliable SUV in the midsized category. (The 2006 model year M-class of Mercedes-Benz took the last place in that category.) It also was ranked as one of the 3 least reliable over the last 10 years in 2007.[20] Land Rover Discovery 6th-from-the-bottom of 100 models for reliability in an Auto Express 2002 survey in the UK. Joint 16th-from-the-bottom in 144 car 2002 J.D. Power's What Car? (UK) magazine customer satisfaction survey. Land Rover had joint highest average cost in warranty claims for cars up to 10 years old in 2002 UK Warranty Direct index =96 (based on full- maintenance leasing claims). Land Rover Discovery was joint second-to-last in 2002 Which? (UK) magazine reliability survey of cars up to 2 years old =96 however, only 35 Land Rovers were in the sample. Land Rover was 3rd least-reliable of 31 makes of car in 2002 Which? (UK) magazine reliability survey of 2000-2002 model-year cars. Least-reliable of 32 makes built 1997-1999. Spate of engine power, gearbox and exploding clutch problems (which Land Rover reportedly has refused to repair under warranty).
Reply to
PaulpULVITZKA
Loading thread data ...

Hello Troll!

Wow, thanks for the insight, we'll all be off to ebay next stop due to your shared wisdom.

NOT!

Reply to
Lee_D

What do you recommend then?

Reply to
tad

.. done everything asked of it. I see it easily lasting another 12 years (it's about 12 years old now) ... so what do you recommend or drive that you could also be as certain about?

Reply to
Paul - xxx mobile

H
Reply to
Nige

In message , PaulpULVITZKA writes

So?

Reply to
hugh

"PaulpULVITZKA" spewed a load of crap in message

In the past, Land Rover has shown reliability and build quality problems

Who gives a shit?

Oily

Reply to
Oily

Well, this worm ridden rectal fissure does.

Reply to
Nige

Do you?

Reply to
hugh

hehe - I saw that just after i hit send ;)

Reply to
Nige

Seems the majority of satisfied Land Rover owners are less likely to participate in surveys than all the other whinging wankers :-{

Reply to
Stuart

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.