OT - ISP's

Evening

Tiscali are doing my nut in. Their servers are up and down all the time, rendering internet / mail useless.

Ive seen a company called 'Be' and they are offering up to 24mb for £14.

formatting link
I pay tiscali £17 at the min for a shit service.

Has anyone used these?

I can only imagine the hassle it is going to be to a) close my tiscali account, and b) get my migration code from them....

Joy.

Reply to
Mark Solesbury
Loading thread data ...

.www.bethere.co.uk/I pay tiscali =A317 at the min for a shit service.

I know it's terribly un-cool, but BT havn't put a foot wrong for work, and AOL is just fine for home (you don't have to have all the AOL front end rubbish for broad-band).

Richard (very un-cool, but always connected!)

Reply to
BeamEnds

I'll second that - in two and a half years my BT broadband was not down for one minute, and we used the connection *all* the time. Maybe a bit more expensive, but well worth it in my mind to avoid all the frustration of being off-line on a regular basis.

Matt

Reply to
Matthew Maddock

Mark> Evening Tiscali are doing my nut in. Their servers are up Mark> and down all the time, rendering internet / mail useless.

I've been on Demon broadband since about 2000. It's been next to flawless during that time - I think I might have had to reboot the router a few times, and a couple of mail outages for an hour or two. Not bad for 7 years.

Reply to
AndyC the WB

For purely domestic use Nildram have also not put a foot wrong in the, gosh is it really, 4 years that I've been with them. I pay ~£15/month for up 8Mb/s - which actually hovers around 6Mb/s - and up to 2Gb download/month.

Look at

formatting link
HTH

Richard

Reply to
Richard

P.S. My father has decide to sign up with that well-known IT provider Waitrose on the basis of a Which? report that chose them as best buy. Why??? I guess that I'll find out when I have to dig him out of the mire!

Richard

Reply to
Richard

£14.www.bethere.co.uk/I pay tiscali £17 at the min for a shit service.

You tend to get what you pay for. BT for 5 years, gone wrong twice, for a few hours each time.

Reply to
Danny

Golly - a BT love-in. Have to agree. Been with BT since broadband came to this here neck of the woods (and on 56k before that). Not problem free (setup was a bit of a game) but they listen to what you have to say and fix things quickly. No complaints at all.

Reply to
Rich B

I've been with BT in the past and wouldn't touch them with a barge pole, due to their amazing inability to fix their own network or for their staff to understand simple questions or to behave professionally. Perhaps there's two BTs ;-)

Reply to
Ian Rawlings

Much as it pains me to be nice about BT, I signed up with them using Risc-OS, and the tech bloke quite happily admitted that he'd never heard of it, and would I be happy if he just gave me the necessary IP adresses - exactly what I wanted. Having been on NTL before, where their bloke insisted on telling me to insert the (Windows) CD....... Mind you, now they are called Virgin.net I suppose everything is perfect.... ahem.

Richard

Reply to
BeamEnds

24 milli bit what is that?

I think you mean 24 Mbps which will drop to about 8 Mbps with a local lo= op length of about a mile. After that it'll perform more or less the same a= s an "8 Mbps" service...

Regarding BT the physical provision that is still BT no matter who you b= uy your broadband from. Unless you go for one of the Local Loop Unbundling =

deals from the likes of Carphone Warehouse. Even then I expect you'll still find a BT man fixing any physical line faults rather than a bloke =

from your unbundled supplier.

Apart from the local loop lenght the common gotcha's are any down/up loa= d caps and contention ratio, things that marketing puff tend to gloss over= or ignore.

Reply to
Dave Liquorice

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.