Sandy Nuts ( snipped-for-privacy@home.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
Octavia = Golf = A3.
Sandy Nuts ( snipped-for-privacy@home.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
Octavia = Golf = A3.
I know, I'm joking to add some spice to an already confused sub-thread.
The message from snipped-for-privacy@italiancar.co.uk (SteveH) contains these words:
My eight year old's friends do that. It's about the most annoying thing they do.
In news:Qy7af.73$ snipped-for-privacy@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net, AstraVanMan decided to enlighten our sheltered souls with a rant as follows
The equivalent of 50 mpg on LPG, ITYF.
Yes, they do look s**te. But they're a very well selling car, so it's inevitable that a fair few will get crashed. I bet you haven't seen many VW Phaetons in there. A lot less of those were sold than the Focus. I wonder if that's a coincidence?
'cooking' Imprezas and Lancers are tediously dull cars.
AstraVanMan ( snipped-for-privacy@Whataloadofforeskinbollocks.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
The *new* Focus? I've hardly seen any about yet.
In fact, that's a point. I may have been talking s**te.
You probably have, it's just that they're so bland you haven't noticed.
SteveH ( snipped-for-privacy@italiancar.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
Ah. Of course.
They're still nice to drive, that's what matters to me. Good handling, zesty engine.
You have strange standards.
Nice to drive? ROFL go get in a car that really is nice to drive like an Elise.
Yeah, very practical, an Elise. I wouldn't get an Elise anyway if I wanted an out and out sports car I'd go for the Exige or a Porsche Cayman, way out of my price band though and not practical for me. Christ what a mindless suggestion.
You never said anything about practical just a very wrong statement about Imprezas and Lancers being good to drive. I know where to file the rest of your posts.
I can think of a number of reasons. What gets classed as engine reliability is rarely anything to do with the engine itself these days. It's mainly failing ancilliaries - fuel injection systems, electrical systems etc. Are these always going to be identical components from the same source? How these get assembled, wires being stretched, connections not fully made, maybe whether a squirt of anti corrosion fluid gets used on connections or not could make a difference. Then there's the start up procedure and whether someone canes the thing round the carpark at 6k rpm on the way out of the factory.
Finally there's post production quality control and maybe a conscientious Czech listening for unusual engine noises or an engine that doesn't settle down to the expected idle speed after starting which could indicate a potential long term problem will pull out more cars for QC work than someone in another factory who doesn't give a shit as long as it starts and drives onto a truck.
-- Dave Baker
Always surprises me when I see recent model cars with parking sensors, and a big dent in the bumper!
To quote my local hire car agent " Bugger they've given me one with parking sensors" .", "No, they don't stop people reversing into things , they just make it more expensive when they do."
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.