Reduce fuel consumption avg. 13%, greenhouse emissions 50-80% and increase power

Alternatively, visit

for more detail than you'd ever need about this and many similar duff products...

The message from "Dennis Wijers" contains these words:

Ah, it's the lighter wallet that improves the economy.

There is no such thing as a magnetic charge.

Nick MEng(Hons) Electrical & Electronic Engineering

I leave my kids at home the little chubby brats weigh a ton

since doing so my mpg is looking brighter, can't leave my wife at home though she'd divorce me.

The message from "Nick Dobb" contains these words:

How long before one appears with monopoles in it?

Nah, the little plastic houses and hotels would block up the fuel filter...

Oh, monoPOLES.

Sorry.

:-)

Be3st way is to drive economically all the time and shop around for cheapest fuel. In my area , a lite of Shell is 98.9 at one garage and 3 miles down the road 92.9.

I fill half a tank , when i get down to red , put another half tank in.

Local paper alos had offer of 3p off a litre at Total a few weeks back .

Lying tosser. You and your ilk ought to be strung up by the neck and left hanging from the nearest oak tree.

Yes there is - 150 euros for a standard petrol system, and 190 euros for a standard diesel system.

The message from "Dave Baker" contains these words:

I'm never sure whether these people are deluded or cynical. Given there are plenty of people out there who believe in this crap I suppose it's possible that some of the sellers do too. I suppose there's a good deal of bias involved, whether wittingly or not.

Suggests some of the many ways in which it can happen, but this one fits best.

In message , Guy King writes

Unfortunately, this doesn't work:

Dear Nick, Thanks for picking me up on my semantics. I know there is no such thing as a magnetic charge, but can you think of a better way of phrasing it in lay-man's terms. I mean, I could write how the molecules pass through an magnetic field and the electromagnetic radiation affects it, but if most people wouldn't really want something that emits 'radiation' to be installed into their cars.

Dennis Wijers BA (Hons) International Hospitality Management, BA (Hons) Jazz Performance

With qualifications like that, how can he be lying? Makes you wonder why manufacturers don't fit these devices in the first place?

Z

Here we were thinking that people don't want them installed into there cars because they don't work.

Thanks for the info. Consider yourself added to my scam list...

Tony

In message , Dennis Wijers writes

How does it differ from this:

> Bogus Fuel-Saving Device Sellers Settle FTC Charges

Or from the ones tested here:

>Devices Tested by EPA

(Note; no asterisks, these were proven not to work)

The message from Steve Walker contains these words:

You sod, I even clicked on that!

The message from "Henk Wijers" contains these words:

You don't get electromagnetic radiation from magnets.

Really, if you're going to try to flog this crap you really could try to come up with some vaguely credible balls to support it. Just throwing around a few words in the hope that the buyer won't understand them isn't really trying hard enough.

They aren't in the US. We are not so good at shooting down frauds and charlatans over here. Yet.