Back when I was in college I had an 87 Chevy Sprint Turbo, a rebadged Suzuki. I believe it weighed 1800 lbs or so and had an intercooled fuel injected 3-cylinder turbocharged engine producing all of 70 hp. It was a crude little car but it was cheap to run, a blast to drive and surprisingly fast.
CRX was great basic transportation for a single guy or maybe a young couple. Very nimble, considering it was not really meant to be a sports car. And kind of cute, like the first series Civic (jellybean!).
Would still be a good basic commuter today, except if they have not rusted to bits they have been molested by ricers. Just try to find a clean example! sigh
I had a 1968 Mustang. I thought it was reliable...but then the only cars I'd owned previously had been a Jaguar and an MG.
In 80k miles, that 6-cylinder Mustang only went through one clutch and two sets of spider gears. Oh, and it had begun using oil. Considering it was my autocross car and not very close to stock, that probably wasn't too shabby for the late '60s.
The '71 240Z that replaced the Mustang was certainly fun, but it wasn't any more reliable. A U-joint failed every couple of months like clockwork (there were six of them), by 50k the driveline lash was really annoying, it was using oil by 70k, plus it was the poster child for fender rust.
Other highlights for my well-maintained cars: Toyota Hilux, blew head gasket. Honda Accord, wiring harness shorted and fried from road salt. Other Accord, blew head gasket. Mazda GLC, broken spring, rod knock (at
178K miles); departed with its original clutch though.
So far, the Miata is all original at 145k except for some upgrades, and the 3 has been trouble-free.
Ah well, I know these anecdotal references do no good, even though in my recollection of the 70's and 80's it was anecdotal references from consumer to consumer that pushed Honda and Toyota to their positions of preeminence in the U.S. auto market in the first place.
Tim, This Chris is with you on this subject. I had a great Omni 024 back in the day, and I loved the 1987 Ford Taurus that I bought in it's 1st year of production. Had a decent result with a Dodge Intrepid but even better results with several Accords. The bigger deal to me is the imports better seats and switch gear. American companies have traditionally been penny wise and pound foolish imho.
As for trucks, I've never been less than amazed with the quality of domestic mfr's trucks, even though very few are still built in the US! Does anybody beside Dodge build full size trucks in the US? Does Toyota?
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.