6,000 DaimlerChrysler Jobs at Risk
07.12.2004, 01:01 PM
DaimlerChrysler will move production of future versions of its
Mercedes-Benz C-Class cars away from the company's biggest German plant
- costing 6,000 jobs - unless it gets about about $620 million a year in
cost savings, company executives said Monday.
Personnel chief Guenther Flieg said workers at Sindelfingen outside the
company's Stuttgart base must bring labor costs in line with those at
factories in the north German city of Bremen and in East London, South
Otherwise, new C-Class model production will be moved to those
facilities "and the alternative would be we will have to part with 6,000
workers," most of them at Sindelfingen, Flieg told reporters. Some
41,000 people work at Sindelfingen now.
Mercedes-Benz chief Juergen Hubbert said that "the Sindelfingen factory
is not the most productive plant, by a long ways."
The company is pressing its German workers to cut paid breaks and extra
pay for late shifts and weekends before it will guarantee the company
will invest in further production, which is not expected to begin until
2007. Workers have offered to forego a contractual rate of 2.8 percent
slated for 2006, which would save 180 million euros ($223 million), but
have balked at deeper cuts.
Similar trade-offs of cost concessions in return for guaranteed work are
common in the German auto industry and are usually negotiated without
great fanfare. This set of negotiations has been more rancorous and
worker representatives have called for a nationwide day of protest by
DaimlerChrysler workers on Thursday.
Workers at the company's Untertuerkheim in Stuttgart briefly stopped
work on Friday to attend an information meeting as part of the protest
Production of new versions of the C-Class won't begin until 2007 but the
investment decisions are being made now.
Hubbert said workers in Bremen in northern Germany had fewer holidays
and less burdensome rules on paid break time than their counterparts at
"The cost disadvantages are serious," he said.
Production at Bremen could be pushed up to 1,200 a day from 700-750,
said Hubbert. As many as 300 a day could be produced in East London,
which makes versions for countries where the steering wheel is on the
right side of the car.
One can argue at length if cost cuts have to
take place at the Sindelfingen plant or not -
what definitely makes the workers crazy is
that the pay for board of management went
through the roof since the aquisation of
I am sure a hot debate will evolve in the
Why does this bother the workers? The board of management
salary increases most likely have a negligible effect
The .62 Billion in savings that the company wants from the
plant will add about 10% to net profits ( I think ).
That comes out to about 15,000 USD per worker at the
plant in annual savings. The company must want significant
Now that the workers have gone on strike
I wonder what will happen.
If the workers want the company to be run for
their benefit they might want to consider
setting up an agressive stock purchase plan
because the managers work for the stockholders.
But it is this _we save costs at the expense of
the workers only but not at the expense of the
board of management_;
although the board easily could stand a - say -
20 per cent reduction in payment they always want
more and more while at the same time reducing the
workers salaries: Preaching water but drinking wine
(as we say here in Germany).
It does not matter if 10, 8 or 12 per cent.
The union offered more work worth 200 million Euro,
DC wants 500 million Euro.
The Sindelfingen plant is the plant with the highest
profit within the company.
The weekly worktime is a nominal 35 hours, but effective
worktime in Sindelfingen is 30,3 hours per worker on the
line, in Bremen it is 31,7 (?) hours, that is 72 hours
more per year, DC says production cost of a C-Class in
Bremen is 500 Euro less than in Sindelfingen.
Yes, they _say_ they want.
What they really want is some extreme concessions
from the workers and so they put the worst-case
scenario on the table.
The point is that Mercedes is the cash-cow of the
DaimlerChrysler group feeding high losses of
Mitsubishi over Smart and Maybach to Chrysler - they
have to be _extremely_ carefully they do not run-down
the Mercedes brand even more than they have done in
the past as brand loyalty is not as strong as it once
was and one day customers could not buy enough Mercedes
anymore to feed the losses of the other brands.
And another point is that the DaimlerChrysler board
of management is not worth its payment, there are too
many over-ambitious amateurs part of it - long-time
workers do have a good feeling for the quality resp.
non-quality of the board of management:
The current board only wants to make personal money
and is not interested in the long-term success of
the Mercedes brand, their attitude is _people will
always buy MBs_: That of course is basically right,
but the question is if in the long run it is still
And to get some light on the losses:
Maybach total sale in Germany since production began
is 57 cars, world-wide ca. 600.
Break-even would be around 13.500 cars in the first
10 years - absolutely no way, so Maybach will _always_
loose money, MUCH money.
Smart still has to earn the up-to-today loss of ca.
2000 million Euros - still a long way, optimistic
view is to reach break-even around 2007.
IMHO it'll be 2010 or later...
Crossblade is a total flop, new unused Crossblades
not even sell for half-list price, fortwo getting old,
action needed not too far in the future, Roadster and
Roadster-Coupe selling slow, forfour _has_ to become
a strong seller otherwise break-even will take even
longer than scheduled.
Mitsubishi - emergency brake pulled by DC.
In the last year Mitsubishi lost 740 million Euro.
That was due to faulty credits given to Mitsubishi
customers - sales declined when these _everyone
who wants a credit gets a credit_-philosophy was
ended: Mitsubishi cars only sell over the price,
not over the cars themselves, that is because the
brand has no real profile - that is long-known,
but the DC board of management has not even realized
this until today...
Mercedes - flops are Vaneo, CLS will be a flop in
terms of sales figures, Unimogs too expensive so
sales are low, C-Class Sportscoupe sales are low,
C-Class not selling well, too, the face-lift will
have no significant long-term effect in boosting
sales I fear...
SLR is as superfluous as a car can be - sales low,
Fuso - DC has a 65 per cent stake.
The commercial vehicle brand has severe problems
as in March 112.000 trucks had a recall and now
there is a new recall of 182.000 trucks...
Chrysler - Rebate war in the US going on affecting
Chrysler profits severely.
Also until now nearly no synergy effects of the merger
of Daimler-Benz and Chrysler - if I remember correctly
yearly synergy effects of at least 1000 million Euro
were boasted by the board of management at the time of
Main problem of the DC group is head of the supervisory
board, Hilmar Kopper, who still supports I-am-a-loudmouth-
has-to-be-run Juergen Schrempp ==:-(((
Schrempp already ruined Dutch aircraft maker Fokker...
Ok, enough of that - but these very obvious problems
of the DaimlerChrysler group are also seen by many
Mercedes workers who do a good job and so it is no
wonder they do not perceive their payment shall be
reduced but not the payment of the board.
P.S.: Free lesson for the DC management:
The core value of the Mercedes brand is quality,
quality - and quality.
Once the reputation for quality is totally gone
the brand is, too.
Well, that put it into perspective.
What about the new Chrysler 300C? I think they
are using a Mercedes transmission in it and it has
340 horsepower. This may be a case where there
was some synergistic success.
It appears to be doing very well and it has the appearance
of a love child produced by a drunken Mercedes
male car and a hot Chrysler momma.
Its getting lots of love.
I would even consider one except that I want
a convertible and the dash has a bit too
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.