E-Class: 2004 E320 to become E350 for US?

Is it true that the E320 will be replaced by E350 soon for the US market? Any idea when it will hit the showroom?
http://www.imakenews.com/autospies/e_article000091020.cfm

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Any
Quite possibly.
The problem is that the E320 CDI (diesel), is faster, cheaper and more economical than the petrol E320. Which means in Europe sales of the E320 are pretty poor.
This is what killed off the S320 and it was replaced with the S350 in order to offer a product superior to the S320 CDI.
Merc diesels are getting too good for their own good. And it is amusing their refusal to export the V8 diesels.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:38:05 +0000 (UTC), "Oliver Keating"

Its a damn shame, drove a left hand drive S400 CDI, it was sweet.
--

Lettuce spray for whirled peas...

Reply to usenet[at]miknik[dot]co[dot]uk
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

Yes, but if you really want a diesel V8, there is one in the Audi A8, although it isn't quite flashy enough for British tastes, the A8 does better in Germany where people are less keen to flash their cash.
Also there is the diesel V10 in the new VW Phaeton.
So Merc had better start offering its V8 diesel to us soon!
Apparently there are AMG variants of diesels too now!

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Going on technical merits & ignoring the effects of any tax disincentives on diesel cars, i'll certainly prefer the diesel version of the E 320 or S 320 to the inferior petrol version !
I don't seem too impressed with the so-called S 350 petrol model as it's a 3.7 litre & performance expectations etc. to be seen in the context of a 3.7 litre engine. Also, in all consistency they ought to label it as S 370 instead to reduce confusion !
Anycase, i'll still prefer the (diesel of course !) S 400 over the 'S 350' or more appropriately what which should be known as S 370, unless they reduce the engine size to 3.5 litres in order for the S 350 label to have its real meaning !!!
With few exceptions, their diesel models are nowadays the better models over their petrol models ! Especially in fuel efficientcy, economy, torque performance & possibly even (non-idling i.e. crusing or accelerating) noise levels in that it's quieter !! Exhaust particulate emissions are relatively insignificant minor 'irritants' with the latest diesel cDi charge-cooled technologies. Therfore overall, the prefered choice remains diesel over petrol or electric or fuel-cell etc. least for the time being.
Oliver Keating wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
House of Chin wrote:

Are not those particulate emissions unusually toxic?
.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
greek_philosophizer wrote:

Correction : I meant significantly toxic.
.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

charge-cooled
Yes. They are a problem. The issue has split the world.
Japan is very anti-diesel, all diesels in cities must be scrapped after 7 years !!
Europe is very pro-diesel, looking at the fuel economy and CO2 benefits, while other emmisions are rapidly being brought under control.
Meanwhile the USA just doesn't care :)
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Aside from fuel costs there's a good reason for US consumers shunning diesels. The USA had a flirt with diesels 25 years ago, which began with VWs introduction of the Rabbit (Golf 1) diesel in 1977, a conversion of their standard gasoline inline 4 cylinder. Money-see-monkey-do GM followed shortly thereafter with their own range of hastily converted, poorly engineered gasoline V8s.
Aside from poor performance, these proved to be hopelessly unreliable, to the point where GM was replacing engines at a rate of nearly 50% of production at one point (Rumor from GM service types was that the other 50% just went off into the woods & died!) GM faced massive consumer litigation and thus would pop for free replacement engines on theses vehicles at ridiculously high mileage. Hundreds of thousands of consumers bought these bogus products in good faith and not only never bought another diesel, many dumped GM forever, leaving the door wide open for the Japanese to conquest market share.
As for VWs cool little diesel, while the initial (77-79) run of these cars was in hot demand, by 1980 fuel supply fears eased in the US and VW diesel sales cooled. VW then had big problems with internal block casting cracks on the 80 and later models which filled the cooling systems with oil. Other problems arose with the fuel system, premature ring failure due to high sulphur fuels in some parts of the US (usually people running across the border into Mexico to by $.15 /gal. fuel.), broken crankshafts, etc.To VWs credit these problems were addressed rather quickly, and turbo versions were introduced that mitigated performance complaints, albeit at the risk of even more reliability problems. This actually triggered VWs sad 15+ year slide into oblivion here in the USA, which didn't turn around until the introduction of the New Beetle in the late '90's. Many a former VW devote ran to Honda, Toyota, etc. and has never returned.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
As far as i'm concerned, i consider that both petrol & diesel each have their different types of pollutants or 'toxins' etc. & there's no clear cut objective determinant as to which is overall the more 'unhealthy' fuel to use !!
Therefore, i prefer to regard petrol & diesel as on the same level of preference, to say the least, with their different pros & cons considered.
But i'll still utimately prefer a (modern cDi charge-cooled, not a primitive !) diesel over even the latest Kompressor or turbo petrol engines etc. as from the area of specific fuel efficientcy, fuel economy, long driving range & good torque performance (which i prefer over 'high' power outputs as i find high torque more practically useful than high power in a stop-start driving envirnoment etc.) the latest M-B diesels especially do appear as superior alternatives to theirs or for that matter, almost any other petrol engines around !
Even IF the 'toxicity' of pollutant discharge from a diesel vehicle is more than a petrol model, due to the far superior fuel efficientcy in a diesel, less volume / weight of diesel would be used to generate the same level of output performance compared to a petrol model i.e. the petrol engine would have to burn up more weight / volume of petrol fuel to match the same performance output as the diesel model, thereby that can effectively 'negate' any advantages of perceived lower levels of 'toxicity' with petrol ! I find the Japanese diesel vehicles especially their cars & vans inferior in performance, noise vibration harshness levels compared to European diesel vans & cars. Nothing outstanding about Japanese diesel vehicle emission levels as well. So if the Japanese are 'anti-diesel', due to the lousiness of their own diesel vehicles, that's then no surprise to me !
The Europeans are very much into further improvements in diesel technology compared to others so it's nothing surprising if they end up making the best diesels around that can remove much of the 'anti-diesel' sentiment around which tends to be based on inferior & outdated diesel technology, as that's about all the rest of the world knows when it comes to diesels !
I find USA diesels 'so-so' in appeal so that can explain their 'lacklustre' interest in diesel cars & vans especially. I figure they need to try out the modern European diesel models much more to fire up greater interest in preference for diesel models !
Oliver Keating wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

7
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
In the UK diesel fuel costs the same as petrol, yet diesel-car sales are rising. It's not just the lower fuel costs that drive this, though I don't doubt it's a factor, perhaps especially with fleet operators.
DAS --
--
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.