Aaaah, sorry to nitpick, but MB states 135 km/h
for the manual trans W123 200D with 60 PS -
the older 55 PS version with manual trans was
stated with 130 km/h (and with auto trans 125 km/h).
143 km/h were stated for W123
- 240D manual trans with 72 PS
- 240 TD manual trans with 72 PS from 08/1978 on
- 300D with auto trans with 80 PS
- 300TD with auto trans with 80 PS
- 300CD with 78 PS (auto trans available only)
In reality most W123 diesels were a bit faster
than stated by the factory - coupes were a bit
faster than the saloons due to the lower roofline
and T-models were a bit faster than the saloons
due to their rear delivering slightly better
And YES, by today's standards _all_ W123 diesels
I carefully used the word "indicated", especially as my figure is greater
than the works figure, which you just confirmed.. :-)
My work colleagues -- many of whom had the same car type -- were always
envious as they never bust the 140 km/h barrier. I put it all down to
careful running in...
Of course, we have to deduct something for the inaccuracy of the speedo :-(
...which is why I never tried to find out the true top speed in order not
shatter any illusions...
I must say, before I acquired the 200D -- my first diesel -- I could not
understand why certain Mercs made only 'stately progress' on motorways and
slowed down further on gentle inclines. I just thought they were very
dignified and unhurried... :-)))
BTW, I think we have had this conversation before...
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
Well, I use it for city driving only - there
power is not that important but to know the
fastest route to your destination.
On country roads you notice _how_ slow it is
because at - say - 90 km/h you put the hammer
down and - nothing happens: It takes ages to
reach the 110 km/h or so you would need to
Largely the very same situation on 2-lane
highways where you rarely have a chance
to change from the right to the left lane -
with 3-lane highways the situation is somehow
better but you always notice it is car from
BTW it always astounded me how much better
a W124 200D with the very same 72 PS performs
on country roads and highways.
I was under the impression that older MB were very reliable. My family
currently owns two of them; both have more than 160,000 miles and have
had only minor non-engine related problems (window switches, plugged
A/C drain hoses, wiper motor, etc).
how many owners have these cars had? You've done all the maintenance at
the proper times, correct?
Maybe it's just where I live, but most Benz's around here that I've seen
with that mileage that have had multiple owners are utter pieces of crap.
The ones with that mileage that are nice, people do not sell.... unless they
are gasoline cars. Which brings me to my original point.. if they are
selling, there is something wrong.
My parents have, yes, and had I been the owner I would have been able
to afford to perform the preventative maintenance myself. One of the
cars-- a 1988 300SE (which has a value of ~$3,800 in my area today)--
has had a total of about $4,000 worth of maintenance on it. My parents
are the second owner of it.
Personally, I don't like the car very much or I would just buy one of
those; instead I thought I would look for a recommendation for
If you already have that car, why not drive it?
I doubt the cylinder head is going to go North on you without any warning at
all, especially considering that your parents are the second owners..
Seems reasonable to drive it for a year or so until you find something you
really like and then get that... or heck, just keep driving the 300SE for a
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
three's, i heard these same kind of opinions a few months ago when i was
asking for people's thoughts, but so far i really haven't found much
validity to them. In my experience, nothing much has really gone wrong,
and the decision to buy a mercedes over a honda or a toyota has been, so
far at least, a good one. i say, if it's the car you want to own and
drive, then go for it. if you're asking for opinions here, you've
prolly done some serious research on what you want to spend your dollars
on, and it's better to make the decision yourself rather than hoping
other people will reinforce it. do what you want to do.
and as for students and mercedes not going well together, there was a
recent poll in the benzworld.org's W123 forum which seems to show that
there are owners of all age groups for older mercedes.
Celica Dude wrote:
<pre wrap="">Can you work on a car? If not I don't recommend one at all.
<pre wrap="">Well, I'm no mechanic, but I can hold my own when it comes to
technical knowledge about cars, spotting potential problems, and
performing simple replacements (taking off air filter to replace spark
plugs and wires, changing shocks, etc).
Marlinspike's advice may be brutally honest, but it's worth considering.
Reliability, Student, and Mercedes-Benz are not three things that commonly
appear in the same sentence.
If you cannot afford to spend at least $80 - $110 per hour (Benz dealer
around here charges 110 last I checked) for labor, or cannot troubleshoot
and repair the car yourself (and afford the shop manuals and all the tools
needed), then you don't need to drive behind the three-pointed star.
Get a Toyota if you want a reliable car that's easily fixed.
If you have the financial resources for the maintenance, a 300D is a good
choice assuming diesel is easy to buy where you are. However be prepared for
the expense of parts and labor (if you can't do it yourself) on any MB model
more than 10 years old or with more than 100,000 miles.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.