I own a 99 BMW M3 convertible and a, looking to upgrade it to a new car..am
stuck between a new M3Conv or an SLK350..I know the shortcomings of an
M3...however to buy a newly created model worries me..My M3has never had a
thing wrong with it in the 5 years i owned it...any comments??
Well , the M3 is on big advantage , M3 is expensive, but it"s worth it, the
SLK 350 is new , but the sport felling is very low compare to M3, the SLK
350 is a great roadster , perfomance are very like ( M3 ( 5,4 ) , SLK 350
( 5,6 ) ), but the RPM are on a BMW side :-), but i assume that normal car
enthusiast woudn"t take any second to think , and to see which is better .
Live with ideas...........
Novo u Splitu!
Actually.... if you compare the paper figures of an M3 cab. and a Z4 they
are suprisingly similar, only .4s on 0-60 and nothing in 50-75 in 4th...
what it doesn't say is that 50-75 when you work through the gears is a damn
sight quicker in an M3! Also, BMW performance figures seem very
conservative. I know and have seen a standard M3 hit 60 in 4.8 and my cab
isn't that much slower, unless I have the kids in the back!
For me there is no competition, I've never owned an MB but have driven C and
E classes and SLs. I'd stick with an M3 any day.
That is another story , then they are similar , in Europe , the M3 E36
cabrio , in the first edition had "only" 286 bhp , and in the second edition
had 321 bhp . Z4 3.0 is 231 hp , and 5.8 sec do 100 km/h .
First man then machine...........Honda S2000
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.