New SL owners?

I am looking at new SL600 or SL55 and wanted to know if there are any owners here that can give me some feedback, thanks for any comments.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Looks like a great way for someone to get a line on where to "aquire" a new SL, or am I being suspicious?
Larry B.
ps. I couldn't afford a SL55 or SL600 in my dreams...

owners
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
I just got rid of my '03 SL500. After 10 months, the thrill was gone. It wasn't a major consideration, but the time spent in the shop was a contributing factor. I moved up from a couple of SLK's, and the size and weight just made me feel like I was in slow-motion; maybe an SL55 or SL600 would solve that, but I tend to think not. It's just a big car (for a roadster).

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Thanks for the feedback... I have a quirky Italian car at the moment (with a horse on the badge) and was looking at getting rid of that for something that was a bit more of a daily driver and didnt spend 1/2 the time in the shop.
I think some further looking might be in order.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

The 3 valve, V8 500 motor is underpowered by todays crazy standards. The older 4 valve per cylinder had 15 more HP I think.
MB needs to release a SL350 (3.7 liter motor) for the slow pokes and up the power of the 500...it needs about 50 more HP.
The 03 SL was the first year production, right...that could be part of the reason for all the problems, look at the first two years of the ML, the first year (2000) new S class was plagued, etc.
Wait for 04...
Oh, a few people at:
www.mbworld.com
own new SLs
Also try
www.bnzworld.com
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

C&D just did a roundup of ~$75,000 roadsters as an excuse to test the new Cadillac XLR.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id &article_idp61
The five cars they tested were the XLR, the Jag XK8, the Lexus SC430, the Porsche 911 Carrera 4 Cabrio and the SL500.
The SL won in a landslide. The gap between the SL (200 points) and the second-place Porsche (183 points) was nearly twice as big as the gap between second place and last place (the Jag, with 174 points).
The online version of the article doesn't appear to include the charts from the magazine article that showed the differences in scoring.
The Caddy did okay--it finished third ahead of the Jag and the Lexus.
Of course, this roundup didn't take into account long-term reliability, but it's clear that they thought the SL made a great touring car, and they thought the performance was very good, relative to its competition.
--Paul ** Note "removemunged" in email address and remove to reply. **
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Yes... you are. Was I asking for peoples home addresses?

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Do not get a SL600 unless you have plenty of money and another car to drive while your 600 is in the shop. The history of the 600 series is pretty bad as far as reliability is concerned. And if you think regular MB parts are expensive...well, you ain't seen nothing yet. The 600 is a limited edition car...not made for everyday driving.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.