- posted
20 years ago
:) bit of fun
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
I did Enzo vs Fiesta Zetec for the humour :)
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
Let's consider the contenders.... One an extremely powerful car made out of plastic and weighing next to nothing. The other an extremely powerful car made out of lard and weighing seven fuckloads of a heavy thing.
Doesn't really take much working out does it ? :)
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
Yeah but ones got Twin turbo's and 450bhp, you dont need to know the rest :)
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
And the 4.2 TVR will have 350 horses or so. And be lighter. And have no 4x4 transmission losses.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
Or a dog in the back. ;-)
Mark S.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
In article , snipped-for-privacy@ron114.com spouted forth into uk.rec.cars.modifications...
impreza sti V Lambo Gallardo Gallardo won, but only made up in the second 1/8th mile.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
And no turbo lag, or drive-by-wire throttle.
RS4 is a quick car, no one is denying that, but it isn't a sports car and in the right hands TVR will be quicker.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
true :)
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
and does the maclaren vs the bike.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
: > Let's consider the contenders.... One an extremely powerful car made : > out of plastic and weighing next to nothing. The other an extremely : > powerful car made out of lard and weighing seven fuckloads of a heavy : > thing. : > Doesn't really take much working out does it ? :)
: Yeah but ones got Twin turbo's and 450bhp, you dont need to know the rest :)
RS4 is 2.7 V6 380bhp (RS6 is 4.2 V8 450bhp).
Blair.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
...to break down.
Richard
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
What about Murcielago vs. Gallardo? IMO, whilst the Murcielago is the true 'Lambo', the Gallardo is the faster car point to point, and the one most likely to be enjoyable on a regular basis. I surely wasn't alone in noticing the closeness of the times between the two on Top Gear, but the Gallardo's time was recorded in the wet - a fact conveniently forgotten as obviously as it is remembered when something they like is a million seconds slower than a GT3.
Of course, I'd have the Murcielago. If I wanted practical, I'd have a Volvo.
Richard
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
i prefer the lambswagen imo.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
B.G. Finlay IT Services ( snipped-for-privacy@dux.dundee.ac.uk) wrote: : RS4 is 2.7 V6 380bhp (RS6 is 4.2 V8 450bhp).
Just to correct myself, the above is the old RS4. The current one is 4.2 V8 344bhp.
Blair.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
no you were right the first time.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
I thought the 4.2 V8 was the S4?
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
it is. but the RS4 is twin turbo's also.
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
Just to correct you, that's wrong - it's the S4 that has 344bhp :)
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
If you look closely you will see the 4wd RS4 leaves the line in front. Then the light RWD TVR activates weight transfer, hooks up and goes away.
Once moving on road or track a well balanced RWD with about 25bhp and
100kgs less can match a 4wd. The lower the weight the less power is needed. The 4wd may go though the corner faster but the RWD's ability to accelerate out the corner quicker negates this. FWD is just for losers.-- Peter Hill Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header Can of worms - what every fisherman wants. Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!