So, rather than unlike the Renault, it's the same as the Renault then - where you don't have to put the keycard anywhere? Mine stays in my pocket. It's actually unlike in an Aston where you have to insert the 'keycard' - which is actually more of a cube - into the dash. Still, why let facts get in the way of an ill-informed rant eh?
Hold on; I'm not saying that power is irrelevant. But for charging up and down the motorways in a company vehicle doing company meetings and suchlike, it's academic.
I know what a 2-speaker poverty VAG audio install sounds like.
Because diesel is the only option, even if you opt out.
See above, and the small matter of losing my safety net.
But that's why I posted, I am open to suggestions.
I've driven the 105 and 140 Passats back to back. The 140 is significantly more relaxing to drive cross-country. Not all my miles are on motorway / dual carriageway, so I need some poke for overtaking trucks and caravans in the Welsh mountains, too.
140bhp is fine, but you can't have a 318d with an auto box.
I'm testing the A4 and the 320d in a week or two anyway.
My 225 had keyless, and you didn't have to insert the card anywhere for it to start. Keyless entry too, you just pulled the handle and the door unlocked and opened.
*That* is more to the point. Dissing a system only because it has front speakers only makes you the Halfrauds target audience :).
If it's just that and you're not getting into trouble for it, take out the h/u and speakers, replace with decent ones and return it to factory spec at the end of the lease.
If you (carefully) buy used, you can get a very high quality system for
The ECU will know *what*? I know why I'm suspicious of anything too modern with just too much electronics in it.
Bit annoying to do the swap for every service, but you could possibly get away with just the H/U. But if they see that when they check the ECU for codes etc, it's a pants idea.
Fair enough. I find this a bit odd as it won't do anything for the resale value so your employer is likely to get shafted on the leasing rate, but hey, a bean counter probably justified his or her existence.
I think it's a clever move for the beancounters, as the A3 in question is the 'E' version with sub 120 whatevers emissions, which puts it in a super-low tax band and will make it very attractive as a used car in a few years time.
Yeah and I'm coming across as badly in need of a gin and tonic, beer, or both combined.
Right-o. The 1.9 I tried didn't feel sluggish, felt fine for overtaking and suchlike; the 2.0 feels positively eager. I'd take a higher spec 1.9 over a lower spec 2.0 and accept that I'd get there in more comfort if a little later. :)
Are you going to be able to do a back to back? I would try to test drive two, three or four - taking the first car to the second dealer, and vice-versa...
I would because I can't stand them. Honestly, I really can't. BMW went downhill a fair bit in the last half decade and the 3 series is as common as dogshit too. They're even more common than the Mondeo I drive. They've lost the exclusivity they had. So there you go, by getting the 320D, you've well and truly entered sales rep fleet hack territory.
Personally I can't see owt wrong with just giving you the money and letting you buy what you want within reason.
Yes, they getting common. Usually 318d ES spec rather than 320d SE spec.
The real selling point of them is that I can have RWD, 177bhp and a decent auto box on one.
If I go with the A4 I get a CVT box and only 143bhp - and Audi don't have any CVT demonstrators.
The Passat is a decent option - leather, DSG and 143bhp, but it's only semi-auto climate and is so cheap that I'd be better off buying a 1 year old example myself.
Because we get better deals by buying in bulk - the 320d SE would cost me around £650 / month to lease, fully maintained.
I get £475 / month as a cash alternative, which gets you f*ck all on the new market, f*ck all from the lease market and leaves you running the risk of used cars.
Well I am biased because that's what I've essentially just done...
Do bear in mind that the 9-3 Sports Saloon was designed to better the Volvo S60; in my opinion, both have some similarities (cabin, comfort, performance), disadvantages (expensive parts) and differ a little in the drive. The Volvo's five cylinder engines are superb but the petrol models are a little thirsty; the diesel is just great. The Saab's 2.0 turbo works very well regardless of 1.8t / 2.0t / 2.0T badge, the 1.8i is gutless and - well you know my concerns over the TiD's reliability in the '03 to '05 age.
The Volvo has a better ride, the 9-3 has better handling. Both are not the most spacious of the breed, if you want a big interior, buy a Mondeo...
Dismissing the 9-3 as a long wheelbase Astra / shortwheel base Vectra is missing the point, too...
Petrol and LPG would be my choice... oh wait... aren't I doing just that? :)
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.